Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 14.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 6, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 517 Words, 3,052 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/20396/7.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims ( 14.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00921-CCM

Document 7

Filed 12/06/2005

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS AMERICAN FLOOR CONSULTANTS AND INSTALLATIONS, INC. and CLAYTON W. KING, Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 05-921C (Judge C. Miller)

DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Defendant respectfully requests the Court to grant an enlargement of time of 46 days, to and including January 30, 2006, within which to file its reply in support of its motion to dismiss. The response is currently due on December 15, 2005. Counsel for plaintiff has informed counsel for the defendant that he does not oppose this request for an enlargement of time. No previous enlargements of time for this purpose have been requested or granted. Counsel for the defendant requests the additional time because she has other commitments that require a substantial amount of her time. First, she had an oral argument on cross-motions for judgment on November 29, 2005, in Precision Standard, Inc. v. United States, No. 05-1125C (Fed. Cl.), a bid protest proceeding. She also has an oral argument on December 9, 2005, before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Discenza v. Navy, No. 05-3078 (Fed. Cir.). She is required to file a post-trial brief on December 16, 2005, in Spodek v. United States, No. 03-1444C (Fed. Cl.). A reply brief in the same case is due on January 11, 2006, and a closing argument will be held on January 17, 2006. She is also required to file responses to complaints in Silver State Construction Co. v. United States, No. 05-978C (Fed. Cl.) and Arbitraje Casa de Cambio v. United States, No. 05-921C (Fed. Cl.), on December

Case 1:05-cv-00921-CCM

Document 7

Filed 12/06/2005

Page 2 of 3

23 and December 26, 2005, respectively. She is required to file a brief in Kokenge v. DVA, No. 05-7184 (Fed. Cir.), on December 28, 2005, and, finally, she is required to file a brief in Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. United States, No. 05-751C (Fed. Cl.) on January 23, 2006. For the foregoing reasons, we respectfully request the Court to grant defendant's motion for an enlargement of time. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director

s/ James M. Kinsella JAMES M. KINSELLA Deputy Director

s/ Doris S. Finnerman DORIS S. FINNERMAN Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Department of Justice Tel: (202) 307-0300 Fax: (202) 305-7643 Attorneys for Defendant December 6, 2005

2

Case 1:05-cv-00921-CCM

Document 7

Filed 12/06/2005

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on December 6, 2005, a copy of "DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

s/ Doris S. Finnerman

3