Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:03-cv-00289-FMA

Document 90

Filed 06/13/2006

Page 1 of 2

In The United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 03-289C (Filed: June 13, 2006) __________ UNITED MEDICAL SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. __________ ORDER ___________ On June 9, 2006, plaintiff filed an unopposed motion to extend the deadlines in the court's April 26, 2006, order by approximately two weeks. The motion is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly: (i) On or before July 5, 2006, defendant shall produce any remaining data concerning sales transactions pertinent to this case, and respond to plaintiff's interrogatories 4, 5, 6, 7, 19, 20, and plaintiff's supplemental interrogatory; On or before July 5, 2006, defendant shall also file affidavits for each medical treatment facility or other federal facility eligible to place orders under the contract, responding at a minimum to the following questions: 1) When the facility or its employees became aware of a potential or actual claim by plaintiff and how that notification occurred; What steps the facility or its employees took in response to becoming aware in terms of the preservation of potentially relevant evidence; When the facility or its employees were formally notified by the Department of Defense, an agency thereof, or the Department of Justice as to the pendency of the instant suit and how that notification occurred;

(ii)

2)

3)

Case 1:03-cv-00289-FMA

Document 90

Filed 06/13/2006

Page 2 of 2

4)

What steps the facility or its employees took in response to this notification in terms of the preservation of potentially relevant evidence; The dates and details of subsequent communications from the Department of Defense, an agency thereof, or the Department of Justice concerning the identification, preservation or production of records constituting potentially relevant evidence in this case; The nature and extent of any records that the facility originally had that are potentially relevant to this case; The nature and extent of any records that the facility currently has that are potentially relevant to this case; A detailed description of any records that are potentially relevant to this case that are known to have been destroyed, and a detailed description of how that destruction occurred; A detailed description of the facility's standard record retention/destruction policy, including how the policy applies when the facility becomes aware of a potential claim or filed lawsuit;

5)

6)

7)

8)

9)

(iii)

On or before August 4, 2006, plaintiff shall depose Mr. William Bandy, applying the rules of evidence as though the witness was testifying at trial, with defendant making any objections it feels are appropriate; On or before August 4, 2006, plaintiff shall respond to defendant's interrogatory 9; and On or before August 18, 2006, the parties shall file a joint status report indicating how this case should proceed.

(iv)

(v)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Francis M. Allegra Francis M. Allegra Judge

-2-