Free Statement of Facts - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:08-cv-00191-FMA

Document 10

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS CHENEGA TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 08-191C (Judge Allegra)

DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF UNCONTROVERTED FACT Pursuant to Rule 56(h)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"), defendant, the United States, submits the following proposed findings of uncontroverted fact in support of defendant's motion for summary judgment upon plaintiff's complaint. 1. On January 28, 2000, the United States Army, Directorate of Contracting at Fort

Huachuca, Arizona, awarded Contract No. DABT63-00-D-0001 (the "Contract") to McLean Research Corporation, which, in August 2000, became a component of Chenega. Ex. A. 2. The one-year indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity ("ID/IQ") contract, from which task

orders could be issued, specified that, pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation ("FAR") Clause 52.217-8: The Government may require continued performance of any services within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract in accordance with 52.217-8 (Section I). The Contracting Officer may exercise the option by written notice to the contractor prior to the expiration of the contract. Id. at B-1 (emphasis added). The Contract also contained FAR 52.216-18, which incorporated the terms of the Contract to all orders issued against the contract. Id. at I-8. 3. On November 27, 2000, pursuant to FAR 52.217-9, the Army issued modification

Case 1:08-cv-00191-FMA

Document 10

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 2 of 8

P00003 to exercise an option on the Contract, extending it through January 31, 2002. Ex. B (Mods. P00003, P00004). 4. In January 2001, the Army transferred the Contract to the Department of the Interior

("DOI") for administration by National Business Center ("NBC"), DOI's franchise contract management bureau, and the contract number was changed to Contract No. NBCHD010004. Id. (Mods. P00007, P00008). 5. On January 22, 2002, NBC issued Modification No. 0010 to exercise the second option

period extending performance through January 31, 2003. Id. NBC subsequently issued Modification No. 0011, exercising the third and fourth option periods, extending performance through January 31, 2010. Id. 6. In late 2005, the Army issued a statement of work ("SOW") to NBC for technical

assistance services in support of the Army's Office of the Provost General, Operations Division, Corrections and Internment Branch ("OPG"). Ex. C. The work required a broad range of technical support, analysis, training, and policy development for the Army's correctional system. Id. The SOW contemplated one base year, with two one-year option periods. Id. 7. In response to NBC's solicitation for the work, Chenega submitted a time and materials

proposal for a task order against the Contract. On December 8, 2005, NBC contracting officer Dean Haskin issued Task Order No. D0100040052 ("TO 0052") to Chenega for the correctional system work sought by the OPG. Ex. D. 8. TO 0052 had a one-year base period for performance, commencing on December 9, 2005

and expiring December 8, 2006. Ex. D at 3. Modification 001 was issued in March 2006 to add the two one-year option periods contemplated in the SOW. Id. Option Year 1 was identified to 2

Case 1:08-cv-00191-FMA

Document 10

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 3 of 8

begin December 9, 2006 and expire December 8, 2007. Id. 9. On November 20, 2006, the OPG notified NBC of its desire to extend the contract by

exercising TO 0052's first option period ("Option Year 1"). Ex. E. 10. The OPG also issued an updated SOW and designated LTC Alexander Conyers as the

Contracting Officer's Technical Representative ("COTR"). Ex. F. 11. Mr. Haskin advised the OPG that NBC's normal lead time to exercise an option was 60

days, and he could not guarantee the option would be exercised before the expiration of the base year. Ex. G. Mr. Haskin also requested the OPG expedite the delivery of funds to exercise the option. Id. 12. As of December 1, 2006, NBC had not received funding to exercise Option Year 1. Mr.

Haskin notified the OPG that, due to the limited time remaining in the base performance period, NBC would not be able to complete the actions necessary "to ensure there is no lapse in service." Ex. H. 13. On December 5, 2006, Chenega's senior contract administrator, Paula Isicson, contacted

Mr. Haskin to request "the status of the government issuing a modification to exercise the option to extend the Period of Performance so we can advise our employees as to whether they should report to work after December 8th." Ex. I. 14. After a telephone conversation with Mr. Haskin, Ms. Isicson stated in an e-mail that it

was his understanding that because NBC had received funding, "Chenega can continue to work on this task until the modification is issued." Ex. J. 15. Mr. Haskin replied that Chenega's election to continue work beyond the base period of

performance, but prior to the written exercise of the option, "should not be a problem," but that 3

Case 1:08-cv-00191-FMA

Document 10

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 4 of 8

because NBC did not receive the funding until five days before the performance end date, he "could not guarantee the action would be completed in time." Ex. K. 16. Brenda Campbell, the NBC Contracting Officer, however, clarified that, until a

modification was issued, Chenega would be working at its own risk: Please be advised that anytime a contractor works without the benefit of a signed contract they are working at risk. The Government will not ask or condone a contractor to work at risk. We can exercise an option late as long as there was demonstrated intent to do so. If and when a modification is issued to exercise the option Chenega will be allowed to invoice for services as if there were no break. Ex. L. 17. On December 8, 2006, NBC issued Chenega a notice of "Intent to Exercise the Option to

Extend the Term of the Contract," which provided, in part: This letter advises you of our intent to extend the contract and does not in any way commit or obligate the Government. Should the Government extend the term of the contract, a modification will be issued. By acknowledging receipt and acceptance of this notification, the contractor agrees to waive the 60-day notification in FAR 52.217-9. Please return this letter, executed . . . if you concur with this. Ex. M. 18. Despite Ms. Campbell's warning, after the period of performance for TO 0052 expired on

December 8, 2006, Chenega continued working. Mr. Haskin, and his contract specialist Eileen Carter, continued the administrative review necessary to issue the modification to exercise Option Period 1, but soon discovered that the COTR, LTC Conyers, lacked required COTR training. Ex. N.

4

Case 1:08-cv-00191-FMA

Document 10

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 5 of 8

19.

On January 9, 2007, Ms. Isicson contacted NBC about the status of the yet-to-be-issued

modification. Ex. O. 20. Ms. Carter notified Ms. Isicson of the COTR's training deficiency and advised that the

contract modification to exercise Option Year 1 could not be issued until the COTR completed training. Ex. P. 21. 22. In mid-March, the OPG suggested a new COTR, Gerald Patterson. Ex. Q. In June, 2007, NBC became aware that the Small Business Administration required

Chenega to re-certify its 8(a) status, and Campbell instructed her staff that no new awards could be made, or options on existing contracts exercised, until Chenega's 8(a) status was resolved. Ex. R. 23. On June 22, 2007, Mr. Haskin advised Chenega that NBC would not exercise the option

period due to the delay period since the expiration of TO 0052. Ex. S. Mr. Haskin also informed Chenega that because Chenega worked beyond the period of performance of the base year "at [its] own risk," NBC would not authorize payment for services rendered after base period expired. Id. 24. On July 2, 2007, Chenega requested that NBC reverse its decision to not exercise the

option period. Ex. T. 25. On August 6, 2007, Campbell advised Chenega that its request for reconsideration was

denied. Ex. U. 26. On November 28, 2007, Chenega submitted a certified claim to Mr. Haskin seeking

$169,956.17 for services rendered after the base period of performance ended on December 8, 2006. Ex. V. 27. On January 11, 2008, Mr. Haskin issued the Contracting Officer's Final Decision denying 5

Case 1:08-cv-00191-FMA

Document 10

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 6 of 8

Chenega's claim because Chenega worked without a contract in place at its own risk. Ex. W. 28. On March 19, 2008, Chenega commenced the instant litigation.

Respectfully submitted,

GREGORY G. KATSAS Assistant Attorney General

JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director

s/Reginald Blades REGINALD BLADES Assistant Director

s/Sean M. Dunn SEAN DUNN Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 1100 L Street, N.W., 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 616-0883 Fax: (202) 353-7988

Attorneys for Defendant July 18, 2008 6

Case 1:08-cv-00191-FMA

Document 10

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 7 of 8

7

Case 1:08-cv-00191-FMA

Document 10

Filed 07/18/2008

Page 8 of 8

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on this 18th day of July 2008, a copy of the foregoing "Defendant's Proposed Findings Of Uncontroverted Fact," was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

s/Sean M. Dunn