Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 75.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: October 23, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 462 Words, 2,846 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/21243/23.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims ( 75.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:06-cv-00334-LJB

Document 23

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ____________________________________ ) DOUGLAS S. JOHNSON ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)

Case No. 06-334C (Judge Lynn J. Bush)

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal, plaintiff respectfully requests a 90-day enlargement of time, to and including January 21, 2008, within which the parties may file a settlement in this case or report on the status of the settlement negotiations. Plaintiff has submitted a settlement proposal to defendant that is pending review by the Department of Justice. The parties= dispositive motions are currently due on October 24, 2007, but neither party anticipates that the matter will be litigated given that the far more numerous claims of similarly situated plaintiffs have been settled. Counsel for defendant has indicated that defendant is not opposed to this motion. Plaintiff=s counsel requests this enlargement because the claims of similarly situated plaintiffs in Boyer v. United States, No. 00-641C, have been settled and additional time is needed for the Department of Justice to review the settlement. As stated in the parties= joint preliminary status report, Mr. Johnson has been employed by the same agency as plaintiffs in Boyer, served in the same position as the plaintiffs in Boyer (Senior Marine Enforcement Officer), and asserts claims that are identical to those asserted in Boyer. Because the claims in

Case 1:06-cv-00334-LJB

Document 23

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 2 of 3

Boyer have been settled, the parties do not anticipate the need to file summary judgment motions in this case. Therefore, plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant an enlargement of time of 90 days within which to report back to the Court with a settlement or the status of settlement, or file a dispositive motion, through and including January 21, 2008. Respectfully submitted, OF COUNSEL: Linda Lipsett

Jules Bernstein Bernstein & Lipsett, P.C. 1920 L Street, N.W. Suite 303 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 296-1798 s/Edgar James Edgar James James & Hoffman, P.C. 1101-17th Street, N.W. Suite 510 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-0500 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: October 23, 2007

-2-

Case 1:06-cv-00334-LJB

Document 23

Filed 10/23/2007

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that on this 28th day of August 2007, a copy of the foregoing AMOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME@ was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court=s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court=s system.

s/Edgar James