Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :05-cv-00023-JJF Document 26 Filed 06/28/2005 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
)
DOW CHEMICAL CANADA INC., on its own )
behaif and as assignee of THE DOW CHEMICAL )
COMPANY, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
HRD CORPORATION (d/b/a Marcus Oil & )
Chemical) ) Case No. 05»O23 (HF)
)
Defendant, Counterclaim Plaintift] )
)
v. )
)
DOW CHEMICAL CANADA INC., on its own )
behalf and as assignee of THE DOW CHEMICAL )
COMPANY, and THE DOW CHEMICAL )
COMPANY, )
)
Counterclaim Defendants )
)
)
STIPULATION AND ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the undersigned parties
and subject to the approval of the Court that the time for Dow Chemical Canada, Inc. and The
Dow Chemical Company to respond to HRD C0i·poration’s amended ccunterclaiins is extended
to and including July 5, 2005.

Case 1 :05-cv-00023-JJF Document 26 Filed 06/28/2005 Page 2 of 2
MORRZES NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNEL}., POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
Kenneth J. Nachbar (#2067) Richard L. Horwitz (#2246)
Thomas W. Briggs, Jr. (#4076) Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
1.201 North Market Street Hercules Plaza, 6m Floor
P.O. Box 1347 1313 North Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 Wilmington, DE 19899-0951
(302) 575-7294 (302) 984-6027
[email protected] rhorwitz@potterandersoncom
[email protected] Attorneys for HRD Corporation
Atrornegvsfor Dow Chemical Canada, Inc.
and The Dow Chemical Company
SO ORDERED this day of , 2005.
fudge
2