Free Scheduling Order - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 23.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: June 14, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 325 Words, 2,024 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/21007/9.pdf

Download Scheduling Order - District Court of Federal Claims ( 23.4 kB)


Preview Scheduling Order - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:06-cv-00103-LJB

Document 9

Filed 06/14/2006

Page 1 of 2

In the United States Court of Federal Claim
No. 06-103 C (Filed June 14, 2006) ********************* LYDIA Y. BAGLEY, et. al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * ********************* PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER On June 5, 2006, the parties, pursuant to Appendix A, ΒΆ 4 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) filed their joint preliminary status report (JPSR) by leave of the court. Therein, the parties reported that they do not intend to file motions pursuant to RCFC 12(b) or 12(c) and, on April 7, 2006, plaintiff's counsel delivered a proposed settlement agreement to defendant which, if approved, would settle all issues except for the driving issue.1 Plaintiffs' counsel states that if the settlement agreement is not approved by August 31, 2006, he intends to file a dispositive motion by October 31, 2006. Defendant reports that the government anticipates responding to plaintiffs' proposed settlement agreement by August 31, 2006.

/ The parties propose to defer litigation of the driving time issue pending the outcome of the appeal of this issue in Stephen S. Adams v. United States, No. 90-162 and consolidated cases, appeal docketed, No. 06-5040 (Fed. Cir.), and also in James J. Aaron v. United States, No. 96-373, appeal docketed, No. 06-5041 (Fed. Cir.), a case which has been consolidated with Adams, No. 90-162.

1

Case 1:06-cv-00103-LJB

Document 9

Filed 06/14/2006

Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Defendant is directed to respond to plaintiffs' proposed settlement agreement on or before August 31, 2006. Absent the approval of the settlement agreement, plaintiffs' counsel shall be allowed to FILE a dispositive motion on or before October 31, 2006. Further proceedings relating to work-home driving issues and damages shall be DEFERRED pending the resolution of Adams v. United States, No. 90-162C.

(2)

(3)

s/Lynn J. Bush LYNN J. BUSH Judge

2