Free Trial Management Order - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 29.0 kB
Pages: 3
Date: September 26, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,392 Words, 8,549 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/21214/13.pdf

Download Trial Management Order - District Court of Federal Claims ( 29.0 kB)


Preview Trial Management Order - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:06-cv-00305-MBH

Document 13

Filed 09/26/2006

Page 1 of 3

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
ORDER The court is in receipt of the parties' September 11, 2006 joint preliminary status report, and held a status conference in the above-captioned case on September 26, 2006. During the conference, the parties advised the court of other cases with the same leasein/lease-out (LILO) transaction, which have been filed and which may be filed in the future. The parties shall report any new LILO cases, regardless of forum, and shall report any decision in these cases within five days of the decision. In addition, on or before Monday, January 8, 2007, the parties shall file a joint status report, reflecting their discovery progress, a list of pending LILO cases, with appropriate courts and docket nos. identified, settlement possibilities in this case, and any other pertinent matters. Furthermore, the court establishes the following SCHEDULE. Fact discovery shall close on Friday, February 23, 2007. The parties shall file a joint status report on or before Friday, March 2, 2007, reflecting the completion of fact discovery and, if appropriate, the possibility of settlement. In addition, the status report shall indicate whether either or both of the parties intend(s) to file a motion for summary judgment. If either party indicates summary judgment as fully dispositive of the case is appropriate, the court will schedule a status conference. If together with the parties, the court determines that a fully dispositive summary judgment motion is appropriate, the parties shall file a joint stipulation of facts with a supporting appendix, setting forth specific stipulations of agreed upon facts with appropriate citations to documents in the appendix to identify whether there are disputed material facts in the case. The parties also shall submit a joint statement of issues of law. For both submissions, the parties are to separately identify, if necessary, any statement of fact or issue of law which is not agreed upon by both parties, but which one party believes to be at issue in the case, in order to assist the parties and the court to determine whether the case is ripe for summary judgment or whether there are material facts in dispute which would preclude summary judgment. The joint stipulation of facts is to be filed instead of the moving party's proposed findings of uncontroverted fact and the opposing party's response to the proposed findings of uncontroverted fact. Prior to the filing of any motions for summary judgment, the court will schedule an additional status

* * * * * * * * * * *

No. 06-305T Filed: September 26, 2006

Case 1:06-cv-00305-MBH

Document 13

Filed 09/26/2006

Page 2 of 3

conference to discuss the proposed motion. If neither party intends to file a dispositive motion in this case, the parties shall so indicate in their March 2, 2007 joint status report. Any amendments to the pleadings already submitted or any motions related to this court's third-party practice rules, RCFC 14, are to be filed with the court on or before Friday, March 2, 2007. Expert discovery shall close Friday, June 29, 2007. The parties shall file a joint status report on or before Friday, July 6, 2007, reflecting the completion of all discovery. If all matters in this case are not settled or previously resolved, the court SCHEDULES a trial in this case to commence on Wednesday, October 10, 2007, at 9:00 a.m., and to continue through Friday, November 2, 2007, or until all evidence is taken, in electronic courtroom 6, located on the fifth floor of the Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717 Madison Place, NW, Washington, DC. The Appendix A filings detailed in the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), are modified as described below. The filings with the court are to include: a. Witness List. On or before Friday, August 10, 2007, the parties shall file a joint statement setting forth a list of witnesses to be called at trial, other than those to be used exclusively for impeachment. As to each witness, the parties shall indicate the party for which the witness will be testifying, the specific topics to be addressed in the expected testimony and the time needed for direct examination. The parties also shall indicate whether or not they are willing to take overlapping witnesses who are to be called for both the plaintiff and the defendant at one sitting, as discussed at the conference. b. Issues of Fact and Law. On or before Friday, August 10, 2007, the parties shall file a joint statement of the issues of fact and law to be decided by this court. The statement of issues shall control the admissibility of evidence at trial and evidence will be deemed to be irrelevant unless it pertains to one or more of the issues. c. Stipulations. On or before Friday, August 10, 2007, The parties shall file a joint stipulation of facts containing separately numbered paragraphs covering all matters to which the parties have been able to stipulate during the course of proceedings. The court urges the parties to achieve joint stipulations to the fullest extent possible in order to reduce the time required for trial. d. Joint Trial Exhibit List. On or before Friday, August 10, 2007, the parties shall file a joint trial exhibit list divided into the following five sections: (1) Joint stipulated exhibits, to be numbered starting with 1-99 or 1-999, as needed. The court urges the parties to achieve as many joint exhibits as possible in order to reduce the time required for trial. (2) Plaintiff's exhibits, to be numbered starting with 100-199, or 1000-1999, the number sequence to begin following the completion of the sequence of numbers used for the joint exhibits;

Case 1:06-cv-00305-MBH

Document 13

Filed 09/26/2006

Page 3 of 3

(3) Defendant's exhibits, to be numbered 200-299 or 2000-2999, the number sequence to begin following the completion of the sequence of numbers used for the plaintiff's exhibits; (4) Plaintiff's objections to defendant's exhibits, including the basis for each objection; and (5) objection. Defendant's objections to plaintiff's exhibits, including the basis for each

The actual exhibits shall not be submitted to the clerk's office or to chambers, but shall be brought to the trial by the parties in sufficient copies, including one copy for the witness, two copies for the court and the official copy to be submitted to the court reporter. The exhibits shall be bound or placed in a loose leaf notebook(s) with each exhibit sequentially numbered and all pages of each exhibit sequentially numbered, starting with page one of the first exhibit through the last page of the last exhibit. Loose submissions, such as maps, photographs, physical evidence and charts, may be submitted. Reduced copies of charts and photographs should be included in the bound volumes, if possible. e. Deposition Testimony. On or before Friday, August 10, 2007, any party intending to present substantive evidence by way of deposition testimony, other than as provided by Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d), shall serve and file a separate motion for leave to file the transcript of this testimony. The motion shall show cause why the deposition testimony should be admitted and identify specifically the portion of the transcript the party intends to use at trial. The opposing party may file a response to this motion. Sufficient copies of proposed deposition pages for use at trial must be brought to the trial by the party intending to use such deposition testimony. f. Responses. The parties are expected to confer and cooperate in the preparation of the above described documents. Any responses to matters raised by the opposing party should, therefore, be included in each party's initial submission. However, if anything new or unexpected is discovered, it may be addressed in a brief response which must be filed under cover of a motion for leave of the court to file the response, immediately upon making the discovery. The court SCHEDULES a pre-trial conference for Tuesday, September 11, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. Counsel for both parties may appear by telephone. Unless otherwise notified, the court will contact plaintiff's counsel at (312) 701-7216 and defendant's counsel at (202) 616-3448. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Marian Blank Horn MARIAN BLANK HORN Judge