Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:08-cv-00063-GWM

Document 6

Filed 05/09/2008

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS THOMAS STINE, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 08-63 C (Judge G. Miller)

DEFENDANT'S SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Pursuant to Rule 6(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"), Defendant, the United States, respectfully requests a 60-day enlargement of time, to and including July 15, 2008, within which to file its response to the complaint. The Government's response is currently due on May 16, 2008, and this is defendant's second request for an enlargement of time for this purpose. In a telephone conversation, Mr. Stine's counsel authorized counsel to state that Mr. Stine does not oppose the Court's granting this request. At this time, the Government has insufficient basis upon which to respond to the allegations in the complaint. Mr. Stine alleges that he was improperly separated from the Navy and is entitled to disability compensation. Upon receipt of the complaint, Government counsel contacted the cognizant Navy counsel and requested the relevant administrative records. The requested records include

Case 1:08-cv-00063-GWM

Document 6

Filed 05/09/2008

Page 2 of 4

Mr. Stine's Board for Correction of Naval Record's ("BCNR") file, his Official Military Personnel File ("OMPF"), his Physical Examination Board ("PEB") file, his Service Medical Records, and his Department of Veteran's Affairs ("VA") medical records. The Navy requested Mr. Stine's VA medical records on March 11, 2008. Navy counsel has confirmed that three volumes of Mr. Stine's medical records are maintained at a VA office in San Diego, California, and that there may be additional medical records maintained by individual VA Medical Centers where Mr. Stine may have received treatment between June 25, 1979, and January 22, 1986, and after his discharge from active duty on January 31, 2002. The VA has tentatively refused to provide the Navy copies of these records in the absence of Mr. Stine's authorization and counsel for Mr. Stine and the Government are working to resolve the requirement for authorization. The additional time requested is necessary to allow sufficient time for Government counsel to assemble and to review the relevant records, to provide plaintiff's counsel copies of the relevant records, and to prepare the Government's response to the complaint. For the foregoing reasons, the Government respectfully requests that the Court grant this unopposed motion for an enlargement of time, to and including July 15, 2008, within which for the Government to file its response to the complaint.

Case 1:08-cv-00063-GWM

Document 6

Filed 05/09/2008

Page 3 of 4

Respectfully submitted, JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ Acting Assistant Attorney General JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director Kirk T. Manhardt Assistant Director OF COUNSEL: LCDR Marc S. Brewen JAGC, USN Office of the Judge Advocate General /s/ John. S. Groat JOHN S. GROAT Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 616-8260 Fax: (202) 514-7965 [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant March 18, 2008

Case 1:08-cv-00063-GWM

Document 6

Filed 05/09/2008

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on the __ day of May, 2008, a copy of the foregoing DEFENDANT'S SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

s/John S. Groat