Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 1 of 40
A40
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 2 of 40
A41
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 3 of 40
A42
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 4 of 40
A43
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 5 of 40
A44
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 6 of 40
A45
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 7 of 40
A46
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 8 of 40
A47
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 9 of 40
A48
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 10 of 40
A49
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 11 of 40
A50
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 12 of 40
A51
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 13 of 40
A52
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 14 of 40
A53
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 15 of 40
A54
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 16 of 40
A55
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 17 of 40
A56
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 18 of 40
A57
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 19 of 40
A58
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 20 of 40
A59
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 21 of 40
A60
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 22 of 40
A61
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 23 of 40
A62
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 24 of 40
A63
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 25 of 40
A64
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 26 of 40
A65
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 27 of 40
A66
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 28 of 40
A67
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 29 of 40
A68
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 30 of 40
A69
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 31 of 40
A70
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 32 of 40
A71
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 33 of 40
A72
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 34 of 40
A73
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 35 of 40
A74
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 36 of 40
A75
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 37 of 40
A76
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 38 of 40
A77
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 39 of 40
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION HILDA M. GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. FRANCIS J. HARVEY, Secretary of the Army, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, and KENNETH N. WILLIAMSON, US Army Reserve Command, in his official capacity Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:05-CV-355-BBM-JMF
ORDER The Plaintiff, an employee of the United States Army Reserve Command Headquarters at Fort McPherson, has filed a Civil Rights employment discrimination complaint pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §2000e-16) (Title VII), the Equal Pay Act (29 U.S.C. §206(d)(1),1 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) (29 U.S.C. 633a) against Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the Army; the Department of the Army; and Kenneth N. Williamson, Chief Executive office, U.S. Army Reserve Command. [Doc. 1] On June 15, 2004, the defendants filed a Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (2), (3) and (6) Motion to Dismiss contending that the Plaintiff improperly named two defendants in
In the event the Plaintiff seeks more than $10,000.00 in lost wages, she must file her claim in the United States Court of Claims.
1
A78
Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA
Document 7-3
Filed 08/20/2007
Page 40 of 40
their individual and official capacities: the Department of the Army, and Kenneth N. Williamson in his official capacity. The only properly named Defendant in the Title VII and ADEA counts is the Secretary of the Army, Francis J. Harvey. See 42 U.S.C. §2000e16; See Bechtel v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 549 F. Supp. 111, 113 (N.G.Ga. 1982); Honeycutt v. Long, 861 F.2d 1346, 1348-49 (5th Cir. 1988); Welch v. Laney, 57 F.3d 1004, 1010-11 (11th Cir. 1995). The Defendants also assert that the Plaintiff failed to timely assert her claim of a discriminatory denial of promotion, as the action denying her a promotion took place in 1999 but she did not file an administrative complaint until January 2002, more than three years thereafter. See 29 C.F.R. §1614.105 (a)(1); Manning v. Carlin, 786 F.2d 1108 (11th Cir., 1986). Defendants also contend that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over any claim in excess of $10,000.00. This Court is compelled to agree with each of the Defendant's arguments. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that The Department of the Army and Kenneth N. Williamson are hereby DISMISSED as Defendants in both their official and individual capacities. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event the Plaintiff claims more than $10,000.00 in, inter alia, lost wages, this case must be transferred to the United States Court of Claims. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd AUGUST 2005. S/JOEL M. FELDMAN________________ JOEL M. FELDMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A79