Free Motion to Stay - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:06-cv-00936-TCW

Document 8

Filed 06/27/2007

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS UNITED KEETOWAH BAND OF ) CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)

Case No. 06-cv-00936L Judge Thomas C. Wheeler

PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY STAY OF LITIGATION, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to Rule 6.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"), the parties respectfully make this joint motion for extension of the temporary stay of litigation, to and including December 14, 2007. The grounds for the joint motion are set forth in the following supporting joint status report: 1. Plaintiff filed this case on December 29, 2006. See Complaint, Doc. 1. Additionally,

Plaintiff filed a companion case for declaratory and injunctive relief in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, United Keetowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. Kempthorne, No. 06-cv-00559-RAW (E.D. Okla.), on December 29, 2006. Plaintiff makes

allegations in both cases relating to the trust accounting and trust management responsibilities allegedly owed by Defendant to Plaintiff. 2. Under the Court's order dated February 23, 2007, the litigation of this case is

temporarily stayed until June 27, 2007. 3. Since the filing of this case and the companion case in the U.S. District Court for the

Eastern District of Oklahoma, Plaintiff's counsel, James McMillin, and Defendant's counsel have

Case 1:06-cv-00936-TCW

Document 8

Filed 06/27/2007

Page 2 of 5

discussed and agreed that they would explore the possibility of resolving Plaintiff's issues and claims through settlement discussions or alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes; that they would undertake such activities as informal requests and productions of relevant or potentially relevant documents and data, in furtherance of the settlement discussions; and that they would seek temporary stays of litigation, thus deferring Defendant's obligation to file its Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this case, as well as the parties' obligations to comply with the requirements of RCFC Appendix A, among other things, so as to enable or facilitate the parties' settlement discussions. 4. Also, counsel for the parties have discussed that, by Defendant's calculation, there

are presently about 102 Tribal trust accounting and trust mismanagement lawsuits pending against Defendant in this Court;1/ in the United States District Courts in Oklahoma;2/ and in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.3/ Doc. # 6, Exh. 1. 5. The parties herein believe that it would be in their best interests to work together and

resolve Plaintiff's issues and claims in this case and the U.S. District Court companion case, without the need for protracted litigation, if possible. Accordingly, the parties' counsel have agreed that the parties should seek to stay the litigation of this case and formulate and execute an appropriate, amicable, and mutually satisfactory alternative resolution of Plaintiff's issues and claims.

1/

Given that, upon unopposed motion by the plaintiff, the CFC dismissed, without prejudice, Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States, No. 06cv00939-ECH, on May 22, 2007, there are now 56 cases in the CFC. See Doc. #6, Exhibit (Exh.) 1.
2/

There are currently nine cases in the United States District Courts in Oklahoma. Id.

3/

There are currently 37 cases pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. -2-

Case 1:06-cv-00936-TCW

Document 8

Filed 06/27/2007

Page 3 of 5

6.

To that end, the parties' counsel are preparing to confer and establish an informal

settlement discussion process between Plaintiff, its counsel, and its officials; and Defendant, its counsel, and the appropriate officials and/or staffers from the United States Department of the Interior and the United States Department of the Treasury (i.e., the principally affected federal agencies in this case). 7. The parties have made progress in their efforts to determine the possibility of

resolving Plaintiff's issues and claims, without the need for protracted litigation. At the same time, however, the parties require time to complete their discussions; continue their informal document production process; and establish and implement an informal settlement discussion process. 8. Based on the foregoing, the parties hereby respectfully request that the Court grant

the following relief: a. December 14, 2007; b. Continue the deferral of, among other things, the obligation for Defendant to Extend the temporary stay of litigation in this case, to and including

file its Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint until after the termination of the temporary stay and the obligation of the parties to comply with the requirements of RCFC Appendix A; c. Order that the parties file a joint status report on or before December 14,

2007, informing the Court of the status of their efforts to resolve the issues and claims of this case, and making a proposal--by motion, if appropriate--to the Court about whether and how to proceed with this case. 9. On the one hand, the granting of this joint motion would serve the public interest by

promoting judicial economy and efficiency and conserving the parties' limited resources. Further,

-3-

Case 1:06-cv-00936-TCW

Document 8

Filed 06/27/2007

Page 4 of 5

it would not cause any undue prejudice or harm to the rights and interests of the parties herein. On the other hand, the denial of the joint motion would unduly interfere with the parties' ability to work with each other and devise an efficient, cost-effective, and resource-conserving way for resolving the issues and claims in this case and in Plaintiff's U.S. District Court companion case, without the need for extended litigation. Additionally, it would not support or advance Defendant's ability to address and possibly handle the other Tribal trust case accounting and trust mismanagement cases that have been filed in this Court and in United States District Courts, in a similar, non-litigationoriented manner. WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that their joint motion be GRANTED. Respectfully submitted this 27th day of June, 2007, RONALD J. TENPAS Acting Assistant Attorney General s/ Martin J. LaLonde for s/ James C. McMillin JAMES C. McMILLIN McAfee & Taft, P.C. Two Leadership Square, 10th Floor 211 North Robinson Oklahoma City, OK 73102 Tel: (405) 235-9621 Fax: (405) 235-0439 Attorney of Record for Plaintiff

s/ Martin J. LaLonde MARTIN J. LALONDE United States Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division P.O. Box 663 Washington, D.C. 20044-0663 Tel: (202) 305-0247 Fax: (202) 353-2021 Attorney of Record for Defendant OF COUNSEL: ANTHONY P. HOANG United States Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division P.O. Box 663 Washington, D.C. 20044-0663 Tel: (202) 305-0241 Fax: (202) 353-2021 -4-

Case 1:06-cv-00936-TCW

Document 8

Filed 06/27/2007

Page 5 of 5

THOMAS KEARNS Office of the Solicitor United States Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 RACHEL HOWARD Office of the Chief Counsel Financial Management Service United States Department of the Treasury Washington, D.C. 20227

-5-