Free Response to Motion - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:07-cv-00255-MMS

Document 17

Filed 10/09/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS SECURITAS GmbH WERKSCHUTZ, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 07-255C No. 07-256C No. 07-257C (Judge Sweeney)

DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD Defendant does not object to plaintiff's motion for substitution of attorney of record in the above captioned cases. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director s/Steven J. Gillingham STEVEN J. GILLINGHAM Assistant Director Of Counsel: STANLEY E. ALDERSON Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice PATRICK L. GARY Major, JA, U.S. Army Litigation Attorney U.S. Army Litigation Division 901 North Stuart Street, Suite 400 Arlington, Virginia 22203 October 9, 2007 s/Armando A. Rodriguez-Feo ARMANDO A. RODRIGUEZ-FEO Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit, 8th Floor 1100 L St., NW Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel: (202) 307-3390 Fax: (202) 514-8624

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 1:07-cv-00255-MMS

Document 17

Filed 10/09/2007

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on this 9th day of October, 2007, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system. /s/ Armando Rodriguez-Feo