Free Response - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 28.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 22, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 314 Words, 2,052 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/20434/13.pdf

Download Response - District Court of Federal Claims ( 28.0 kB)


Preview Response - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00954-LAS

Document 13

Filed 12/22/2005

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ____________________________________) D. GORDON POTTER,

Case No. 1:05-cv-00954-LAS

Judge: Loren A. Smith

PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM COMES NOW Plaintiff D. Gordon Potter ("Plaintiff") pursuant to Court of Federal Claims Rule 15 and for his Reply to Defendant's First Amended Answer and Counterclaim states as follows: DEFENSES 50. 51. 52. Denies that this Court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiff's Due Process claim. Denies that this court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiff's Takings Clause claim. Denies that the Court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiff's refund claim for tax year

1998 because plaintiff has not paid all assessed penalties and interest in full as required. In addition to the payments set forth in Plaintiff's complaint, Plaintiff reported that federal income tax was withheld and paid in the amount of $72,043 on Plaintiff's originally filed 1040. All taxes purportedly owed have been paid in full.

Case 1:05-cv-00954-LAS

Document 13

Filed 12/22/2005

Page 2 of 2

COUNTERCLAIM 53. Denies for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the

truth of the allegation. 54. 55. 56. Denies. Denies. Denies for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the

truth of the allegation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that this Court dismiss defendant's Counterclaim; prays for judgment against the United States on the facts and the law and finds that the negligence penalty imposed by Defendant is erroneous; and for such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper under the circumstances. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

Date: 12/23/05

By:

s/ Robert J. Stientjes Robert J. Stientjes Gasaway & Stientjes 41 S. Old Orchard Ave., Ste. B Saint Louis, Missouri 63119 (314) 961-3812 telephone (314) 918-7120 facsimile Counsel for Plaintiff

2