Free Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 1 of 40

A40

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 2 of 40

A41

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 3 of 40

A42

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 4 of 40

A43

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 5 of 40

A44

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 6 of 40

A45

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 7 of 40

A46

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 8 of 40

A47

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 9 of 40

A48

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 10 of 40

A49

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 11 of 40

A50

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 12 of 40

A51

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 13 of 40

A52

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 14 of 40

A53

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 15 of 40

A54

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 16 of 40

A55

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 17 of 40

A56

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 18 of 40

A57

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 19 of 40

A58

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 20 of 40

A59

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 21 of 40

A60

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 22 of 40

A61

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 23 of 40

A62

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 24 of 40

A63

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 25 of 40

A64

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 26 of 40

A65

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 27 of 40

A66

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 28 of 40

A67

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 29 of 40

A68

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 30 of 40

A69

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 31 of 40

A70

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 32 of 40

A71

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 33 of 40

A72

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 34 of 40

A73

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 35 of 40

A74

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 36 of 40

A75

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 37 of 40

A76

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 38 of 40

A77

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 39 of 40

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION HILDA M. GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. FRANCIS J. HARVEY, Secretary of the Army, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, and KENNETH N. WILLIAMSON, US Army Reserve Command, in his official capacity Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:05-CV-355-BBM-JMF

ORDER The Plaintiff, an employee of the United States Army Reserve Command Headquarters at Fort McPherson, has filed a Civil Rights employment discrimination complaint pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §2000e-16) (Title VII), the Equal Pay Act (29 U.S.C. §206(d)(1),1 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) (29 U.S.C. 633a) against Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the Army; the Department of the Army; and Kenneth N. Williamson, Chief Executive office, U.S. Army Reserve Command. [Doc. 1] On June 15, 2004, the defendants filed a Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (2), (3) and (6) Motion to Dismiss contending that the Plaintiff improperly named two defendants in

In the event the Plaintiff seeks more than $10,000.00 in lost wages, she must file her claim in the United States Court of Claims.

1

A78

Case 1:07-cv-00318-FMA

Document 7-3

Filed 08/20/2007

Page 40 of 40

their individual and official capacities: the Department of the Army, and Kenneth N. Williamson in his official capacity. The only properly named Defendant in the Title VII and ADEA counts is the Secretary of the Army, Francis J. Harvey. See 42 U.S.C. §2000e16; See Bechtel v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 549 F. Supp. 111, 113 (N.G.Ga. 1982); Honeycutt v. Long, 861 F.2d 1346, 1348-49 (5th Cir. 1988); Welch v. Laney, 57 F.3d 1004, 1010-11 (11th Cir. 1995). The Defendants also assert that the Plaintiff failed to timely assert her claim of a discriminatory denial of promotion, as the action denying her a promotion took place in 1999 but she did not file an administrative complaint until January 2002, more than three years thereafter. See 29 C.F.R. §1614.105 (a)(1); Manning v. Carlin, 786 F.2d 1108 (11th Cir., 1986). Defendants also contend that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over any claim in excess of $10,000.00. This Court is compelled to agree with each of the Defendant's arguments. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that The Department of the Army and Kenneth N. Williamson are hereby DISMISSED as Defendants in both their official and individual capacities. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event the Plaintiff claims more than $10,000.00 in, inter alia, lost wages, this case must be transferred to the United States Court of Claims. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd AUGUST 2005. S/JOEL M. FELDMAN________________ JOEL M. FELDMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A79