Free Amended Document - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 112.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: June 30, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 586 Words, 3,299 Characters
Page Size: 614 x 790 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/20435/38-2.pdf

Download Amended Document - District Court of Federal Claims ( 112.3 kB)


Preview Amended Document - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00955-LAS

Document 38-2

Filed 06/30/2006

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

D. GORDON POTTER, UNICO SERVICES, INC.

Plaintiffs,

v.

Case No.1: 05-cv-00954-LAS & Case No.1: 05-cv-00955-LAS

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Defendant.

AFFIDAVIT OF ROBERT J. STIENTJES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS I, Robert J. Stientjes, being first duly sworn upon oath, depose and state as follows: 1. 2. I am the attorney of record for the above-named plaintiffs. On behalf of my clients, I have tried to obtain the denial for the Claims for

Refund or Credit filed by D. Gordon Potter and Unico Services, Inc. since June of 2005. I have sent numerous letters and faxes to various IRS personnel involved in the Plaintiffs' tax matters requesting denial of the filed claims. 3. Finally, on or about August 18, 2005, I received a fax from Mr. Robert J. Gee,

IRS ATAT Exam Group Manager, and which referenced my requests that the IRS issue an immediate refund claim disallowance for D. Gordon Potter and Unico Services, Inc. A copy of the fax coversheet and letter from Mr. Gee dated August 18, 2005 is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. The first sentence of the letter from Mr. Gee states that we "will deny the claim for refund." Mr. Gee also stated that he had additional questions that required the Plaintiffs' explanation.

a

EXHIBIT

fl

Case 1:05-cv-00955-LAS

Document 38-2

Filed 06/30/2006

Page 2 of 3

4.

At approximately 5:20 p.m. eastern time on or about August 18, 2005, upon

0

receipt of the fax from Mr. Gee, I had a conversation with Mr. Gee and answered the questions raised by in his August 18, 2005 letter. The goal for that conversation was with the sole purpose to facilitate the denial of the Plaintiffs' Claims for Refund. At the conclusion of the telephone conversation, Mr. Robert J. Gee verbally communicated to me his decision to deny both D. Gordon Potter and Unico Services, Inc.'s Claims for Refund. In addition, Mr. Robert J. Gee asked me to submit Form 3363 and Form 2297 to Ms. Marie Allen, which I did on August 25, 2005. Mr. Robert J. Gee then informed me that upon receipt of the executed forms, the IRS will mail the official notices of disallowance to us shortly. 5. Upon completion of my conversation with Mr. Robert J. Gee, I made a time entry

where I recorded the date and the time I spent talking to Mr. Robert J. Gee. An excerpt of the billing record of Gasaway & Stientjes LLC f/k/a Gasaway & Stientjes LLP is attached to hereto

0

as Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein. 6. On or about August 30, 2005, relying on Mr. Robert J. Gee's statement that my

clients' Claims for Refunds were denied, I filed complaints for refund on behalf of my clients, D. Gordon Potter and Unico Services, Inc. with this Court.

[the rest of the page is left blank intentionally]

0

2

Case 1:05-cv-00955-LAS

Document 38-2

Filed 06/30/2006

Page 3 of 3

FURTHER YOUR AFFIANT SAITH NOT.

n
ntjes, Attorne (r Plaintiffs i the above-captioned case STATE OF MISSOURI COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS

Subscribed and sworn to before me, this 30T ay of May, 20

My commission expires: March 2, 2010.
EVITA TOLU Notary Public - State of Missouri County of St. Louis My Commission Expires Mar. 2, 2010 Commission #068447540

0

3