Free Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 1,591.0 kB
Pages: 21
Date: February 8, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 9,371 Words, 61,366 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/20656/7-4.pdf

Download Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) - District Court of Federal Claims ( 1,591.0 kB)


Preview Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) - District Court of Federal Claims
CIVl/ECF California Central District - DocketReport Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM

https://ecf, cacd,uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?117637169551038-... Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 1 of 21

I plaintiff clms [103-1] (pj) Modifiedoll 09/15/2003(Entered: 05/23/2003) 05/27/2003 10~7 ORDER Judge Diclcran Tevrizian, ganting ex parte application for an by extension of time to respondto plaintiff clms [103-1] (bp) (Entered: 05/30/2003) PLACED FILE - NOT IN USED; proposed order denying defendant's ex parte application for an extension of time to respondto plaintiffs complaint. (bp) (Entered: 05/30/2003) and by 108 STIPULATION ORDER Judge Diclcran Tevrizian that the followingbriefing schedulingis ordered: Defendants shall file and serve response(s) to the third amended complaintno later than 06/I 6/03; Defendantsresponse to the third amended complaint is anything other Ihan an Answer (e.g. a Motionto Dismiss), the following briefing scheduleshall apply: Plaintiff shall file and serve it sOppostions any to Motionsdirected to the third amended complaintno later than 07/03/03. Defendants shall file and serve Replies in support of any motionsdirected to the third amended complaintno later than 07/18/03; Hearingdate for any motionsdirected to the third amended complaint shall be 08/11/03 (see document further details). (jp) (Entered: 06/09/2003) for 109 APPLICATION by plaintiffHirel ConnectorsInc for a protective filed order directing plaintiffs first anlendedcomplaintbe filed UnderSeal by I the Clerk of Cottrt ; Lodged ProposedOrder (jp) (Entered: 06/11/_00a) DECLARATIONJOEL R. BENNETT plaintiff of by Hirel Connectors Inc in supportof application for a protective order directing plaintiffs first amended complaint be filed UnderSeal by the Clerk of Court [109-1] (jp) (Entered: 06/11/2003) 111 REQUEST filed by defendant Amphenol Corporation for joining NorthropGrttmman Corporation's opposition to plaintiffs application for a protective order directing plaintiffs first anaended complaintbe flied UnderSeal [ 101-1 ] (jp) (Entered: 06/12/2003) 1 I2 OPPOSITION defendant Northrup Grunnnanto application for a by ~rotective order directing plaintiffs first amended complaintbe filed rnder Seal by the Clerk of Court [109-1] (jp) (Entered: 06/12/2003) 113 ORDER Judge Dickran Tevrizian DENYING by request that plaintiffs first anaendedcomplaintbe filed UnderSeal [109-1] (jp) (Entered: 06/16/2003) 1 I4 NOTICE MOTION MOTION defendant Sabritec to dismiss OF AND by third amended complaintof Hirel Co~mectors ; motionhearing set for Inc 10:00 8/11/03; LodgedOrder (jp) (Entered: 06/17/2003) 115 MEMORANDUM POINTS AND AUTHORITIES by defendant OF Sabritec tnc in support of motion to dismiss tbird amended complaint of Hirel ConnectorsInc [I 14-I] (jp) (Entered: 06/17/2003)

05/27/2003

[;~i;-~003

06/10/2003

i 06/10/2003

06/11/2003

06/11/2003

i 06/13/2003

06/16/2003

06/16/2003

23 of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

CM/ECF - California CentralDistrict - Docket Report https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pI?1176371695510 Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 2 of 21 06/16/2003 116 PROOF SERVICE defendant Sabritec on 6/16/03 of Notice of OF by motion and motion to dismiss third amended complaint of Hirel Cotmectors (see document ful~her details). (jp) (Entered: Inc for 06/17/2003) 117 NOTICEOF MOTION ANDMOTION defendant Northrop Grumman by to dismiss plaintiffs third amended complaint; motionhearing set for 10:00 8/11/03; Lodged Proposedorder (jp) (Entered: 06/17/2003) 118 NOTICEOF MOTION ANDMOTION defendant Amphenol by Corporation to dismiss Hirel ConnectorsInc third amended complaint ; motionhearing set for 10:00 8/11/03 (jp) (Entered: 06/18/2003) OF AND by 119 NOTICE MOTION MOTION defendant ITT Industries Inc to dismiss plaintiffs third an~ended complaint; motionhearing set for 10:00 8/11/03 (jp) (Entered: 06/26/2003) by 119 JOINDER defendant ITT Industries Inc joining motionsto dislniss plaintiffs third amended complaint [117-1], [118-1] filed by Northrop Grumman Corporation, Amphenol Corporation, and Sabritec Inc (jp) (Entered: 06/26/2003) and by 120 STIPULATION ORDER Judge Dickran Tevrizian that plaintiff shall file and serve its Oppositionto the pendingmotionsdirected to the third anaendedcomplaintno later than 07/07/03. Service shall be by personal delivery to the offices of the moving Defendants.All other parties maybe served by mail. Plaintiff mayfile on over-sized Opposition Brief no morethan 36 pages in lenght, in lieu of 4 separate opposition brief each 25 pages in lenght; Thedefendantsshall file and serve their Replies in support of any of their motionsto dismiss the third amended complaint no later than 07/25/03. The hearing date for defendants motions to dismiss the third amended complaint shall remain08/11/03. (jp) (Entered: 07/03/2003) 121 OPPOSITION BRIEFby plaintiff Hirel Connectors Inc to defendants motionsto dismiss [114-1], [117-I], [118-1], [119-1] (jp) (Entered: 07/08/2003) 122 DECLARATION JOEL R. BENNETT plaintiffHirel of by Connectors Inc in support of opposition to motionsto dismiss [114-1], [117-1], [118-1], [119-1] (jp) (Entered: 07/08/2003) 123 REPLY Memorandum Points and Authorities by defendant Sabritec in of support of motionto dismiss third amended complaint of Hirel i ConnectorsInc [114-1] (bp) (Entered: 07/29/2003) 124 REPLY Memorandum defendant Nortlv-up Grunnnan in support of to by motionto dismiss plaintiffs third anaendedcomplaint[117-1] (bp) (Entered: 07/29/2003) 125 REPLY Memorandum defendant ITT Industries hlc in support of by motionto dismiss plaintiffs third anaendedcomplaint[119-I] (bp)

06/16/2003

06/17/2003

06/25/2003

06/25/2003

07/02/2003

07/07/2003

07/07/2003

07/25/2003

07/25/2003

07/25/2003

24of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-birdDktRpt.pl? 117637169551038-... CM/ECF - California CentralDistrict - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 3 of 21 (Entered: 07/29/2003) I 07/25/2003 Brief by defendant Amphenol Corporation to opposition to 126 REPLY motionto dismiss Hirel Connectorslnc third anaendedcomplaint [118-1] (bp) (Entered: 07/29/2003) 127 NOTICE JOINDER OF AND JOINDER defendant Sabritec joining by defendants Northrop Grumnaan Corporation's, Amphenol Corporation's i motionto dismiss plaintifPs third amended complaint[117-1] (jp) i (Entered: 07/30/2003) OF PARTIES filed by defendant Sabritec Inc 128 NOTICE INTERESTED (jp) (Entered: 07/30/2003) 129 SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals by relating to third claim for relief [Conversion] plaintiff Hirel Connectors by Inc (jp) (Entered: 07/31/2003) 130 ORDER Judge Dickran Tevrizian GRANTING by Defendant Nortl~rop Gmman's Corporation's motion to dismiss plaintiffs third amended complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH THIRTY DAYSLEAVE TO AMEND (dismissal of Plaintiffs Tenth Cause of action is granted with prejudice and WITHOUT LEAVE AMEND) 17-1], GRANT part TO [I in DENY part DefendantSabritec Inc's motion to dismiss third amended in complaintof Hirel ConnectorsInc (dismissal of Plaintiffs Tenth cause of action is granted with prejudice and WITHOUT LEAVE AMEND); TO [114-1], GRANT part DENY part Defendant Amphenol in in Corporation's motion to dismiss Hirel ComaectorsInc third amended complaint(dismissal of Plaintiffs Tenth cause of action is granted with prejudice and WITHOUT LEAVETO AMEND)[118-1], GRANTING DefendantITTIndustries Inc's motionto dismiss plaintiff's third amended complaint GRANTED WITHOUTPREJUDICE AND WITH THIRTY DAYS AMEND; TO (dismissal of Plaintiffs Tenth cause of action is wanted with prejudice and WITHOUT LEAVE AMEND)[119-1] TO (pj) (Entered: 08/12/2003) PLACED FILE - NOT IN USED:[Proposed} Order wanting defendant Sabritec laac's motionto dismiss third amended complaint ofplaintiffHirel Co~mectors Inc; Lodged 06/16/03. (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) PLACED FILE - NOT IN USED:[Proposed] Order ~'anting Northrop Grumman Corporation's motion to dismiss plaintiff's third amended complaint; Lodged06/16/03 (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) before Judge Dickran Tevrizian: (1) Defendant Amphenol 151 MINUTES Corporation's motionto dismiss third amended complaint[ 118-I ]; Joinder by defendants lIT Industries & Sabritec Inc; (2) DefendantNorthrop's motion to dismiss third amended complaint [117-1]; (3) Defendant Sabritec's motionto dismiss third amended complaint [114-I]; and (4) DefendantITT hadustries hac's motion to dismiss third amended complaint [119-I]. Hearingheld on the abovereferenced matter. The Court order the

07/29/2003

07/29/2003 07/30/2003

08/11/2003

08/11/2003

08/11/2003

18/I 1/2003

25 of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

CM/ECF California Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Central District - DocketReport

https://ecf.cacd,uscourts,gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?117637169551038-... Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 4 of 21 ¯

' motion: GRANTED to mottons #: 9 and 4; GRANTED part and as in DENIED part as to motions: 1 and 3. CR: Lori Muraoka in (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003)

08/12/2003

131 NOTICE OF FILING ORIGINAL PROOFOF SERVICE OF SUIVIMONS executed upon defendants Dept of Defense USA,Donald H Rumsfeld,Jacques Gmlsler, Keith WLippert, Defense Logistics, Alan S Thompson,Defense Supply Ctr, Robert MHeber, AbdoAbdouni, ~ Sabritec, Deutsch Ltd, Amphenol Corporation, Northrup Grumman, Deutsch Co, Northrop Grumman, hadustries tJlc, TEC ITT Electrical, Veam SRL, Veam Elecktro (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) 132 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant AmphenolCorporation, aka Amphenol Aerospace Corporation, namedas Doe 3 herein; Service by Federal Statute on 7/24/03 via Personal service by serving Summons and Amended Complaintto Vivian hnperial - C.T. corporation - Authorized Agent. (jp)(Entered: 08/13/2003) 133 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant Deutsch Ltd, aka Dera, named Doe2 herein; Service by Statute not cited on 8/8/03 via as Personal service by serviug Summons First Amended and Complaintto Curtis McCollum, Agentfor service of process. (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) 134 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant Sabritec, named as Doe 1 herein; Service by UnderFRCP 4(h) on 7/24/03 via Personal service serving Summons First Amended and Complaintto Vivian Imperial, C.T. Corporation - Authorized Agent. (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) 135 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant Abdo Abdouni; Service by Under FRCP 4(i) on 7/29/03 via Certified mail by serving Summons and First Amended Complaint to Genoveua Ortega, Agent for service of ~rocess; Certified Mail Receipt attached. (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) 136 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant Robert MHeber; Service by Under FRCP 4(i) on 7/29/03 via Certified mail by serving Summons and First Amended Complaint to Genoveua Ortega, Agent for service of process; Original Certified MailReceipt attached¯ (ip) (Entered: ,08/13/2003) 137 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant Defense Supply Center t Columbus; Service by UnderFRCP 4(i) on 7/29/03 via Certified mail serving Summons First amendedcomplaint to GenoveuaOrtega, and I Agentfor service of process; Original Certified MailReceiptattached (jp) i (Entered: 08/13/2003)

08/12/2003

08/12/2003

08/12/2003

08/12/2003

08/12/2003

i 08/I2/2003

08/12/2003

1381 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant Alan S Thompson, [ Radm,USN,Commander the Defense Supply Center Columbus; of ! Service by UnderFRCP 4(i) on 7/29/03 via Certified mail by serving Summons First Amended and Complaint to GenoveuaOrtega, Agent for ~ service of process; Original Certified MailReceiptattached. (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003)

26 of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

CM/ECF - California CentralDistrict - Docket Report https://ecf, cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl? 117637169551038-... Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 5 of 21 08/12/2003 139 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant The Defense Logistics Agency;Service by UnderFRCP on 7/29/03 via Certified mail by 40) serving Summons First Amended and Complaint to GenoveuaOrtega, Agentfor service of process; Original Certified Mail Receipt attached. (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) 140 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendmat Keith WLippert, Vadm, USN,Director of the Defense Logistics Agency; Service by Under FRCP 4(i) on 7/29/03 via Certified mail by serving Sunmaons First and Amended Complaintto Genoveua Ortega, Agent for service of process; Original Certified Mail Receipt attached. (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) 141 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant Jacques Gansler, Under Secretary of Defensefor Acquisition, etc.; Service by UnderFRCP 4(i) 7/29/03 via Certified mail by serving Summons First Aanended and Complaintto Genoveua Ortega, Agentfor service of process; Original Certified Mail Receipt attached. (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) 142 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant Donald H Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense; Service by UnderFRCP 4(i) on 7/29/03 via Certified mail by serving Summons First Amended and Complaint to Genoveua Ortega, Agentfor service of process; Original Certified Mail Receipt attached. (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) 143 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant Department of Defense of the USA;Service by UnderFRCP 4(i) on 7/29/03 via Certified mail serving Summons First Amended and Complaint to GenoveuaOrtega, Agentfor service of process; Original Certified Mail Receiptattached. (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) 144 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant Northrup Grumman Veam, aka VeamUSA, and Northrop GrumanCorporation, Namesas Doe4 herein; Service by Under FRCP 4(h) on 7/24/03 via Personal service by serving Summons First Amended and Complaint to vivian hnperial, C.T. Corporation - AuthorizedAgent. (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) 145 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant VeamElecktro Anschlussteclmik GMBH; Service by Statute not cited on 5/23/03 via Personal service by serving Summons Third amendedcomplaint to and Susanne Thompson,General Manager(jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) 146 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant VeamSRL; Service by Statute not cited on 5/23/03 via Personal service by serving Summons and Third Amended Complaint to SusmmeThompson, General Manager 0P) (Entered: 08/13/2003) I47 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant TECElectrical Co,n, aponentsLtd;,,Service by Statute not cited on 5/23/03via Personal ser~ ice by servin= Summons Third Amended and Complaint to Susanne Thompson,General Manager(jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003)

08/12/2003

08/12/2003

08/12/2003

08/12/2003

08/12/2003

08/12/2003

08/12/2003

08/12/2003

27 of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-birdDktRpt.pl? 117637169551038-... CM/ECF - California CentralDistrict - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 6 of 21 08/12/2003 148 PROOF SERVICE OF executed upon defendant ITT Industries Inc; Service by Statute not cited on 5/23/03 via Personal service by serving Summons Third Amended and Complaint to Susanne Thompson, General Manager.(jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) 149 PROOF SERVICE OF executed ~tpon defendm~t Deutsch Ltd aka Dera, madThe Deutsch Co; Set-vice by Under CCP 415.20 on 1/21/03 via Substituted service by serving Summons First Amended and Complaint to Curtis McCollum, Authorized Agent by leaving copies with persence of Jim Jurado, Billing Manager;DueDiligence Declaration attached (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) OF BY 150 PROOF SERVICE MAILexecuted upon defendant Deutsch Ltd, aka Dera, and The Deutsch Co; Service by Under CCP415.20 on 1/22/03 via Mail by serving Summons First Amended and Complaint to address: 2444 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 600, Santa Monica,CA90403. (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2003) AND by 152 NOTICEOF DISCREPANCY ORDER Judge Dickran Tevrizian ordering Amendment Third Amended to Complaint submitted received on 08/15/03is not to be fld but instead rejected; Denial based on: Not submitted unproper fomaat. Should this be a 4th amended complaint. Plaintiffs counselis directed to the Court's Orderfiled 8/11/03and enter on 08/12/03. (jp) (Entered: 08/21/2003) 153 RECE1PT TRANSCRIPT proceedings for the following date(s): OF of 8/11/03 (Re:) CR: Lori Muraoka.(ghap) (Entered: 08/22/2003) TP._ANSCRIPT for proce~dingsheld on 8/11/03. (ghap) (Entered: filed 08/22/2003) 154 NOTICE COURT'S OF REJECTION Plaintiffs To Submission to File Amendmentto 3rd Alnended Complaint Naming VeamUSAas DOE5, submitted by plaintiff Hirel ConnectorsInc (yl) (Entered: 09/05/2003) 156 FORTHAMENDED COMPLAINT plaintiffHirel by Connectors Inc; jttry demand.Sttmmons issued (bp) Modified on 09/19/2003(Entered: not 109/t2/2003) 155 ! NOTICE DISCREPANCY ORDER Judge Dickran Tevrizian OF AND by ordering fourth amended complaint submitted by plaintiff Hirel Connectors hac., received on 9/10/03 to be fld and processed;fld date to be the date the doc ~vas stamped "received but not fld" ~v/the Clerk (bp) Modified on 09/19/2003 (Entered: 09/12/2003) SUMMONS issued (20 days) on Fourth Amended Complaint as defendants (jp) (Entered: 09/15/2003) SUMMONS issued (60 days) on Fourth Amended Complaint as defendants (jp) (Entered: 09/15/2003)

08/I 2/2003

08/12/2003

08/19/2003

08/21/2003 08/21/2003 09/04/2003

09/10/2003

09/10/2003

09/I2/2003 09/12/2003

28 of 67

02/0812006 AM 9:33

https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl? 117637169551038-... CM/ECF - California CentralDistrict - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 7 of 21 09/16/2003 157 EXPARTE APPLICATION filed by defendant Sabritec to extension of time for Sabritec Inc madAmphenol Corporation to answer or respond to plaintiffs complaint ; Lodged ProposedOrder (jp) (Entered: 09/17/2003) OF 158 MEMORANDUM POINT~ AND AUTHORITI£S by defendant Sabfitec in support ofex parte application to extension of time for Sabritec Inc and Amphenol Corporation to answeror respond to plaintiffs complaint [157-1] (jp) (Entered: 09/17/2003) 159 1 DECLARATION WILFREDO of HERNANDEZ, by defendant JR Sabntec m support ofex parte apphcatmnto extensmnof t~me for Sabritec Inc madAmphenol Corporation to answeror respond to plaintiffs complaint [157-1] (jp) (Entered: 09/17/2003) 160 PROOF SERVICE defendant Sabritec on 9/16/03 ofEx parte OF by ! application for an extension of time for Sabritec, Inc. and Amphenol for i Corporation to answerplaintiffs complaint (see document farther details). (jp) (Entered: 09/17/2003) 161 JOINDER defendant AmphenolCorporation joining defendant by Sabritec hac's ex parte application to extensionof time for Sabritec Inc and Amphenol Corporation to answer or respond to plaintiffs complaint [157-1]; LodgedProposed Order (jp) (Entered: 09/18/2003) ofIAN R. BARRETT defendant Amphenol by 162 DECLARATION Corporationin support ofjoinder in Sabritec Inc's ex parte application to extension of time for Sabritec Inc and Amphenol Corporation to answer or I respondto plaintiffs complaint[157-1] (jp) (Entered: 09/18/2003) PLACED FILE - NOTUSED;Fourth AmendedComplaint (bp) IN (Entered: 09/19/2003) 163 RESPONSEplaintiff Hirel Comaectors to ex parte application to by Inc extension of time for Sabritec Inc and Amphenol Corporation to answer or respond to plaintiffs complaint[157-1] (jp) (Entered: 09/19/2003) ORDER Judge Dickran Tevrizian that by 16~4 DefendnatSabritec's Iaac ex parte application to extension of time to answerplaintiff's fourth anaended complaint [157-1]. IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff shall file a Fifth that Amended Complaintwithin 24 hours of the entry of this Order deleting the Tenth Claim for Relief for Cmmnon misappropriation and Law clarifying the disgorgement relief sought in the Fifth Claimfor Relief for Violation of the California Unfair Competition limiting such relief to Act restitutionary disgorgementas authoritzed by Korea Supply vs. Lockheed Martin, 29 Cal.4th 1134(2003) and Defendants Sabritec and Amphenol shall answer said Fifth Amended Complaintwithin 30 days of service of saifFifth Amended Colnplaint upon siad defendants. (jp) (Entered: 09/22/2003)

09/16/2003

09/16/2003

109/16/2003

09/17/2003

09/17/2003

09/17/2003 09/18/2003

09/19/2003

09/19/2003

165 JOINDER Federal defendants Dept of Defense USA,Keith WLippert, by Alan S Thompson joining non-federal defendants ex parte application for

29 of 67

02/08/2006

9:33

AM

https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl? 117637169551038-,,, CM/ECF - California CentralDistrict - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 8 of 21 an extension of time to answeror respondto plaintiffs complaint[157-I] (jp) (Entered: 09/22/2003) 09/I 9/2003 166 OBJECTION defendant AmphenolCorporation to proposed order by submitted by Hirel Connectorsregarding Sabritec Inc's ex parte application to extension of time for Sabritec lnc and Amphenol Corporationto answeror respondto plaintiffs complaint[157-I] (jp) (Entered: 09/22/2003) ' PLACED FILE - NOT IN USED: [Proposed] Order granting extension of I time to maswer otherwise respond to complaint of Hirel Comlectors Inc; or I Lodged09/17/03 (jp) (Entered: 09/22/2003) PLACED FILE - NOT IN USED:[Proposed] Order granting ex parte application for an extension of time for defendantsSabritec hac and Amphenol Corporation to answer or respond to complaint of Hirel I Comaectors Inc; Lodged 09/16/03 (jp) (Entered: 09/22/2003) filed 167 OBJECTIONS by defendant Sabritec to order granting ex parte application submitt by plaintiffHirel Connectors [164-1] (jp) hlc I (Entered: 09/22/2003) 168 FI~THAMENDED COMPLA~T156-1 ] by plaintiff Hirel Cormectors [ Inc; jury demand.Summons issued (bp) (Entered: 09/25/2003) 169 STIPULATION ORDER Judge Dickaan Tevrizian that defendants and by shall file and serve their motionsin responseto plaintiffs Fifth kanended Complaint 10/07/03. Plaintiff shall file and serve its oppositions on on 10/21/03. Defendants shall file and serve their reply brief on 11/03/03. The hearing on defendants motionshall be 11/17/03. Service of defendants movingpapers and HiRel's opposing papers shall be by Federal Express, next day delivery. Service of reply papers maybe by mail. (jp) (Entered: 10/07/2003) ANDMOTION defendant Northrop Grumman by 170 NOTICEOF MOTION Corporation to dismiss plaintiffs fifth amended complaint ; motion hearing set for 10:00 11/17/03; Lodged Order (jp) (Entered: 10/08/2003) OF AND by 171 NOTICE MOTION MOTION defendant ITT hadustries Inc to dismiss plaintiffs fifth amended complaint; motionhearing set for I0:00 I1/17/03; LodgedOrder (jp) (Entered: 10/08/2003) 172 NOTICEOF MOTION MOTION defendant ITT h~dustfies Inc AND by to strike portions of plaintiffs fifth amended complaint; motionhearing set for I0:00 11/17/03(jp) (Entered: 10/08/2003) 173 NOTICEOF MOTION ANDMOTION defendant Northrop Grunnnan by to strike portions of plaintiffs fifth amended complaint; motionhearing set for 10:00 11/17/03; LodgedOrder (jp) (Entered: 10/08/2003) by for 174 REQUEST defendant Nortl~op Gmmman Judicial Notice in support of its motionto dismiss plaintiffs fifth amended complaint

09/19/2003

09/19/2003

09/19/2003

09/23/2003 I 0/06/2003

10/07/2003

10/07/2003

I 0/07/2003

10/07/2003

10/07/2003

30of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

https://ecf.c acd.uscour ts.gov/cgi-bi~Dkq.Rp t.pl? CM/ECF - California CentralDistrict - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 9 of 21117637169551038-... [ 170-1] (jp) (Entered: 10/08/2003) 10/09/2003 10/14/2003 I0/14/2003 I0/14/2003 177 RECEDT(s) from Post Office for documents mailed to London 10/9/03 for foreign service (mch) (Entered: 10115/2003) 175 ANSWER filed by defendant Deutsch Ltd to fifth amendedcomplaint [168-1] (inch) (Entered: 10/15/2003) 176 CERTIFICATE INTERESTED OF PARTIESfiled Ltd (inch) (Entered: 10/15/2003) by defendant Deutsch

178 NOTICE ERRATA defendant Northrup Grumman OF by correcting hearing date on motionto strike portions of plaintiffs fifth amended complaint[ 173-1] (bp) (Entered: 10/16/2003) 179 NOTICEOF MOTION ANDMOTION defendant Deutsch Ltd to by dismiss plaintiffs fifth amended complaint,or, in the alternat~ive, for moredefinite statement motionhearing set for 10:00 11/17/0a (bp) (Entered: 10/16/2003) 180 NOTICEOF MOTION MOTION defendants' Dept of Defense AND by USA,Donald H Rnmsfeld, Keith WLippert, and Alan S Thompson to I dismiss motionhearing set for 10:00 11/10/03(bp) (Entered: 10/20/2003) 181 BRIEF FILED plaintiff Hirel ComaectorsInc in opposition to by Nortl~rop'smotionsto dismiss plaintiffs fifth amended complaint[ 170-1], [171-1], [180-1], [179-1] (jp) (Entered: 10/21/2003) 182 OPPOSITION BRIEFby plaintiff Hirel Cmmectors!a~c to Northrop and ITT's motionsto strike portions of plaintiffs fifth amended complaint [172-1], [173-1] (jp) (Entered: 10/21/2003) 183 STI~ULATION ORDER Judge Dickran Tevrizian that the hearing and by on the Federal defendantspendingmotionto dismiss [ 180-1] plaintiffs state law claim, Bivensclaim and tort claims pursuant to Rule 12(b0(1) the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is CONTINUED to 11/17/03. Plmnt~ffs Oppos~tmn the Federal defendants motionto dismiss shall be to filed and served on 10/27/03; and TheFederal defendants Reply, if any, shall be filed and served on 11/03/03. (jp) (Entered: 10/23/2003) 184 ANSWER by defendant Sabritec to fifth amendedcomplaint [168-1] filed (bp) (Entered: 10/24/2003) 185 ANSWER fifth alnended complaint [ 168-1 ] and COUNTERCLAIM to by defendant Amphenol Corporation against plaintiff Hirel Connectorshac; summons issued (bp) (Entered: 10/24/2003) not I88 STI!PULATION ORDER Judge Dickran Tevrizian extending time and by to answer amended complaint [168-1] to 12/5/03 as to defendmats' Dept of Defense USA (bp) (Entered: 10/27/2003) 189 STIPULATION ORDER plaintiffs opposition to the federal and that defendants'pendingmotionto dismiss plaintiffs state la~v claim, Bivens

10/14/2003

I10/I 4/2003

10/20/2003

10/20/2003

10/22/2003

10/23/2003 10/23/2003

10/23/2003

10/23/2003

31of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

CM/ECF - California CentralDistrict - Docket Report https://ecf.cacd.uscom~.s.gov/cgi-birdDktRpt.pl?117637169551 Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 10 of 21 claim and tort claims pursuant to rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules Civil Procedureshall be filed and personally served on October29, 2003; and the Federal defendants'reply, if any, shall be filed and personally served on November 2003 by Judge Dickran Tevrizian (bp) (Entered: 5, 10/27/2003) 10/23/2003 190 NOTICE MOTION MOTION dey~e2adant ITT Veana LLC to OF AND by dismiss fifth amended co~nplaint motionhearin~ set for 10:00 I 1/17/03 (bp) (Entered: 10/28/200~) 186 CERTIFICATE INTERESTED OF PARTIESfiled Veanl LLC (jp) (Entered: 10/27/2003) by defendant ITT

10/24/2003 10/24/2003

ANDMOTION defendant ITT Veam LLC to by 187 NOTICEOF MOTION strike portion of plaintiffs fifth anaendedcomplaint and JOINDER in Northropmotionsto strike portions of plaintiffs fifth amended complaint; Memorandum points and authorities; motion hearing set for 10:00 of 11/17/03 (jp) (Entered: 10/27/2003) 208 RETURNOF SUMMONS AND PROOFOF SERVICE executed upon i defendant TEC Electrical Company Service by no statute cited on ; 10/21/03 via international registered mail by serving summons mad complaint, original receipt acknowledged "P Wodley" by (illegible), capacity cited (lc) (Entered: 11/21/2003) I91 OPPOSITION BRIEF plaintiffHirel Comaectorshac to Itt VeanaLlc's by motionto strike portion of plaintiffs fifth amended complaint[187-1] (pj) (Entered: 10/31/2003) 192 OPPOSITION plaintiff Hirel Connectors Inc to Itt Veam by Llc's motion to dismiss fifth an~ended complaint[ 190-1] (pj) (Entered: 10/31/2003) 193 OPPOSITION plaintiffHirel Comaectors Inc to Defendant The Deutsch by Comotionto dismiss plaintiffs fifth amended complaint[t 79-1 ], or in the alternative for moredefinite statement [179-2] (pj) (Entered: 10/31/2003) and by 194 STIPULATION ORDER Judge Dickran Tevrizian that between plaintiff and Federal defendants, through their respective counsel, with respect to HiRel's Fifth Amended Complaint,as follows: HiRet's Seventh claimfor elief for taking of private propertyin violation of the Fifth Amendment against federal defendants AbdoAbdouni and Robert M. Heberis dismissedwith prejudice; Third claim for relief for conversion, fourth claim for relief for violation of the CA uniformTradeSecrets Act, and Tenth claim for relief for negligent supervision are dismissedwith prejudice as against all Federal defendants, except defendant USA; Third claimfor relief for conversion,fourth claim for relief for violation of the California UniformTradeSecrets Act, and Tenth claim for relief for negligent supervision are dismissed withont prejudice as against defendant USA; First and second claims for declaratory and injunctive relief are dismissed with prejudice as against all Federal defendants, except defendant DonaldH. Rumsfeld,in his official capacity as Secretary of

10/24/2003

I0/30/2003

10/30/2003 10/30/2003

I0/31/2003

32of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bi~JDktRpt.pI? 117637169551038-... CM/ECF - California CentralDistrict - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 11 of 21 Defendse;Eight claim for breach of contract is dismissed with prejudice as against all Federal defendnats, except defendant USA;TheFederal Defendantsshall file and serve their answerto the Fifth amended complaint and action on or before 12/09/03; and The Federal Defendants pendingmotionto dismiss [180-1] presently set for hearing on 11/17/03 is taken OFFCALDENDAR. (Entered: 11/04/2003) (jp) 11/03/2003 195 REPLYMEMORANDUM by defendants Northrop Grumman, ITT Industries Inc in supportof their motions strike portions of plaintiff's to fifth amended complaint [172-1], [173-1] (jp) (Entered: 11/04/2003) MEMORANDUM by defendant ITT Industries Inc in support of 196 REPLY motionto strike portions ofplaintifPs fifth amended complaint[172-1] and joinder in Northrop GrttmmanCorporation Reply Memorandum in support of its motionto dismiss plaintiff's fifth amended complaint.(jp) (Entered: 11/04/2003) 197 REPLYMEMORANDUM by defendant Northrop Grummanin support i of motionto dismissplaintiff's fifth amended complaint 170-1] (jp) [ i (Entered: 11/04/2003) 198 REPLY defendant ITT Veam by LLCin support of its motion to strike portion of plaintiffs fifth amended complaint[187-I] (inch) (Entered: 11/12/2003) 199 REPLY MEMORANDUlVl by defendant ITT VeamLLCin sttpport of motion to dismiss fifth amendedcomplaint [190-1] and JOINDER in Northrop Gumman and ITT Industries Replies in support of motions Corp to dismiss plaintiffs fifth amended complaint(inch) (Entered: 11/12/2003) 200 REPLY defendant Deutsch Co to plaintiffs Opposition to motion to by dismiss plaintiff's fifth amended complaint[179-1], motionfor more definite statement [179-2] (inch) (Entered: 11/12/2003) of Sharon L Bilbeisi by defendant Deutsch Ltd, 2011 DECLARATION defendmatDeutsch Co re motion to dismiss plaintiffs fifth amended complaint [179-1], motionfor moredefinite statement [ 179-2] (mch) (Entered: 11/12/2003) 11/12/2003 203 MINUTES CHAMBERS): present case has been earmarked for (IN The reassigaamentto the Honorable Dale S Fischer. All previous dates are herebyvacated, subject to resetting ttpon issuances of the final order of transfer. Theclerk shall serve a copyof this order on all counsel/parties of record in this action by JudgeDiclcran Tevrizian CR:none present (yl) (Entered: 11/17/2003) 204 NOTICE ofreassigmnent of action form the Honorable Dickran Tew-izian to the Honorable Dale S Fischer by plaintiff Hirel ConnectorsInc (bg) (Entered: 11/17/2003)

11/03/2003

l 1/03/2003

11/10/2003

11/10/2003

1/10/2003

11/13/2003

33of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

https://ec f.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bi~DktRpt.pl? 11763716955103 CM/ECF - California CentralDistrict - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 12 of 21

11/14/2003

202 ANSWERTO AMPHENOLCORPORATION'S COUNTERCLAEVI [ 185-2] by counter-defendantHirel Connectors (p j) (Entered: Inc l i/17/2003) 20__~5 ORDER THECHIEFJUDGE 03-190 approved by Judge Consuelo OF # B. Marshall Pursumatto the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the creation of the calendarof JudgeDaleS. Fischer, this case is transfen'ed from the calendar of JudgeDickranTew'izianto the calendar of Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Thenewcase number will nowread as CV01-11069 DSF(VBKx)(cc: all counsel) Entered: 11/18/2003) 20~6 MINUTES:(IN CHAMBERS) NOTICETO COUNSEL:;Action has been randomly reassigned to the HONORABLE S FISCHER DALE pusuant to ORDER THE CHIEF JUDGE; IT IS HEREBY OF ORDERED hearing on defendant's motion(s) to dismiss [190-1], [179-1], [179-2], i [171-1], [170-1] originally notice for hearing on 11/17/03at 10:00 and vacated by the previously assigned District Judgeis herebyreset to Wednesday 12/10/03 at 1:30 in Courtroom located in the Spring Street 8D Courthouseby Judge Dale S. Fischer CR: NonePresent (ir) (Entered: 11/20/2003 ) 20-/i STIPULATION ORDER Judge Dale S. Fischer amending the and by caption to reflect the only remainingFederal Defendants Captionin this ; case is changed reflect the only remainingFederal Defendants this to in action are the United STates of Americaand DonaldH Rumsfeld,in his official capacity as Secretary of Defenseas follows: Hirel Connectors, hac., a California Corporation(Plaintiffs) vs UnitedStates of America; DonaldH Rumsfeld,in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; Sabritec; The Deutsch Company; Deutsch, Ltd; Amphenol Corporation; NorthropGrumman Corporation; Itt Industries, Inc; Tec Electronical Components Ltd; Veam Srl; VeamElektro Anschlussteclmik Gmbh;Itt Veam LLC(VeamUSA);Does 6 through 50, inclusive (Defendants) (Entered: 11/20/2003) 209 MINUTES: Chambers)Court on its ownmotion, hereby orders the (In hearing on Defendants'motions[190-1], [179-1], [179-2], [171-1], [ 170-1 ] for Wednesday 12/10/03at 1:30, rescheduled for Tuesday1/20/04 at 2:00 IS IS SO ORDERED Judge Dale S. Fischer CR: Not Present by I (ir) (Entered: 12/08/2003) 210 ANSWER filed by defendants United States of America and Donald H Rumsfeld his official capacity as Secretary of Defenseto Fifth in i Amended complaint [168-1] (ir) (Entered: 12/12/2003) 211 NOTICE INTERESTED OF PARTIES filed by defendants United States of Americaand DonaldH Rumsfeld his official capacity as Secretary of in Defense(ir) (Entered: 12/12/2003) 2 I~ MINUTES before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case called and counsel state their appearances. Court and counsel confer. Counselare ordered to meet

11/17/2003

11/19/2003

11/19/2003

12/05/2003

12/09/2003

I2/09/2003

01/20/2004

34 of 67

02/08/2006

9:33 AM

https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-binfl)ktRpt.pl? 117637169551038-... CM/ECF - Califomia CentTal Disix'ict- Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 13 of 21 and conferby 1/30/04. Joint rule 26(f) report is to be filed no later than 2/13/04. A Scheduling Conference is set for 2/23/2004 09:00 AM before HonorableDale S. Fischer. The motions are deemedunder submission. A written order will follow. Court Reporter: MargaretBabykin.(jag,) Entered: 01/26/2004) 01/23/2004 by 2i~2ORDER Judge Dale S. Fischer : (1) Grantedin part and denied in part Defendant Northrop Gramman Corporation's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Fifth Amended complaint [170] as follows: (a) Dismissal of Plaintiffs First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Ninth Causesof action is denied; (b) Dismissal of Plaintiffs Third cause of Actionis granted with prejudice and withou leave to amend;(2) Grants in part and denies in part Defendant Industries, Inc's motionto dismiss Plaintiffs Fifth ITT Amended complaint[171] as follows: (a) Dismissal of Plaintiffs First, ! Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Ninth Causesof Actionis denied; (b) Dismissal of Plaintiffs Third Causeof action is ganted with prejudice and without leave to amend;(3) Grants in part and denies in part DefendantITTVeam LLC'smotion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Fifth Amended Complaint[190] as follows: (a) Dismissalof Plaintiffs First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Ninth Causes of Action is denied. However Plaintiffmay anaend its complaint for the limited purposeof adding ITTVeam part of the definition of the as Veam Subsidiaries; (b) Dismissal of Plaintiffs Third Causesof Action granted with prejudice and without leave to amend;(4) Grantedwith Thirth Days leave to Amend Defendant Deutsch Company'smotion to dismiss Plaintiffs Fifth Amended complaint[ 179] [ 179] ; (5) Denies NorthropGrumman Corporation's motion to strike portions of Plaintiffs Fifth Amended complaint [173]; (6) DeniedITT Industries Inc's motion strike Plaintiffs Fifth Amended complaint [172]; (7) Denies ITT Veam LLC'smotionto strike portions of Plaintiffs Fifth Amended complaint [187] (ir,) (Entered: 01/26/2004)

I 01/26/2004

214 PROOF SERVICE OF Executed by plaintiffHirel Co~mectors Inc, upou ITT VeamLLC(VeamUSA)served on 10/3/2003, answer due 10/23/2003. The Summons Fifth Amended and Complaint were served by Personal service, by Statute not cited, upon MichaelP Hansen,General Manager.Due Dilligence declaration N/A. Original Summons Returned. (mch,) (Entered: 01/27/2004) 215 NOTICE FILING ORIGINAL OF Proof of Service of sumnmnsfiled by Counter DefendantHirel Co~mectors Inc. (jp,) (Entered: 01/29/2004) 21~6 STIPULATION ORDER Judge Dale S. Fischer: That Defendants AND by ITT Industries Inc and ITT Veam shall have until 2/16/04 to answer LLC Plaintiffs Fifth Amended Complaint 168].(ir, ) (Entered: 02/09/2004) [ Update AnswerDueDeadline as to ITT Industries Inc ; ITT Veam LLC. (Jr,) (Entered: 02/09/2004) 218 NOTICEOF JOINT MOTION ANDJOINT MOTION Bif~arcate to PlaintiffHiRel Co~mectors, Incs trade secret claim from its

01/26/2004 02/09/2004

02/09/2004 02/13/2004

35 of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

Civl/ECFCalifornia 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Central Report hups://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-birdDktRpt.pl? 117637169551038-_. Case District- Docket Filed 02/08/2006 Page 14 of 21 misappropriation and damagesclaim pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, MOTION Phased Discovery; Memorandum for of points and authorities in support thereof filed by DefendantsDonaldH Rumsfeld, The Departmentof Defense of The United States of America. Motionset for hearing on 3/8/2004 at 01:30 PMbefore HonorableDale S. Fischer. (stab,) (Entered: 02/20/2004) 02/13/2004 219 JOINT SCHEDULINGCONFERENCE REPORT OF THE PARTIES Rule 26(f) DiscoveryPlan Meetingfiled; estimated length of trial weeks. (stab,) (Entered: 02/20/2004) AND by 21~7 STIPULATION ORDER Judge Dale S. Fischer: Nortba'op will file and serve its special motionto strike on 3/1/04. HiRelwill file and serve its oppositionto the motionon or before 3/15/04. Northropwill file its reply on or before 3/22/04. Motion~vill be notice for hearing on 3/29/04.(ir, ) (Entered: 02/18/2004) 02/17/2004 02/17/2004 220 ANSWER Fifth AmendedComplaint and Jury Demandfiled by to Defendant Indttstries Inc.(Jr, ) (Entered: 02/23/2004) ITT 221 Notice of Interested Parties filed by DefendantITTIndustries Inc. (shb,) by

....................................... i (Entered: 02/23/2004) )2/17/2004 222 ANSWER AmendedComplaint[168] with Jury Demandfiled to Defendant, ITT Veam LLC.(shb, ) (Entered: 02/23/2004) 02/17/2004

223 SUPPLEMENTJoint Scheduling Conference Report Of The Parties to Rule26(f) DiscoveryPlan[219], filed by DefeudantsITTIndustries Iaac, ITT VeamLLC, Northrop Gmmman Vean. (ca,) (Entered: 02/25/2004) 224 MINUTES:SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; Cause called and counsel state their appearances the record. Court and counsel confer regarding for the Rule 26(f) Joint Report. Court orders only the following case managment dates be established at this time: Discoverycut-offdate: 12/28/05. Expert disclosur cut-off date 5/2/05. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure cut-off date 6/3/05. Expert discoverycut-off date 8/15/05. Dispositive motionhearing cut-offdate 9/19/05 at 1:30. Court orders the time reset on the motionto Bifurcate to 2:30 on Monday 3/8/04. Cottrt grants Plaintiff ' oral motionfor an extensiou of one day to file the Sixth Amended Complaint.Court discusses with counsel their desired settlement procedure and suggests that an agreed on outside mediator maybe consideration by Judge Dale S. Fischer Court Reporter: Lucille Litsheim. (ir,) (Entered: 02/27/2004)

02/23/2004

02/23/2004

226 OPPOSITION MOTION Bifurcate PlaintiffHiRel Connectors, Incs to to trade secret claim from its misappropriation and damages claim pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure MOTION for Discovery MOTION Discovery[218] filed by plaintiffHirel for Comaectors Inc. (sv,) (Entered: 03/02/2004)

36 of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

CM/ECF CaliforniaCase 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Central District - DocketReport

https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl? 21 Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 15 of 117637169551038-...

02/24/2004

225 SIXTHAMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants United States of America,DonaldH Rumsfeld,Secretary of Defense in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, Sabritec, TheDetttsch Company, Deutsch Ltd, Ampbenol Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, ITT Iaadustries Inc, Tec Electrical Components Ltd, Veam SRL,Veam Elecktro Anscblusstechnik GmbH,ITT VeamLLC(VeamUSA); Does through 50; Parties Robert MHeber; Keith WLippert; Northrop Grumman Vean; Northrap Grumman Veam; The Department of Defense of The United States of America; Alan S Thompson;AbdoAbdouniand EdwardEdwardC. Aldridge, Doe 5 terminated amending Fifth Amended Complaint [168] ; Jttry Demand filed by PlaintiffHirel ConnectorsInc (ir, (Entered: 02/27/2004) 227 NOTICE MOTION MOTION strike Plaintiff complaint and OF AND to attorney Fees filed by Defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 3/29/2004 at 01:30 PM. Memorandum Points and of Authorities. (it,) (Entered: 03/08/2004) 228 COMPENDIUM of Exhibits in support of its motion to strike [227] filed by Defendant Nortl~rop Grumman Corporation. Declaration of Daniel W Park (ir,) (Entered: 03/08/2004) 230 REPLY support of Joint Motions and Joint MOTION Bifurcate in to Plaintiff HiRelComaectors, Incs trade secret claim fromits misappropriation and damagesclaim pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure MOTION phased Discovery[218] filed by for Defendants Donald H Rumsfeld, United States of America. (inch,)

03/02/2004

03/02/2004

03/02/2004

..................... i (Entered:03/11/2004) 03/02/2004 231 DECLAP,_A.TION ofAbdonasser Abdouniin support of Reply in support of Joint Motionand Joint MOTION Bifurcate Plaintiff HiRel to Connectors,Incs trade secret claim from its misappropriationmad damages claim pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure MOTION phased Discovery[218] filed by Defendants for DonaldH Rumsfeld,United States of America. (inch,) (Entered: 03/11/2004) 03/02/2004 232 DECLARATION ofVince Farhat in support of Reply in support of Joint Motionsand Joint MOTION Bifurcate Plaintiff HiRel Connectors, Iaacs to trade secret claim from its misappropriationand damages claim pttrsuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure MOTION for phased Discovery[218] filed by Defendants Donald H Rumsfeld, United States of America.(mcb,) (Entered: 03/I 1/2004) 234 NOTICEOF COURT ROOM CHANGE filed by Plaintiff ConnectorsImc. (yl,) (Entered: 03/15/2004) Hirel

03/05/2004 03/08/2004

229 MINUTES: Defendant motion to Bifurcate is DENIED without prejudice. Defendants alternative motion for Phased Discovery [218] is GRANTED by Judge Dale S. Fischer Court Reporter: Amber Leandra. (ir,) (Entered: 03/09/2004)

37 of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

htlps://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-biWDktRpt.pl? 117637169551038-... CM/ECF - California CentralDistrict - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 16 of 21 23_3 STIPULATION ORDER Judge Victor B. Kenton: regarding AND by Protective Order. All deadlines for parties containedherein are subject to modification by the Court. If any party wishes to designate a document as "confidential" based on asserted invasion of a right to privacy, tbat party mayfile an application with tbe Court seeldgn an approval of such designation. Other party mayfile objection within a Joint Stipulation fonnat.(ir, ) (Entered: 03/15/2004) 235 ANSWER Sixth AmendedComplaint [225] with Jury Demandfiled by to defendantDeutschLtd.(jp, ) (Entered: 0.~/1" 6/2004) 236 ANSWER Sixtb AmendedComplaint [225] with Jury Demandfiled by to defendant Deutsch Co.(jp, ) (Entered: 03/16/2004) 237 APPLICATION Order directing opposition to Northrop motion to for trike complaintbe filed nnder seal filed by PlaintiffHirel Connectors Inc. LodgedProposedOrder, HiRel opposition to Northrop motion to strike the complaint. (ir,) (Entered: 03/17/2004) 238 DECLARATIONFred Baumannin opposition to Defendant motion to of Strike complaint[227] filed by PlaintiffHirel Connectors Inc. (ir,) (Entered: 03/17/2004) 239 DECLARATION of Hank Mathias regarding motion to Strike [227] filed by PlaintiffHirel ConnectorsInc. (ir,) (Entered: 03/17/2004) 240 EXPARTE APPLICATION file oversized brief twenty-nine pages in to length filed by Plaintiff Hirel Comaectors Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (ir, ) (Entered: 03/17/2004) of Joel R Bennett in support ofEx Parte Application to 241 DECLARATION file oversizedbrief twenty-ninepagesin length [240] filed by Plaintiff Hirel Com~ectors Inc. (ir,) (Entered: 03/17/2004) 242 1 ORDER Judge Dale S. Fischer: Ex Parte Application to file oversized by brief twenty-nine pages in length [240] is DENIED(ir, (Entered: ) 03/17/2004) 24_3 ORDER Judge Dale S. Fiscber: Application for Order directing by opposition to Northropmotionto strike complaintbe filed under seal [237] is granted. Plaintiffopposition to Northropmotionto strike , complaintis orderedfiled nnder seal. (ir,) (Entered: 03/17/2004) 245 RECEIPTOF REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT proceedings for the of following dates: 3/8/04 Court Reporter: Leandra Amber (weap,) (Entered: 03/18/2004) .03/17/2004 03/22/2004 TRANSCRYPT for proceedings held on 3/8/04. Court Reporter: filed Leandra Amber.(weap,) (Entered: 03/18/2004) 247 REPLY BRIEFIN SUPPORT It's Special Motion to Strike[227]; of Declaration of Daniel W. Park filed by DefendmatNorthrop Grumman Corporation. (yl,) (Entered: 03/26/2004)

03/12/2004

03/15/2004 03/15/2004 03/15/2004

03/15/2004

03/15/2004 03/15/2004

03/15/2004

-03/16/2004

03/16/2004

38of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

htlps://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl? 117637169551038-... CM/ECF - California CentralDistrict - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 17 of 21 03/22/2004 03/23/2004 248 STATUS REPORT REGARDING Phased Discovery filed Donald H Rumsfeld. (yl,) (Entered: 03/26/2004) by Defendant

246 RECEIPTOF REPORTERS TILANSCRgPT proceedings for the of following dates: 2/23/04 Court Reporter: Lucille Litsheim (weap,) (Entered: 03/26/2004) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 2/23/04. Court Reporter: filed Lucille Litsheim. (weap,) (Entered: 03/26/2004) 249 NOTICE MOTION MOTION an Order Compelling Plaintiff OF AND for to Define Its AllegedTrade Secrets With"ReasonableParticularity" filed by defendants Amphenol Corporation, Deutsch Co, Deutsch Ltd, ITT hadustries Inc, ITT Veam LLC,Nortbxop Grunaman Corporation, Donald H Rumsfeld,Sabritec, United States of America. Motionset for hearing on 4/19/2004at 01:30 PM.(nhac,) (Entered: 03/30/2004) 250 DECLARATION of Joel R. Bennett in support of Opposition to Defendants' ProposedOrder Granting Phased Discovery [218] filed by plaintiffHirel ConnectorsInc. (nhac,) (Entered: 03/30/2004) 251 OPPOSITION Defendants' Proposed Order Granting Phased Discovery to [218] filed by plaintiffHirel Connectors la~c. (nhac,) (Entered: 03/30/2004) 252 MINUTES: Order by Judge Dale S. Fischer DENYING Northrop Grumman Corporation's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs ComplaintPursuant to California Codeof Civil ProcedureSection 425.16 [227]. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth...(in this minuteorder), the Court DENIES Northrop Grumman's Motionto Strike Plaintiffs ComplaintPursuant to California Codeof Civil ProcedureSection 425.16. See documentsfor further details. Court Reporter: Lucille Litsheim. (nhac,) (Entered: 03/31/2004) Order by Judge Dale S. Fischer ganting defendants' Joint Motionsto Bifurcate, or in tbe alternative, for PhasedDiscovery[218], and good cause appearing, no~v hereby Orders phased discovery as follows: 1)Discoveryin this action shall be conductedin phases; 2)Thefirst phase of discoverysball be limited to only that discoverydirected to existence and validity of HiRel'salleged trade secret(s) (See documents further for details). The parties shall completePhase Onediscoveryby no later than 7/5/04; At the conclusion of Phase One, any motion brought by any party for summary adjttdication on the issue of the existence and validity of HiRel'salleged trade secret(s) shall be filed and served in time to be beard by the Court by no later than 8/30/04; Anyfurther discoveryin this action beyondthat expressly permitted during Phase Oneis hereby stayed pendinga ruling by the Court on all motions for summary adjudication nn the issue of the existence and validity of HiRel'salleged trade secret.(nhac, ) (Entered: 04/01/2004)

03/23/2004 03/26/2004

03/26/2004

03/26/2004

03/29/2004

03/31/2004

39of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl? 117637169551038-._ CM/ECF - California Centa'al District - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 18 of 21 255 APPLICATION an Order Directing PlaintiffHirel Connector's For Identification of TradeSecrets Be Filed UnderSeal filed by plaintiffHirel Connectorsl~c. (nhac,) (Entered: 04/06/2004) 258 ORDER Judge Dale S. Fischer GRANTING by Plaintiff's Application for an Order Directing PlaintiffHirel Comaector's Identification of Trade Secrets Be Filed UnderSeal.(nhac, ) (Entered: 04/12/2004) 254 OPPOSITION MOTION an Order Compelling Plaintiffto to for Define Its AllegedT~adeSecrets With"ReasonableParticularity' [249] filed by i plaintiffHirel Connectors hac. (jp,) (Entered: 04/06/2004) 256 RECENT REPORTERS OF TRANSCRIPT proceedings for the of following dates: 3/29/04 Court Reporter: Lucille Litsheim (weap,) (Entered: 04/09/2004) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 3/29/04. Conrt Reporter: filed Lucille Litsheim. (weap,) (Entered: 04/09/2004) 262 APPLICATION an order directing portion of Defendants' Reply in for Support of Motionfor an Order Compelling Plaintiffto Define its Alleged Trade Secrets with "ReasonableParticularity" and Declaration of Seth E. Freilich be filed under seal filed by defendantUnitedStates of America. LodgedProposed Order and seal document. (nhac,) (Entered: 04/15/2OO4) 25_._29ORDER Judge Dale S. Fischer that defendants' request for an order by directing the Clerk to file under seal Portion of Defendants' Replyin Support of Motionfor an Order CompellingPlaintiffto Define its Alleged Trade Secrets with "ReasonableParticularity" and Declaration of Seth E. Freilich be filed under seal by the Cleric of the Court [262] is GRANTED, and the Cleric of the Court is herebyorderedto file the sameunderseal. (nhac,) Modifiedon 4/15/2004(rdaac,). (Entered: 04/15/2004) 261 REPLY Support of Motion for an Order CompellingPlaintiffto Define in Its Alleged Trade Secrets With"ReasonableParticularity" [249] and Declaration of Ian R. Barrett in SnpportThereoffiled by defendants DonaldH Rumsfeld, United States of America. (nhac,) (Entered: 04/15/2004) 263 REQUEST guidance from the Court re: issue of the effect of the for pendingmotionto compelfnrther disclosure ofplaintifftrade secrets with respect to defendantsobligation to make initial disclosnres before initiating discoveryfiled by plaintiff Hirel Cormectors (jp,) (Entered: Inc. 04/16/2004) 266 JOINDER Defendant Norhrop Gramman in Corporation's Response to Plaintiffs Reqnestfor Guidance (filed on 4/14/04) [267] filed defendant Amphenol Corporation. 0~ac, ) Modified on 4/26/2004 (nhac, ). (Entered: 04/26/2004)

03/31/2004

04/01/2004

04/05/2004

04/08/2004

04/08/2004 04/12/2004

04/14/2004

04/14/2004

04/14/2004

04/16/2004

40 of 67

02/08/2006 Aivl 9:33

hups://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bi~/DktRpt.pl? 117637169551038-... CM/ECF - California CentralDistrict - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 19 of 21

04/16/2004

267 RESPONSE Plaintiffs Request for Guidance[263] (filed on 4/14/04) to filed by defendm~tsITT Industries Inc, ITT Veam LLC,Northrop Grumman Corporation. (nhac,) (Entered: 04/26/2004) Order 264 MINUTES: by Judge Dale S. Fischer. For the reasons set forth in this Order, the Court GRANTS Defendm~ts-'Motionfor an Order Compelliug Plaintiff to Define Its Alleged Trade Secrets With "Reasonable Particularity" [249]. It is therefore Ordered:1)Plaintiff shall identify its alleged trade secrets with "resouableparticularity" by 3:00 pm on 4/26/04; 2)Plaintiffs trade secret desi~ation shall be filed under seal ~ and personallysecvedon all defendants;3)Plaintiffs trade secret designation shall be signed by counsel pursum~tto Rule 11 of the FRCP; and 4)Plaintiffs trade secret designationshall identify those specific elementsof the HiRelConnector that plaintiff contendsare trade secrets in this action, includingall relevant details of the alleged trade secrets such as dimensionsand tolerances. See documents further details. for Court Reporter: Kathy Stride. (nhac,) (Entered: 04/20/2004) Order by Judge Dale S. Fischer Regarding Plaintiff Hirel 265 MINUTES: Com~ectors, Inc's RequestFor Guidance[263]. In response to the Request for Guidance,the Court orders the following: It is nowordered that defendauts,or their designatedrepresentative, advise plaintiff and the Court, no later thau 5/3/04 at 3:00 pm, whetherthe trade secrets have now been defined adequately for the present purposes. If so, plaintiffmay immediately commence discovery. If not, the parties (plaintiff and one or moredesiguated representatives of defendants) are ordered to appear in Courtroom on May7 at 2:00 pm. Plaintiff is to bring the infomaation 840 and documents providedto plaintiffs in response to the Order. Plaintiff is also to bring an officer of plaintiff or other personsufficiently knowledgeable concerningplaintiffs trade secrets so that such person could provide the Court with any infom~ationit needs to resolve issues relating to the trade secrets. Defendm~ts but are not required to, bring may, one or moresimilarly l~m~vledgeable representatives. At the time the Court xvill detemfinewhetherplaintiff has complied with the Court's Order and whether plaintiffmay commence discovery. The reference of discovery matters to the Magistrate judge is vacated. Tbecourt advises that resolution of this matter has beensignificantly delayedthus far, and that further delay will be goundsfor sanctions, including preclusion orders. See documents further details. Court Reporter: KathyStride. for (nhac,) (Entered: 04/20/2004) 269 RECEIPTOF REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT proceedings for the of following dates: 4/19/04 Court Reporter: Katherine M. Stride (weap,) (Entered: 04/28/2004) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 4/19/04. Court Reporter: filed Katherine M.Stride. (~veap,) (Entered: 04/28/2004) REPORT Regarding Order Compelling Plaintiff To Define Its 274 STATUS Alleged Trade Secrets With "ReasonableParticularity" filed by

04/19/2004

04/19/2004

04/27/2004

04/27/2004 05/04/2004

41of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

CM/ECF California -

Central District - Docket Report Case 1:05-cv-01170-JFM

https://ec f.cacd,uscourts.gov/cgi-bi~'Dk~Rpt.pl? 21 Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 20 of 117637169551038-...

Defendants DonaldH Rumsfeld, United States of America. Declaration of Vince Farhat (nhac,) (Entered: 05/11/2004) 0510612004 270 PROPOSED Protocol For Trade Secret Identification Hearing filed by Defendants United States of Americaand Donald H Rumsfeld. (nhac,) (Entered: 05/07/2004) 271 RESPONSE by PlaintiffHirel Connectors Inc to Defendants' Status filed Report [248]. (nhac,) (Entered: 05/07/2004) 272 NOTICE Interested Parties filed by Defendalat Northrop Grumnaan of Corporation. 0~aac, ) (Entered: 05/07/2004) 273 ANSWER Sixth Amended to Complaint [225] with Jury Trial filed by defendant Northrop Grumman Corporation.(nhac, ) (Entered: 05/10/2004) Status Conference Re Order Compelling Plaintiff To Define 275 MINUTES: Its Alleged Trade Secrets With"ReasonableParticular" by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Thecase is called and counsel state their appearances.TheCourt confirmswith counsel their concurrenceto conductthis matter off the record and the com~ report will be on stand-by, if required. Court Reporter: Lisa Gonzalez. (nhac,) (Entered: 05/13/2004) 277 NOTICE TakingDeposition of Plaintiff Hirel ConnectorsInc. filed by of defendants DonaldH Rumsfeld, United States of America. (nhac,) (Entered: 05/28/2004) to 279 JOINTOBJECTION Plaintiffs Trade Secret Designation filed by Defendants Deutsch Co, Deutsch Ltd. Declaration of Charles C. McKenna and Exhibits in support thereof. Lodged ProposedOrder. (nhac,) (Entered: 06/03/2004) by discover5, 278 ORDER Judge Dale S. Fischer that Plaintiff maycommence as of 5/24/04, and that such commencement discovery does not of constitute a waiverby Defendants may all rights to assert that of and Plaintiff has failed to complywith the requirementsof CCP 2019(d).(nhac, ) (Entered: 06/03/2004) 280 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Hirel Connectors Inc to Defendants Joint filed Objection to Plaintiffs Trade Secret Designation[279] (nhac,) (Entered: 06/09/2004) STIPULATION RE: PROTECTIVE ORDERby Judge 281 AMENDED Victor B. Kenton...that the parties have ageed to modifyand supersede the Original Protective Orderto provide that all documents producedto date in this litigation designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS ONLY EYES under the terms of the Original Protective Order and/or documents filed under seal with Court are available for reviewby representative of the parties. For clairity such documents will now be designated as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION-LIMITED ACCESS ONLY...(see documents for further details).0flaac, ) (Entered: 06/14/2004)

I

05/06/2004 05/06/2004 05/06/2004

~ 05/07/2004

05/21/2004

05/27/2004

i 06/02/2004

06/03/2004

06/09/2004

42 of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM

CM/ECF CaliforniaCase 1:05-cv-01170-JFM Central District - DocketReport

https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-birdDk+~Rpt.pl?i17637169551038-... Document 7-4 Filed 02/08/2006 Page 21 of 21

06/29/2004

282 STIPULATION ORDER AND regarding

Depositions and Written

I Discoveryby Judge Dale S. Fischer. Goodcause having been shown, the foregoing Stipulation RegardingDepositions and Written Discoveryin this case is approved.See documents further details.(ttbac, ) (Entered: for 06/30/2004) 07/13/2004 286 NOTICEOF MOTION ANDMOTION Withdraw the automatic to admissionsresulting fromdelay in responseto plaintiffs first set of requests for admissions filed by defendants DeutschCo, Deutsch Ltd. Motionset for hearing on 8/16/2004 at 01:30 PMbefore HonorableDale S. Fischer. LodgedProposed Order. (ca,) (Entered: 07/21/2004) 287 DECLARATION Charles C. McKennain support of MOTION of to Withdraw automatic admissionresttlting fiom delay in response to the plaintiffs first set or requests for admissions [286] filed by defendants Deutsch Co, Deutsch Ltd. (ca,) (Entered: 07/21/2004) I DECLARATIONJack Smart in support of MOTION Withdraxv the of to automaticadmissionresulting fromdelay in sresponseto plaintffs first set or requests for admissions [286] filed by defendants DeutschCo, Deutsch Ltd. (ca,) (Entered: 07/21/2004) 283 MINUTES: court refers all future discovery matters to the magistrate The judge. The motion of Defendmatthe Deutsch Company withdra~v the to AutomaticAdmission Resulting from delay in response to Plaintiffs first set of Requestsfor Admissions referred to the magistrate judge. By is Judge Dale S. Fischer : Court Reporter: NonePresent. (pj,) (Entered: 07/16/2004) 07/16/2004 284 STIPULATION REGARDINGPHASE ONE SCHEDULING AND ORDER Judge Dale S. Fischer : HiRel and the Defendants agree to an by extension of the "Phase One"discovery period such that the "Phase One" discovery period shall conclndeon 7/30/04, with the sole exception that HiRel maytake the depositions of Deutsch witnesses Colin Williamson madWilliamBecker on 8/6/04, continuing on 8/7/04 if necessary and HiReland the Defendants agree to maextension of filing, service and hearing deadlines for any Motionsfor Summary Adjudication and/or Summary Jud~mnent follows: The Defendmats as shall file madhand serve any Motions for Summary Adjudication and/or Summary Jud~nent on or before 8/16/04; HiRelshall file and hand serve Oppositionsto any Motions for Summary Adjudication and/or Summary Judgment on or before 8/30/04; the Defendants shall file and mail serve Replies in support of any Motions for Summary Adjudication and/or Summary Judganent on or before 9/8/04; and any Motions for Summary Adjudciation and/or Summary Jud~mnentshall be heard on 9/20/04. Goodcause having been shown, the foregoing Stipulation RegardingPhase OneScheduling in the case of HiRel IT IS SO ORDERED(rl, (Entered: 07/19/2004) ) 285 MINUTES Chambers)before Judge Victor B. Kenton : This matter (ha has beenreferred to the MagistrateJudge. TheParties are advisedthat it is

07/13/2004

i 07/19/2004 !

43 of 67

02/08/2006 9:33 AM