Free Joint Preliminary Status Report - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 19.9 kB
Pages: 5
Date: August 20, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 781 Words, 4,923 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/22156/9.pdf

Download Joint Preliminary Status Report - District Court of Federal Claims ( 19.9 kB)


Preview Joint Preliminary Status Report - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:07-cv-00228-MMS

Document 9

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD., Plaintiff, vs. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 07-228 C (Judge Sweeney)

JOINT PRELIMINARY STATUS REPORT Pursuant to Rule 16 and Appendix A of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"), the parties hereby submit this joint preliminary status report. a. Does the Court have jurisdiction over this action?

Plaintiff states that the Court possesses jurisdiction to consider and decide this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491. At this time, defendant is not aware of any reason to challenge the Court's jurisdiction to entertain plaintiff's complaint. b. Should this case be consolidated with any other case?

The parties agree that this case should not be consolidated with any other case. c. Should trial of liability and damages be bifurcated?

The parties agree that the trial of liability and damages should not be bifurcated. d. Should further proceedings be deferred pending consideration of another case before this Court or any other tribunal and the reasons therefore?

The parties agree that further proceedings in this case should not be deferred pending consideration of another case before this Court or any other tribunal. e. Will a remand or suspension be sought?

Neither of the parties will seek remand or suspension. f. Will additional parties be joined?

The parties agree that they will not join any additional parties.

Case 1:07-cv-00228-MMS

Document 9

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 2 of 5

g.

Does either party intend to file a dispositive motion pursuant to Rule 12(b), 12(c), or 56? And, if so, a schedule for the intended filing?

After discovery has been completed, the parties will be in a better position to determine whether the filing of dispositive motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 is appropriate in this case. h. 1. What are the relevant issues? Whether defendant breached its contract with the plaintiff for costs associated

with the construction of rockery walls; 2. i. What damages plaintiff suffered as a result of each alleged breach. What is the likelihood of settlement?

Settlement of this lawsuit does not appear likely at this time. However, the parties will explore settlement options as the parties conduct discovery. j. Do the parties anticipate proceeding to trial?

If dispositive motions are not filed, and the matter cannot be resolved through settlement, trial will be necessary. If dispositive motions are filed, and a trial is necessary to fully decide this case, the United States proposes that the trial be held four to six months after the Court shall have ruled on such motions. The parties expect that a trial would last approximately one week. The parties do not request expedited trial scheduling. The parties request that the trial be conducted in Juneau, Alaska. k. Are there special issues regarding electronic case management needs?

The parties have no special issues regarding electronic case management needs. l. Is there other information of which the Court should be aware at this time?

There is no additional information of which the Court should be aware at this time.

2

Case 1:07-cv-00228-MMS

Document 9

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 3 of 5

m.

What is the proposed discovery plan?

The parties intend to conduct simultaneous discovery through interrogatories, requests for admission, requests for production of documents, and/or depositions. The parties propose the following discovery schedule: Exchange of Initial Disclosures Close of Fact Discovery Expert Reports, if any, exchanged October 1, 2007 April 4, 2008 June 18, 2008

Expert Rebuttal Reports, if any, exchanged July 18, 2008 Deadline for Expert Depositions, if any September 1, 2008

Respectfully submitted,

PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General

JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director

s/ Steven J. Gillingham STEVEN J. GILLINGHAM Assistant Director

3

Case 1:07-cv-00228-MMS

Document 9

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 4 of 5

s/Paul L. Dillon PAUL L. DILLON Dillon & Findley, P.C. 350 N. Franklin Juneau, Alaska 99801 Phone: (907) 586-4000 Fax: (907) 586-7777

s/ David M. Hibey DAVID M. HIBEY Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Attn: Classification Unit, 8th Floor Washington, DC 20530 Tel. (202) 307-0163 Fax (202) 514-8624 Attorneys for Defendant

Attorneys for Plaintiff August 20, 2007

4

Case 1:07-cv-00228-MMS

Document 9

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 5 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on August 20, 2007, a copy of the foregoing "Joint PRELIMINARY STATUS REPORT" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

s/ David M. Hibey David M. Hibey

5