Free Answer - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 1 of 32

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS No. 07-704 T (Judge Lawrence M. Baskir) __________ REX G. MAUGHAN and RUTH G. MAUGHAN, husband and wife, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES, Defendant

__________ ANSWER __________

Defendant, the United States of America, in answer to the Complaint of plaintiffs Rex G. Maughan and Ruth G. Maughan, respectfully denies each and every allegation contained therein that is not expressly admitted below. Defendant further responds to each separate paragraph of the Complaint as follows: 1. In response to paragraph 1 of the Complaint, defendant admits

that the action seeks refunds of federal income tax, together with interest 1

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 2 of 32

as provided by law. Defendant denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any of the relief that they seek. 2. In response to paragraph 2 of the Complaint, defendant states

that subject matter jurisdiction, to the extent that it exists, is conveyed by 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1). 3. In response to paragraph 3 of the Complaint, defendant admits

that the Complaint correctly identifies the taxpayer identification numbers that appear on plaintiffs' tax returns for the years in suit. Defendant states that it lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations that plaintiffs are husband and wife and are residents of Paradise Valley, Arizona. 4. Complaint. 5. In response to paragraph 5 of the Complaint, defendant admits Defendant admits the allegations in paragraph 4 of the

that the action seeks refunds of federal income tax "for each of the tax years 1991 through and including 1996." Defendant denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any of the relief that they seek. Defendant states that plaintiffs' assertion that the returns for the years at issue "were timely filed" constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. Defendant

2

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 3 of 32

further states that it lacks information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation that the returns were filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center in Ogden, Utah. COUNT I - 1991 Tax Year 6. In response to paragraph 6 of the Complaint, defendant admits

that plaintiffs filed a federal income tax return, Form 1040, for the 1991 tax year. Defendant avers that the Internal Revenue Service received the tax return on October 20, 1992. Defendant states that it lacks information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation that the tax return was filed "with the Internal Revenue Service Center in Ogden, Utah". Defendant avers that the tax return was processed in the Internal Revenue Service center in Ogden, Utah. 7. Complaint. 8. In response to paragraph 8 of the Complaint, defendant avers Defendant admits the allegations in paragraph 7 of the

that plaintiffs made many separate income tax payments for the 1991 tax year. Defendant avers that plaintiffs' withholding of $3,796,066 was applied to the 1991 tax year effective April 15, 1992. Defendant avers that an estimated tax payment of $639,000 was applied to the 1991 tax year on

3

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 4 of 32

June 19, 1991. Defendant avers that an estimated tax payment of $639,000 was applied to the 1991 tax year on September 18, 1991. Defendant avers that a subsequent payment of $4,200,000 was applied to the 1991 tax year on April 15, 1991. Defendant avers that further payments of $1,199 and $597.37 were applied to the 1991 tax year on April 1, 1997. Defendant avers that further payments of $288,001 and $239,442.07 were applied to the 1991 tax year on August 27, 1999. Defendant avers that $1,747,049 of the above-described sums was applied to the 1992 tax year on April 15, 1992. Defendant states that plaintiffs' assertion that the payments were timely constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. 9. Defendant admits the allegations in the first sentence of

paragraph 9 of the Complaint. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 9 of the Complaint, defendant avers that payments of $288,001 and $239,442.07 were applied to the 1991 tax year on August 27, 1999. 10. In response to first sentence of paragraph 10 of the Complaint,

defendant admits that plaintiffs filed a Form 1040X dated September 27, 2001 for the 1991 tax year with the U.S. Competent Authority and admits that the 1040X was accompanied by a transmittal letter dated November

4

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 5 of 32

28, 1991; defendant further states that Revenue Procedure 96-13 is a document whose content speaks for itself and as to which no response is required. Defendant admits that Exhibit 14 is a true copy of the transmittal letter. In response to the third sentence of paragraph 10 of the Complaint, defendant avers that the claim purports to seek a refund arising from foreign tax credits, but defendant denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any such refund. Defendant further states that plaintiffs' assertion that the claim was timely constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. 11. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 11 of the

Complaint, defendant states that the Form 1040X for the 1991 tax year speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' allegation constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 11 of the Complaint, defendant admits that, but for the page numbers added by plaintiffs and omission of the "Preparer's SSN or PTIN" on page 17, Exhibit 1 is a true copy of the Form 1040X for the 1991 tax year. 12. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 12 of the

Complaint, defendant admits that the Internal Revenue Service sent to

5

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 6 of 32

plaintiffs a Certified Notice of Claim Disallowance dated September 29, 2005; defendant states that the remainder of the first sentence constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 12 of the Complaint, defendant admits that, but for the page numbers added by plaintiffs and the September 30, 2005 stamp on page 112, Exhibit 2 to the Complaint is a true copy of the Certified Notice of Claim Disallowance. 13. In response to paragraph 13 of the Complaint, defendant states

that the 1991 tax return speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required. 14. In response to paragraph 14 of the Complaint, defendant states

that the 1991 refund claim speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required. 15. In response to paragraph 15 of the Complaint, defendant

denies that it is proper to treat Forever Living Products Japan "as a partnership for United States income tax purposes." Defendant further denies that, if Forever Living Products Japan were treated "as a

6

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 7 of 32

partnership for United States income tax purposes," plaintiffs "have overpaid their federal income tax for 1991 in the amount of $1,021,196.00". Defendant specifically denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any refund of income tax for the tax year 1991. COUNT II - 1992 Tax Year 16. In response to paragraph 16 of the Complaint, defendant

admits that plaintiffs filed a federal income tax return, Form 1040, for the 1992 tax year. Defendant avers that the Internal Revenue Service received the tax return on October 18, 1993. Defendant states that it lacks information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation that the tax return was filed "with the Internal Revenue Service Center in Ogden, Utah". Defendant avers that the tax return was processed in the Internal Revenue Service center in Ogden, Utah. 17. Complaint. 18. In response to paragraph 18 of the Complaint, defendant avers Defendant admits the allegations in paragraph 17 of the

that plaintiffs made many separate income tax payments for the 1992 tax year. Defendant avers that plaintiffs' withholding of $9,496,090 was applied to the 1992 tax year effective April 15, 1993. Defendant avers that

7

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 8 of 32

an estimated tax payment of $900,000 was applied to the 1992 tax year on June 17, 1992. Defendant avers that $1,747,049 was applied from the 1991 tax year to the 1992 tax year on April 15, 1992. Defendant avers that a subsequent payment of $2,256,861 was applied to the 1992 tax year on April 15, 1993. Defendant avers that further payments of $3,357 and $1,311.69 were applied to the 1992 tax year on April 1, 1997. Defendant avers that further payments of $459,795 and $321,858.35 were applied to the 1992 tax year on August 27, 1999. Defendant avers that $2,940,441 of the above-described sums was applied to the 1993 tax year on April 15, 1993. Defendant states that plaintiffs' assertion that the payments were timely constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. 19. Defendant admits the allegations in the first sentence of

paragraph 19 of the Complaint. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 19 of the Complaint, defendant avers that payments of $459,795 and $321,858.35 were applied to the 1992 tax year on August 27, 1999. 20. In response to first sentence of paragraph 20 of the Complaint,

defendant admits that plaintiffs filed a Form 1040X dated September 27, 2001 for the 1992 tax year with the U.S. Competent Authority and admits that the 1040X was accompanied by a transmittal letter dated November

8

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 9 of 32

28, 1991; defendant further states that Revenue Procedure 96-13 is a document whose content speaks for itself and as to which no response is required. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 20 of the Complaint, defendant avers that the claim purports to seek a refund arising from foreign tax credits, but defendant denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any such refund. Defendant further states that plaintiffs' assertion that the claim was timely constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. 21. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 21 of the

Complaint, defendant states that the Form 1040X for the 1992 tax year speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' allegation constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 21 of the Complaint, defendant admits that, but for the page numbers added by plaintiffs, omission of the "Preparer's SSN or PTIN" on page 115, and omission of Exhibits B and C, Exhibit 3 is a true copy of the Form 1040X for the 1992 tax year. 22. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 22 of the

Complaint, defendant admits that the Internal Revenue Service sent to plaintiffs a Certified Notice of Claim Disallowance dated September 29,

9

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 10 of 32

2005; defendant states that the remainder of the first sentence constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 22 of the Complaint, defendant admits that, but for the page numbers added by plaintiffs and the September 30, 2005 stamp on page 130, Exhibit 4 to the Complaint is a true copy of the Certified Notice of Claim Disallowance. 23. In response to paragraph 23 of the Complaint, defendant states

that the 1992 tax return speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required. 24. In response to paragraph 24 of the Complaint, defendant states

that the 1992 refund claim speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required. 25. In response to paragraph 25 of the Complaint, defendant

denies that it is proper to treat Forever Living Products Japan "as a partnership for United States income tax purposes." Defendant further denies that, if Forever Living Products Japan were treated "as a partnership for United States income tax purposes," plaintiffs "have

10

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 11 of 32

overpaid their federal income tax for 1992 in the amount of $2,425,699.00". Defendant specifically denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any refund of income tax for the tax year 1992. COUNT III - 1993 Tax Year 26. In response to paragraph 26 of the Complaint, defendant

admits that plaintiffs filed a federal income tax return, Form 1040, for the 1993 tax year. Defendant avers that the Internal Revenue Service received the tax return on October 20, 1994. Defendant states that it lacks information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation that the tax return was filed "with the Internal Revenue Service Center in Ogden, Utah". Defendant avers that the tax return was processed in the Internal Revenue Service center in Philadelphia, PA. 27. Complaint. 28. In response to paragraph 28 of the Complaint, defendant avers Defendant admits the allegations in paragraph 27 of the

that plaintiffs made many separate income tax payments for the 1993 tax year. Defendant avers that plaintiffs' withholding of $1,539,833 was applied to the 1993 tax year effective April 15, 1994. Defendant avers that an estimated tax payment of $2,700,000 was applied to the 1993 tax year

11

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 12 of 32

on June 21, 1993. Defendant avers that an estimated tax payment of $1,600,000 was applied to the 1993 tax year on September 21, 1993. Defendant avers that an estimated tax payment of $1,600,000 was applied to the 1993 tax year on January 21, 1994. Defendant avers that $2,940,441 was applied from the 1992 tax year to the 1993 tax year on April 15, 1993. Defendant avers that a subsequent payment of $2,600,000 was applied to the 1993 tax year on April 15, 1994. Defendant avers that one subsequent payment of $843,998 was made on April 21, 1995, and another subsequent payment of $843,998 was made on April 17, 1996. Defendant avers that $3,885,341 of the above-described sums was applied to the 1994 tax year on April 15, 1994. Defendant states that plaintiffs' assertion that the payments were timely constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. 29. In response to first sentence of paragraph 29 of the Complaint,

defendant admits that plaintiffs filed a Form 1040X dated September 27, 2001 for the 1993 tax year with the U.S. Competent Authority and admits that the 1040X was accompanied by a transmittal letter dated November 28, 1991; defendant further states that Revenue Procedure 96-13 is a document whose content speaks for itself and as to which no response is

12

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 13 of 32

required. In response to the third sentence of paragraph 29 of the Complaint, defendant avers that the claim purports to seek a refund arising from foreign tax credits, but defendant denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any such refund. Defendant further states that plaintiffs' assertion that the claim was timely constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. 30. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 30 of the

Complaint, defendant states that the Form 1040X for the 1993 tax year speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' allegation constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 30 of the Complaint, defendant admits that, but for the page numbers added by plaintiffs, omission of the "Preparer's SSN or PTIN" on page 133, and omission of Exhibits B and C, Exhibit 5 is a true copy of the Form 1040X for the 1993 tax year. 31. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 31 of the

Complaint, defendant admits that the Internal Revenue Service sent to plaintiffs a Certified Notice of Claim Disallowance dated September 29, 2005; defendant states that the remainder of the first sentence constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. In response to the

13

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 14 of 32

second sentence of paragraph 31 of the Complaint, defendant admits that, but for the page numbers added by plaintiffs and the September 30, 2005 stamp on page 148, Exhibit 6 to the Complaint is a true copy of the Certified Notice of Claim Disallowance. 32. In response to paragraph 32 of the Complaint, defendant states

that the document speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required. 33. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 33 of the

Complaint, defendant states that plaintiffs' allegations constitute legal argument to which no response is required. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 33 of the Complaint, defendant states that, but for the page numbers added by plaintiffs and the June 25, 2002 stamp on page 212, Exhibit 13 to the Complaint is a true copy of a letter dated June 13, 2002 from the U.S. Competent Authority to Terrence D. Woolston, Esq. with a case reference of "Aloe Vera of America (97-169 - A, et al.)". 34. Complaint. Defendant denies the allegations in paragraph 34 of the

14

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 15 of 32

35.

In response to paragraph 35 of the Complaint, defendant states

that the 1993 tax return speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required. 36. In response to paragraph 36 of the Complaint, defendant states

that the 1993 refund claim speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required. 37. In response to paragraph 37 of the Complaint, defendant

denies that it is proper to treat Forever Living Products Japan "as a partnership for United States income tax purposes." Defendant further denies that, if Forever Living Products Japan were treated "as a partnership for United States income tax purposes," plaintiffs "have overpaid their federal income tax for 1993 in the amount of $4,711,256.00". Defendant specifically denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any refund of income tax for the tax year 1993. COUNT IV - 1994 Tax Year 38. In response to paragraph 38 of the Complaint, defendant

admits that plaintiffs filed a federal income tax return, Form 1040, for the

15

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 16 of 32

1994 tax year. Defendant avers that the Internal Revenue Service received the tax return on November 7, 1995. Defendant states that it lacks information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation that the tax return was filed "with the Internal Revenue Service Center in Ogden, Utah." Defendant avers that the tax return was processed in the Internal Revenue Service center in Philadelphia, PA. 39. Complaint. 40. In response to paragraph 40 of the Complaint, defendant avers Defendant admits the allegations in paragraph 39 of the

that plaintiffs made many separate income tax payments for the 1994 tax year. Defendant avers that plaintiffs' withholding of $1,283,350 was applied to the 1994 tax year effective April 15, 1995. Defendant avers that an estimated tax payment of $2,975,000 was applied to the 1994 tax year on June 15, 1994. Defendant avers that an estimated tax payment of $2,975,000 was applied to the 1994 tax year on September 22, 1994. Defendant avers that an estimated tax payment of $781,500 was applied to the 1994 tax year on January 15, 1995. Defendant avers that $3,885,341 was applied from the 1993 tax year to the 1994 tax year on April 15, 1994. Defendant avers that a subsequent payment of $16,500,000 was applied to

16

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 17 of 32

the 1994 tax year on April 15, 1995. Defendant avers that $4,968,711 of the above-described sums was applied to the 1995 tax year on April 15, 1995. Defendant states that plaintiffs' assertion that the payments were timely constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. 41. In response to first sentence of paragraph 41 of the Complaint,

defendant admits that plaintiffs filed a Form 1040X dated September 27, 2001 for the 1994 tax year with the U.S. Competent Authority and admits that the 1040X was accompanied by a transmittal letter dated November 28, 1991; defendant further states that Revenue Procedure 96-13 is a document whose content speaks for itself and as to which no response is required. In response to the third sentence of paragraph 41 of the Complaint, defendant avers that the claim purports to seek a refund arising from foreign tax credits, but defendant denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any such refund. Defendant further states that plaintiffs' assertion that the claim was timely constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. 42. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 42 of the

Complaint, defendant states that the Form 1040X for the 1994 tax year speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' allegation constitutes legal

17

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 18 of 32

argument to which no response is required. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 42 of the Complaint, defendant admits that, but for the page numbers added by plaintiffs, omission of the "Preparer's SSN or PTIN" on page 151, and omission of Exhibits B and C, Exhibit 7 is a true copy of the Form 1040X for the 1994 tax year. 43. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 43 of the

Complaint, defendant admits that the Internal Revenue Service sent to plaintiffs a Certified Notice of Claim Disallowance dated September 29, 2005; defendant states that the remainder of the first sentence constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 43 of the Complaint, defendant admits that, but for the page numbers added by plaintiffs and the September 30, 2005 stamp on page 116, Exhibit 8 to the Complaint is a true copy of the Certified Notice of Claim Disallowance. 44. In response to paragraph 44 of the Complaint, defendant states

that the document speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required.

18

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 19 of 32

45.

In response to the first sentence of paragraph 45 of the

Complaint, defendant states that plaintiffs' allegations constitute legal argument to which no response is required. 46. Complaint. 47. In response to paragraph 47 of the Complaint, defendant states Defendant denies the allegations in paragraph 46 of the

that the 1994 tax return speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required. 48. In response to paragraph 48 of the Complaint, defendant states

that the 1994 refund claim speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required. 49. In response to paragraph 49 of the Complaint, defendant

denies that it is proper to treat Forever Living Products Japan "as a partnership for United States income tax purposes." Defendant further denies that, if Forever Living Products Japan were treated "as a partnership for United States income tax purposes," plaintiffs "have overpaid their federal income tax for 1994 in the amount of $9,292,695.00".

19

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 20 of 32

Defendant specifically denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any refund of income tax for the tax year 1994. COUNT V - 1995 Tax Year 50. In response to paragraph 50 of the Complaint, defendant

admits that plaintiffs filed a federal income tax return, Form 1040, for the 1995 tax year. Defendant avers that the Internal Revenue Service received the tax return on October 15, 1996. Defendant states that it lacks information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation that the tax return was filed "with the Internal Revenue Service Center in Ogden, Utah". Defendant avers that the tax return was processed in the Internal Revenue Service center in Ogden, Utah. 51. Complaint. 52. In response to paragraph 52 of the Complaint, defendant avers Defendant admits the allegations in paragraph 51 of the

that plaintiffs made many separate income tax payments for the 1995 tax year. Defendant avers that plaintiffs' withholding of $5,963,640 was applied to the 1995 tax year effective April 15, 1996. Defendant avers that an estimated tax payment of $5,781,000 was applied to the 1995 tax year on June 15, 1995. Defendant avers that an estimated tax payment of

20

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 21 of 32

$5,781,000 was applied to the 1995 tax year on September 15, 1995. Defendant avers that an estimated tax payment of $3,281,000 was applied to the 1995 tax year on January 16, 1996. Defendant avers that $4,968,711 was applied from the 1994 tax year to the 1995 tax year on April 15, 1995. Defendant avers that a subsequent payment of $4,856,002 was applied to the 1995 tax year on April 15, 1996. Defendant avers that $10,771,628 of the above-described sums was applied to the 1996 tax year on April 15, 1996. Defendant states that plaintiffs' assertion that the payments were timely constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. 53. In response to first sentence of paragraph 53 of the Complaint,

defendant admits that plaintiffs filed a Form 1040X dated September 27, 2001 for the 1995 tax year with the U.S. Competent Authority and admits that the 1040X was accompanied by a transmittal letter dated November 28, 1991; defendant further states that Revenue Procedure 96-13 is a document whose content speaks for itself and as to which no response is required. In response to the third sentence of paragraph 53 of the Complaint, defendant avers that the claim purports to seek a refund arising from foreign tax credits, but defendant denies that plaintiffs are entitled to

21

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 22 of 32

any such refund. Defendant further states that plaintiffs' assertion that the claim was timely constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. 54. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 54 of the

Complaint, defendant states that the Form 1040X for the 1995 tax year speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' allegation constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 54 of the Complaint, defendant admits that, but for the page numbers added by plaintiffs, omission of the "Preparer's SSN or PTIN" on page 169, and omission of Exhibits B and C, Exhibit 9 is a true copy of the Form 1040X for the 1995 tax year. 55. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 55 of the

Complaint, defendant admits that the Internal Revenue Service sent to plaintiffs a Certified Notice of Claim Disallowance dated September 29, 2005; defendant states that the remainder of the first sentence constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 55 of the Complaint, defendant admits that, but for the page numbers added by plaintiffs and the September 30, 2005

22

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 23 of 32

stamp on page 185, Exhibit 10 to the Complaint is a true copy of the Certified Notice of Claim Disallowance. 56. In response to paragraph 56 of the Complaint, defendant states

that the document speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required. 57. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 57 of the

Complaint, defendant states that plaintiffs' allegations constitute legal argument to which no response is required. 58. Complaint. 59. In response to paragraph 59 of the Complaint, defendant states Defendant denies the allegations in paragraph 58 of the

that the 1995 tax return speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required. 60. In response to paragraph 60 of the Complaint, defendant states

that the 1995 refund claim speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required.

23

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 24 of 32

61.

In response to paragraph 61 of the Complaint, defendant

denies that it is proper to treat Forever Living Products Japan "as a partnership for United States income tax purposes." Defendant further denies that, if Forever Living Products Japan were treated "as a partnership for United States income tax purposes," plaintiffs "have overpaid their federal income tax for 1995 in the amount of $9,863,011.00". Defendant specifically denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any refund of income tax for the tax year 1995. COUNT VI - 1996 Tax Year 62. In response to paragraph 62 of the Complaint, defendant

admits that plaintiffs filed a federal income tax return, Form 1040, for the 1996 tax year. Defendant avers that the Internal Revenue Service received the tax return on October 24, 1997. Defendant states that it lacks information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation that the tax return was filed "with the Internal Revenue Service Center in Ogden, Utah". Defendant avers that the tax return was processed in the Internal Revenue Service center in Ogden, Utah. 63. Complaint. Defendant admits the allegations in paragraph 63 of the

24

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 25 of 32

64.

In response to paragraph 64 of the Complaint, defendant avers

that plaintiffs made many separate income tax payments for the 1996 tax year. Defendant avers that plaintiffs' withholding of $1,307,939 was applied to the 1996 tax year effective April 15, 1997. Defendant avers that an estimated tax payment of $6,110,500 was applied to the 1996 tax year on June 15, 1996. Defendant avers that an estimated tax payment of $6,110,500 was applied to the 1996 tax year on September 15, 1996. Defendant avers that $10,771,628 was applied from the 1995 tax year to the 1996 tax year on April 15, 1996. Defendant avers that a subsequent payment of $2,000,000 was applied to the 1996 tax year on April 15, 1997. Defendant avers that $7,907,183 of the above-described sums was applied to the 1997 tax year effective April 15, 1997. Defendant states that plaintiffs' assertion that the payments were timely constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. 65. In response to first sentence of paragraph 65 of the Complaint,

defendant admits that plaintiffs filed a Form 1040X dated September 27, 2001 for the 1996 tax year with the U.S. Competent Authority and admits that the 1040X was accompanied by a transmittal letter dated November 28, 1991; defendant further states that Revenue Procedure 96-13 is a

25

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 26 of 32

document whose content speaks for itself and as to which no response is required. In response to the third sentence of paragraph 65 of the Complaint, defendant avers that the claim purports to seek a refund arising from foreign tax credits, but defendant denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any such refund. Defendant further states that plaintiffs' assertion that the claim was timely constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. 66. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 66 of the

Complaint, defendant states that the Form 1040X for the 1996 tax year speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' allegation constitutes legal argument to which no response is required. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 66 of the Complaint, defendant admits that, but for the page numbers added by plaintiffs, omission of the "Preparer's SSN or PTIN" on page 188, and omission of Exhibits B and C, Exhibit 11 is a true copy of the Form 1040X for the 1996 tax year. 67. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 67 of the

Complaint, defendant admits that the Internal Revenue Service sent to plaintiffs a Certified Notice of Claim Disallowance dated September 29, 2005; defendant states that the remainder of the first sentence constitutes

26

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 27 of 32

legal argument to which no response is required. In response to the second sentence of paragraph 67 of the Complaint, defendant admits that, but for the page numbers added by plaintiffs and the September 30, 2005 stamp on page 209, Exhibit 12 to the Complaint is a true copy of the Certified Notice of Claim Disallowance. 68. In response to paragraph 68 of the Complaint, defendant states

that the document speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required. 69. In response to the first sentence of paragraph 69 of the

Complaint, defendant states that plaintiffs' allegations constitute legal argument to which no response is required. 70. Complaint. 71. In response to paragraph 71 of the Complaint, defendant states Defendant denies the allegations in paragraph 70 of the

that the 1996 tax return speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required.

27

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 28 of 32

72.

In response to paragraph 72 of the Complaint, defendant states

that the 1996 refund claim speaks for itself as to its content, and plaintiffs' characterization of the document is legal argument to which no response is required. 73. In response to paragraph 73 of the Complaint, defendant

denies that it is proper to treat Forever Living Products Japan "as a partnership for United States income tax purposes." Defendant further denies that, if Forever Living Products Japan were treated "as a partnership for United States income tax purposes," plaintiffs "have overpaid their federal income tax for 1996 in the amount of $9,424,505.00" Defendant specifically denies that plaintiffs are entitled to any refund of income tax for the tax year 1996. RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS REGARDING ALL COUNTS 74. Complaint. 75. In response to paragraph 75 of the Complaint, defendant Defendant denies the allegations in paragraph 74 of the

admits that no action has been taken on the refund claims by Congress, in any judicial proceeding, or in the Tax Court of the United States. Defendant further admits that the Internal Revenue Service has not taken

28

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 29 of 32

any formal actions on the refund claims beyond the "IRS Notices of Disallowance attached" to the Complaint. 76. In response to paragraph 76 of the Complaint, defendant

admits that in a letter dated September 5, 2007, plaintiffs requested Appeals Office consideration of their refund claims for tax years 1991 through 1996, inclusive. Defendant denies that the Internal Revenue Service declined to follow "standard IRS procedures" with respect to this request. Defendant admits that the Internal Revenue Service declined to extend the statute of limitations. 77. In response to paragraph 77 of the Complaint, defendant states

that it lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations. 78. In response to the prayer for relief, defendant denies that

plaintiffs are entitled to any of the relief that they seek in their Complaint. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 79. Duty of consistency. Plaintiffs represented, in connection with

their tax returns for the years in suit, that Forever Living Products Japan should be classified as a corporation for United States income tax purposes. If, as plaintiffs allege, Forever Living Products Japan should

29

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 30 of 32

instead be classified as a partnership for United States income tax purposes for one or more of the years in suit, the resulting reclassification of Forever Living Products Japan would have various affects that would increase plaintiffs' income tax and/or excise tax liability to the United States. Plaintiffs' tax liability would increase both for some of the years in suit and for other years. To the extent that reclassification of Forever Living Products Japan would increase plaintiffs' various tax liabilities to the United States, the United States may be foreclosed by statutes of limitation from assessing plaintiffs with those additional tax liabilities. The duty of consistency precludes plaintiffs' attempt to reclassify Forever Living Products Japan as a partnership. 80. Equitable Estoppel. Plaintiffs represented, in connection with

their tax returns for the years in suit, that Forever Living Products Japan should be classified as a corporation for United States income tax purposes. If, as plaintiffs allege, Forever Living Products Japan should instead be classified as a partnership for United States income tax purposes for one or more of the years in suit, the resulting reclassification of Forever Living Products Japan would have various affects that would increase plaintiffs' income tax and/or excise tax liability to the United

30

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 31 of 32

States. Plaintiffs' tax liability would increase both for some of the years in suit and for other years. To the extent that reclassification of Forever Living Products Japan would increase plaintiffs' various tax liabilities to the United States, the United States may be foreclosed by statutes of limitation from assessing plaintiffs with those additional tax liabilities. Accordingly, plaintiffs are estopped from asserting in this proceeding that Forever Living Products Japan should be classified as a partnership for United States income tax purposes. 81. Equitable Recoupment/Set-off. Plaintiffs represented, in

connection with their tax returns for the years in suit, that Forever Living Products Japan should be classified as a corporation for United States income tax purposes. If, as plaintiffs allege, Forever Living Products Japan should instead be classified as a partnership for United States income tax purposes for one or more of the years in suit, the resulting reclassification of Forever Living Products Japan would have various affects that would increase plaintiffs' income tax and/or excise tax liability to the United States. Plaintiffs' tax liability would increase both for some of the years in suit and for other years. To the extent that reclassification of Forever Living Products Japan would increase plaintiffs' various tax liabilities to the

31

Case 1:07-cv-00704-LMB

Document 10

Filed 01/29/2008

Page 32 of 32

United States, any tax refund due to plaintiffs must be reduced by the amount of those increased liabilities, notwithstanding any potentially applicable statutes of limitation. WHEREFORE, defendant prays that the Complaint of plaintiffs Rex G. Maughan and Ruth G. Maughan be dismissed with prejudice, with defendant's costs to be taxed against plaintiffs, and with such other relief as the Court deems meet in the premises. Respectfully submitted, s/Jason Bergmann JASON BERGMANN Attorney of Record U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division Court of Federal Claims Section Post Office Box 26 Ben Franklin Post Office Washington, D.C. 20044 (202) 616 3425 NATHAN J. HOCHMAN Assistant Attorney General DAVID GUSTAFSON Chief, Court of Federal Claims Section STEVEN I. FRAHM Assistant Chief s/Steven I. Frahm Of Counsel January 29, 2007 32