Free Notice (Other) - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 42.8 kB
Pages: 9
Date: September 28, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 4,311 Words, 28,188 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/21901/20-3.pdf

Download Notice (Other) - District Court of Federal Claims ( 42.8 kB)


Preview Notice (Other) - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:06-cv-00934-FMA

Document 20-3

Filed 09/28/2007

Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS No. 06-945L 06-cv-934 L (Filed: May 11,2007) NAVAJO NATION KAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA f.k.a. NAVAJO TRIBE OF INDIANS, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES,

Defendant. CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the parties' Joint Motion for Entry of a Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order. The Court has reviewed the Motion and finds that good cause exists for approval and entry of the Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order pursuant to RCFC 26(c) and RCFC 16(c)(3). Entry of this Order will facilitate efficient discovery and authorize production of confidential and proprietary records while protecting them from further disclosure consistent with Applicable Confidentiality Laws, as defined below, and will avoid waivers of exemptions from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Scope and Definitions. This Order shall govern production in this case of records in either party's possession, custody, or control. It shall limit use and further disclosure, both within and outside of alternative dispute resolution proceedings, of records that a party receives pursuant to this Order. This Order shall not govern production, use, or disclosure of records within the possession, custody, or control of Arthur Andersen, LLP, as of the date of this Order. (a) "record" defined. As used in this Order, "record" means any book, bill, calendar, chart, check, compilation, computation, computer or network activity log, correspondence, data, database, diagram, diary, document, draft, drawing, e-mail, file, folder, film, graph, graphic presentation, image, index, inventory, invoice, jotting, journal, ledger, machine readable material, map, memo, metadata, minutes, note, order, paper, photograph, printout, recording, report, spreadsheet, statement, summary, telephone message record or log, transcript, video, voicemail, voucher, webpage, work paper, writing, or worksheet, or any other item or group of documentary material or information, regardless of physical or electronic format or characteristic, and any

Case 1:06-cv-00934-FMA

Document 20-3

Filed 09/28/2007

Page 2 of 9

information therein, and copies, notes, and recordings thereof. 2. (b) "Applicable Confidentiality Laws" defined. As used in this Order, "Applicable Confidentiality Laws" means the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, including information related to Individual Indian Money (IIM) accounts; the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1905; certain provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 470w-3; the Archeological Resources Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. § 470hh(a); the Indian Mineral Development Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2103(c); the Mineral Leasing Act, 30 U.S.C. § 181 et seq. 208-1; the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, 30 U.S.C. § 1201; the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982 as amended ("FOGRMA") 30 U.S.C. 1701, 1733(c), and the Defense Production Act, 50 U.S.C. App. § 2 155(e); any regulation promulgated pursuant to any of the above Acts; and any other federal statute or regulation which protects federal records from public disclosure. Confidential business information or materials that relate to Indian Tribes and/or Indian individuals not parties to this litigation are covered under Applicable Confidentiality Laws. The attorney-client privilege, the deliberative process privilege, and the attorney work-product doctrine are not Applicable Confidentiality Laws. 3. Documents, data, and other materials containing information that a party asserts and designates as being subject to protection from disclosure as defined by Applicable Confidentiality Laws will hereinafter be termed "Confidential Materials" for purposes of this Order. 2 4. Production Authority. Any records that either party asserts are protected from disclosure by Applicable Confidentiality Laws are hereby authorized to be produced subject to the provisions of this Order. 3. Privilege Review, Log, and Redactions. Within a reasonable period of time after receipt of a request for access to records, whether by name, category, location, or otherwise, the responding party shall review the records and, as it completes privilege review, provide to the requesting party one or more privilege logs that list such records for which the responding party asserts privilege or protection from disclosure, provided that pursuant to paragraph 2 above such assertion of privilege or protection shall not rely on any Applicable Confidentiality Laws. Such reasonable period of time shall not exceed 90 days unless otherwise agreed by the parties or ordered by the Court. Such privilege logs shall state for each listed record and any attachments thereto the date, recipient(s) (if known), author(s) (if known), privilege(s) asserted, a description of the content of the record sufficient to demonstrate the subject matter(s) addressed in the record and the basis of the asserted privilege or protection from disclosure, and information related to the location from which the record was obtained. Thereafter, the parties will confer to address any issue related to the privilege log(s) and to address the provision of copies of records for which the responding party asserts privilege or protection from disclosure, with redactions only of portions thereof that the responding party asserts to be privileged or protected. 4. Notification and Access. Concurrently with providing a privilege log -2-

Case 1:06-cv-00934-FMA

Document 20-3

Filed 09/28/2007

Page 3 of 9

pursuant to paragraph 3 above, the responding party shall notify the requesting party that the records subject to the access request under paragraph 3 are available for access at a designated place under designated terms. Pursuant to RCFC 34(b), the responding party shall then promptly provide the requesting party access to all such records for which the responding party does not assert privilege or protection from disclosure, in their entirety. The responding party shall provide such record access to the requesting party's attorneys, paralegals, experts, consultants, and contractors (hereinafter, "Researchers") as the requesting party's attorneys may direct at dates and times agreeable to the parties. Any records made available for a party's access shall be deemed confidential for purposes of the access. 5. Agency Access Procedures. Record access at offices of the parties' agencies shall be governed by established research procedures and agreements of the responding party or the relevant agency thereof unless the requesting party has a special need for alternative procedures or agreements, and provided that the agency access procedures as written, interpreted, or applied shall not limit or delay production under RCFC 34 or this Order. The responding party shall provide copies of such procedures and agreements to the requesting party within a reasonable amount of time after identification of locations or agencies relevant to a particular access request. Each Researcher shall review any applicable access procedures and sign an applicable access agreement before being provided access to records pursuant to this paragraph unless otherwise agreed in writing or ordered by the Court. 5. Plaintiff shall not use the Confidential Materials, or their contents, for any purpose, other than this litigation (including any ADR process, informal settlement discussions, and appeals therein) or any related administrative proceedings before the Interior Department, if any. Any information contained in the Confidential Materials shall be kept strictly confidential by Plaintiff's attorney(s) and Plaintiff's designee(s), and such information shall not be disclosed, made public, or made available to anyone, except as specifically provided in this Order or in any further Order that this Court may enter. 6. Any documents, data, or other materials made available by Defendant to Plaintiff's attorney(s) or Plaintiff's designee(s) for inspection in this case shall be deemed Confidential for purposes of the inspection. Any images or copies of Confidential Materials that are provided to Plaintiff shall include the endorsement "CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS--DO NOT DISCLOSE." Plaintiff and Defendant may agree to forego Defendant's review to determine the confidentiality of certain documents, data, and other materials to be provided to Plaintiff, in which case Defendant shall include on those documents, data, and other materials the endorsement "CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS--DO NOT DISCLOSE," before providing the documents, data, and other materials to Plaintiff. All documents, data, and other materials so endorsed shall be deemed Confidential Materials and protected as such under this Order. If Plaintiff intends to file documents, data, or other materials that have been endorsed as Confidential Materials with the Court as evidence or for any other purpose, it shall follow the procedures set forth in this Order. Alternatively, Plaintiff may request that Defendant review certain endorsed documents, data, or other materials to determine if they contain confidential information; redact any confidential information; and produce a version of the documents, data, -3-

Case 1:06-cv-00934-FMA

Document 20-3

Filed 09/28/2007

Page 4 of 9

or other materials, after the necessary redactions, for filing with the Court without the Confidential Materials endorsement. After the documents, data, or other materials have been redacted or otherwise determined not to contain Confidential Materials, the documents, data, or other materials shall no longer be considered confidential and subject to this Order. 7. Documents, data, or other materials relating exclusively to individuals, other Tribes, or entities, or to funds, lands, and resources to which Plaintiff does not claim a legal interest shall not be produced to Plaintiff, unless Plaintiff and Defendant agree that such production would be appropriate and necessary for the purposes of this case. In the event that the parties agree that such documents, data, or other materials should be produced to Plaintiff, Defendant shall include on the documents, data, or other materials the endorsement "CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS--DO NOT DISCLOSE," before providing the documents, data, or other materials to Plaintiff. 8. Plaintiff and Defendant shall share equally the costs of copying or imaging the documents, data, and other materials to be produced to Plaintiff. Copying or imaging charges shall be billed at reasonable rates calculated to cover only the actual costs of copying or imaging, commensurate with the size and difficulty of the requested documents. 9. Any notes, dictation tapes, or media containing electronically stored information that are made as part of a review of the Confidential Materials and that contain information regarding the Confidential Materials shall include the endorsement "CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS--DO NOT DISCLOSE" and shall be subject to the same provisions as copies or images of the Confidential Materials. 6. Acknowledgments and Certifications. Before being provided access to or disclosure of records under this Order, any members of Plaintiffs governing body and designated authorized tribal officials or employees of Plaintiff (collectively, "Plaintiffs tribal officials"), any witnesses, court reporters, or copy or computer service personnel, and any of the parties' experts, consultants, or contractors shall personally review this Order and shall execute and date an acknowledgment as follows: I acknowledge that I have read the Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order which was approved and entered by the United States Court of Federal Claims in Navajo Nation v. United States, No. 06-945L, on May 8, 2007. I understand the Order and agree to comply with its requirements for all record access or disclosure that is provided to me pursuant to the Order. Promptly upon termination of involvement in this action, such persons shall return to the respective attorney of record or destroy any records produced by the other party pursuant to this Order and in such persons' possession or any documents that contain confidential information derived therefrom and shall certify in writing to the respective attorney of record regarding such return or destruction. The attorneys of record shall retain all such acknowledgments and certifications and shall provide copies thereof to opposing counsel upon request. 10. Confidential Materials may be disclosed without further Court approval only to the following: (1) the Court or any settlement judge or mediator appointed, designated, or -4-

Case 1:06-cv-00934-FMA

Document 20-3

Filed 09/28/2007

Page 5 of 9

selected to work with the parties in this case; (2) the attorney(s) of record in this case, as well as the attorney(s), paralegal(s), and support staff in his/her/their office(s) who are involved or may be necessary in the ordinary course to representing parties herein; and (3) Plaintiff's designees in this case. The attorney(s) of record in this case; the attorney(s), paralegal(s), and support staff in the office(s) of the attorney(s) of record; and Plaintiff's designees may have access to the Confidential Materials, provided, however, that, before receiving access to the Confidential Materials, each person receiving such access shall execute an "Affidavit of Confidentiality," in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 1, and provide the Affidavit to Plaintiff's attorney(s) of record. (No Affidavit of Confidentiality needs to be executed by support staffers who simply handle or file the Confidential Materials but do not review their contents.) The executed Affidavits of Confidentiality shall be maintained by Plaintiff's attorney(s) of record. 7. Production Designations and Privilege Log Review. If a responding party provides access to records rather than copies thereof, the requesting party shall designate physical records for production by tagging them and leaving them in the original folders in which they are filed and shall designate electronic records for production by identifying them in writing by record, category, search parameters, or other reasonable methods. Following review of redacted records and corresponding privilege logs provided pursuant to paragraph 3 above, the requesting party shall notify the responding party regarding any such records for which the requesting party disputes the responding party's assertion of privilege or protection. 8. Copying and Labeling. Records designated for production by the requesting party shall within a reasonable period of time be copied or made available for copying at the responding party's option, either in their entirety or in the redacted form in which access to them was provided, at the responding party's expense, subject to RCFC 26(c). Copied records shall be stamped or otherwise labeled CONFIDENTIAL and provided to the requesting party without waiting until all such copies are made, if practical and reasonable under the circumstances. Copies of electronic records, when practicable, shall also include the word CONFIDENTIAL in the file name and in a conspicuous place on the exterior of the CDROM, diskette, or other medium containing the record copies. If the requesting party undertakes copying of designated records, arrangements shall be made to provide the requesting party access to conduct such copying. 9. Production Format. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, the responding party shall produce records in the format in which that party routinely uses or stores them, provided that electronic records shall be produced along with available technical information necessary for access or use thereof by the requesting party. If the requesting party is unable to access or use electronic records in the format used by the responding party, the parties shall try to agree on an electronic format that would be accessible or useable by the requesting party. If the responding party asserts that direct access to electronic records in a database or other electronic collection would be inappropriate, the parties shall attempt in good faith to agree on a protocol that will provide adequate information regarding the organization and structure of such records so that the requesting party can review such records or portions thereof for which the responding party does not assert privilege or protection from disclosure. If the requesting -5-

Case 1:06-cv-00934-FMA

Document 20-3

Filed 09/28/2007

Page 6 of 9

party is unable to access or use or is denied direct access to an electronic record, it may request that the responding party provide a paper version of or underlying source data for the electronic record. 10. Authenticity, Best Evidence, and Form. The parties stipulate that all records produced pursuant to this Order satisfy requirements for authentication under Federal Rule of Evidence 901 and the best evidence rule under Federal Rules of Evidence 1002 to 1005, as applicable, including without limitation for purposes of introduction into evidence or use as exhibits in any deposition or filing, so long as the relevant records have not been altered. If the requesting party agrees in writing to production of any record in a form other than that in which the responding party routinely uses it, the responding party waives any objection as to that form for purposes of its introduction into evidence or its use as an exhibit in any deposition or filing. 11. Confidential Records. Any record produced to a party pursuant to this Order (hereinafter, "confidential records") shall be kept strictly confidential by the receiving party, which may disclose or provide access thereto only pursuant to this Order, further order of the Court, or as otherwise agreed in writing by the parties. Plaintiff shall not use the confidential records, or their contents, for any purpose other than this litigation or related administrative proceedings before the Department of the Interior. 12. Further Disclosure or Access. Unless otherwise authorized under paragraph 11 above, each party may disclose or provide access to confidential records produced by the other party pursuant to this Order only to the following: (a) attorneys of record in this action and attorneys, paralegals, and support staff in their offices in the course of representing the parties herein; (b) Plaintiffs tribal officials, United States government officials as necessary for purposes of this case, as well as witnesses, and experts, consultants, contractors, court reporters, and copy or computer service personnel retained by the parties or the parties' attorneys to assist in this case and persons in their employ, consistent with paragraph 6 above; and (c) the Court and its staff, consistent with paragraph 15 below. 11. Confidential Materials shall be filed under seal by the Clerk of Court in the event that such materials are filed into the court record as evidence or exhibits or for any other purpose. The parties herein shall not file with the Court at any time any pretrial motion, brief, pleading, or other filing in this case, quoting, or paraphrasing Confidential Materials or containing information obtained from Confidential Materials, unless the confidential portion of any such motion, brief, pleading, or other filing is filed under seal with the Clerk of the Court. Materials or pleadings filed under seal shall be filed in accordance with General Order No. 42A of the Court of Federal Claims and other applicable court rules, policies, and Orders. Confidentiality Controls. The parties and all persons who are provided access to or disclosure of confidential records pursuant to this Order shall employ reasonable measures consistent with this Order to control access to, duplication, and disclosure of such records. Whenever any such person is provided access to or disclosure of confidential records by -613.

Case 1:06-cv-00934-FMA

Document 20-3

Filed 09/28/2007

Page 7 of 9

electronic means, such means shall be reasonably secure using available technology (including firewall and server security measures as appropriate), and the confidential nature of such information shall be clearly indicated to anyone accessing such records. 142. Depositions. If confidential records are used as exhibits at a deposition, the parties shall, upon receipt of the transcript of the deposition, designate any pages thereof quoting from or paraphrasing the confidential records, and those pages shall be stamped CONFIDENTIAL and shall themselves be deemed to be confidential records for purposes of this Order. 13. It shall be the responsibility of Plaintiff's attorney(s) of record herein, as well as the attorney(s) working with Plaintiff's attorney(s) of record on this case, and of any other person possessing Confidential Materials, to employ reasonable measures, consistent with this Order to control duplication of, access to, and distribution of the Confidential Materials. 15. Filings and Submissions. The parties shall not file with the Court at any time in this action any motion, brief, pleading, or other filing or submission which attaches, quotes, or paraphrases a confidential record unless the confidential portion of such filing or submission is filed under seal. Filings and submissions under seal, and service thereof, shall be made in a sealed envelope or other appropriately sealed container on which the filing or submitting party shall indicate the caption of this action, the contents of the envelope or container, the phrase "Confidential - Filed or Submitted Under Seal" and the following statement: This envelope or container is sealed and contains confidential information protected by order of the United States Court of Federal Claims. This envelope or container shall not to be opened or have its contents displayed or revealed except by officers of the Court or attorneys for parties to this action, other persons authorized to have such access or disclosure pursuant to the Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order entered in this case, or by further order of the Court or written stipulation of the parties to this action. Absent such further order or stipulation, any person reviewing the contents hereof must return them to the proper custodian in a sealed envelope or container. 16. Dispute Resolution. The parties shall negotiate promptly and in good faith to try to resolve all disputes or objections arising under or concerning any provision of this Order. If the parties cannot mutually resolve such a dispute or objection, including without limitation through the use of redactions, either party may seek a further order of the Court seeking appropriate relief, provided that the parties shall stipulate to expedited briefing, hearing, and review therefor as reasonably requested by either party and as allowed by the Court. 17. Additional Responses. Pursuant to RCFC 26(e), during the pendency of this action, each party shall promptly amend or supplement prior responses to written requests by the other party for access pursuant to this Order if the responding party thereafter acquires, identifies, or locates additional responsive records or if that party learns that the prior responses are in some material respect incomplete or inaccurate and the additional or corrective records have not otherwise been made known to the other party through discovery in this case.

-7-

Case 1:06-cv-00934-FMA

Document 20-3

Filed 09/28/2007

Page 8 of 9

18. Inadvertent Disclosure. The inadvertent or unintended disclosure of privileged documents or records (collectively "records"), regardless of whether the records were designated as privileged at the time of disclosure, shall not be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of a subsequent claim of privilege, either as to the specific records disclosed or as to records related to the same subject matter. The producing party shall inform the receiving party of any inadvertent disclosure of privileged records immediately after discovering such disclosure. At the producing party's request, the receiving party shall either destroy or return the privileged record to the producing party immediately. Thereafter, the producing party shall, within a reasonable amount of time, provide a privilege log to opposing counsel regarding the inadvertently disclosed records. If the parties are unable to agree upon the entitlement of privilege regarding such documents, they shall promptly bring the matter to the attention of the trial judge for resolution by appropriate motion. 14. All Confidential Materials, copies or images thereof, or extracts that constitute Confidential Materials under this Order shall be returned to counsel for Defendant or be destroyed, immediately upon the termination of this litigation (including the resolution of any applicable appeals) or the termination of any related administrative proceedings, if any, before the Interior Department, whichever occurs later. At that time, all individuals who have executed an Affidavit of Confidentiality pursuant to Paragraph 10 of this Order who still have access to such Confidential Materials shall certify in writing that all such Confidential Materials, copies or images thereof, or extracts that constitute Confidential Materials have been returned or destroyed. Plaintiff's attorney(s) of record shall maintain these certifications and shall provide a copy thereof to Defendant's counsel upon request. 19. Final Disposition. Within 270 days after final disposition of this action, including any appeals, Defendant shall return or destroy all confidential records produced by Plaintiff pursuant to this Order. Further, Plaintiff shall identify records produced by Defendant pursuant to this Order that it wishes to retain and shall return or destroy all other records produced by Defendant pursuant to this Order. Within 120 days after Plaintiff identifies the records that it wishes to retain, Defendant shall review those records and propose redactions of confidential information of other Indian tribes, individuals, or entities, except to the extent that such information is subject to 30 U.S.C. § 5 1732. Within 90 days after receiving Defendant's proposed redactions, Plaintiff shall provide any proposed revisions or objections thereto, stating the bases therefor. Plaintiff may retain records identified as above either for which Defendant has not proposed redactions or which have been redacted by agreement of the parties or by order of the Court. Each party shall timely certify to the other party regarding completion of the above actions. Records retained by Plaintiff pursuant to this paragraph shall no longer be subject to this Order. 15. If Plaintiff disputes Defendant's assertion and designation that a document, data, or information is/are subject to confidentiality protection under federal law or regulations, Plaintiff shall notify Defendant in writing and state therein the grounds for disputing Defendant's assertion and designation of confidentiality. Within 30 days of Defendant's receipt of such written notification (or a longer period of time, if the parties so agree), the parties herein shall -8-

Case 1:06-cv-00934-FMA

Document 20-3

Filed 09/28/2007

Page 9 of 9

discuss and attempt to resolve the dispute. If the parties do not resolve the dispute within 30 days or an extension thereof, Plaintiff may file a motion to seek a ruling from the Court regarding Defendant's assertion and designation regarding confidentiality. 20. Discovery Rules. Other than as expressly provided for herein, this Order is not intended and shall not be construed to limit or expand the parties' rights to pursue discovery in this action pursuant to the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims. 16. Until further order of this Court, this Order shall remain in full force and effect after the dismissal of the case and regardless of whether the parties reach settlement. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Francis M. Allegra Francis M. Allegra Judge

-9-