Free Witness List - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 82.4 kB
Pages: 16
Date: January 24, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 2,666 Words, 17,784 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/592/268.pdf

Download Witness List - District Court of Federal Claims ( 82.4 kB)


Preview Witness List - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 00-697C (Senior Judge Merow)

DEFENDANT'S APPENDIX A, PARAGRAPH 15(a) WITNESS LIST Pursuant to the Court's pretrial scheduling orders and paragraph 15(a) of Appendix A to the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims, defendant, the United States, provides the following list of trial witnesses. This list does not contain witnesses that the defendant may choose to use for impeachment. Defendant reserves the right to: (1) identify additional witnesses for authentication of documents based upon the objections ultimately asserted by plaintiff, Wisconsin Electric Power Company ("WEPCO"), in response to the exhibit lists served in this case; (2) amend this list as described in the Court's rules or based upon the Court's rulings upon any motions in limine filed by WEPCO; (3) call all witnesses listed on the witness list provided by WEPCO; and (4) supplement this list with the names of the witnesses that it designates to be presented by trial or deposition transcript in accordance with the Court's pretrial orders.

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 2 of 16

FACT WITNESSES THAT DEFENDANT EXPECTS TO PRESENT Government Employees or Contractors (Present and Former) 1. Christopher Kouts Director, Office of Systems Analysis and Strategy Development Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 Mr. Kouts is expected to testify concerning the Department of Energy's ("DOE") plans to accept spent nuclear fuel at a geological repository and a Monitored Retrievable Storage ("MRS") facility, the reasons for the delays in the Yucca Mountain project, and DOE's ability to accept utility spent nuclear fuel, budgetary issues, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 2. Ronald Milner 15102 Carlbern Drive Centreville, VA 20120 Mr. Milner, former Chief Operating Officer for DOE's Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management ("OCRWM"), is expected to testify concerning the implementation of the Standard Contract, including acceptance rates, the Annual Capacity Report ("ACR") issue resolution process conducted with industry representatives, the issuance and content of the ACRs, the issuance and content of the Acceptance Priority Ranking ("APR"), delivery commitment schedules, schedule negotiations, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 1 hour 1-2 hours

2

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 3 of 16

3.

Robert L. Morgan P. O. Box 2584 Monument, Colorado 80132 Mr. Morgan, former Director of DOE's Nuclear Waste Policy Act ("NWPA") Project

Office, is expected to testify concerning the early implementation of the NWPA, the formation of the Standard Contract, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 4. 1-2 hours

Thomas Pollog Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 Mr. Pollog is expected to testify concerning the implementation of the Standard Contract,

including acceptance rates, the ACR issue resolution process conducted with industry representatives, the issuance and content of the ACRs, the issuance and content of the APR, delivery commitment schedules, schedule negotiations, and other relevant matters. Mr. Pollog is also expected to testify concerning the DOE database built upon the Form RW-859 data submitted by the utilities and used to develop fuel acceptance allocations. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 5. 1 hour

Alan Brownstein Chief Operating Officer Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management United States Department of Energy RW-1 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 Mr. Brownstein will provide testimony concerning the Government's implementation of

the Standard Contract, including acceptance rates, the ACR issue resolution process conducted 3

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 4 of 16

with industry representatives, the issuance and content of the ACRs, the issuance and content of the APRs, delivery commitment schedules, schedule negotiations, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 6. Billy Cole 4370 Oak Bay Road Port Ludlow WA 98365 Mr. Cole, based upon his position as a contractor for DOE, will testify about the Government's implementation of the Standard Contract, including the ACR issue resolution process conducted with industry representatives, the issuance and content of the ACRs, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 7. 1 hour 1 hour

David Zabransky Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 As a former employee of WEPCO, Mr. Zabransky is expected to testify regarding

WEPCO's spent fuel storage needs and consideration of spent fuel storage alternatives prior to the construction of its dry spent fuel storage facility, WEPCO's participation in the ACR issue resolution process, WEPCO's expectations with respect to DOE performance, and other relevant matters. Mr. Zabransky is also expected to testify concerning his knowledge of issues concerning the Standard Contract based upon his experience in the nuclear utility industry prior to his employment with DOE. As a DOE employee, Mr. Zabransky is expected to testify concerning the Government's implementation of the Standard Contract, including acceptance rates, the ACR issue resolution 4

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 5 of 16

process conducted with industry representatives, the issuance and content of the ACRs, the issuance and content of the APRs, delivery commitment schedules, schedule negotiations, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 8. 4 hours

Tammy Croote United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 Ms. Croote is expected to testify regarding the annual fee amounts charged to operating

power reactors, the calculation of those fees, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 9. 1 hour

Peter Rabideau United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738 Mr. Rabideau is expected to testify regarding the rulemaking that changed the annual fee

amounts charged to operating power reactors for the fiscal years 1999 to the present, the budgeted resource allocations relating to the various fee classes, the planned activities relating to those budgeted resource allocations, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 1-2 hours

5

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 6 of 16

Plaintiff's Employees (Present and Former) 10. Glenn Adams Florida Power& Light 700 Universe Blvd. Juno Beach, FL 33408-2657 Mr. Adams is expected to testify regarding WEPCO's activities relating to the TN-32 cask project, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 11. Kevin Anundson S. 85 W. 19762 Greenhaven Court Muskego, WI 53150 Mr. Anundson is expected to testify regarding WEPCO's spent fuel storage needs prior to the construction of its dry spent fuel storage facility, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 12. 1 hour 1 hour

Michael Baumann Nuclear Management Company, LLC Mr. Baumann is expected to testify regarding the fuel management strategies that

WEPCO would have used to increase the amount of space available for storage in the spent fuel pool if DOE had begun acceptance in 1998, including change of fuel cycle length, fuel enrichment, or core design, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 1-2 hours

6

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 7 of 16

13.

Jim Becka Nuclear Management Company, LLC Mr. Becka is expected to testify regarding the costs associated with loading spent fuel

casks, the use of the VSC-24 cask system, the selection and use of the NUHOMS cask system, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 14. Peter Bronk 10990 Cannonade Drive Parker, CO 80138 Mr. Bronk is expected to testify about the contents of the spent fuel pool, options for storage of material contained in the spent fuel pool, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 15. Marlin Conry W. 334 S. 9383 Red Brae Drive Mukwonago, WI 53149 Mr. Conry is expected to testify regarding the degradation of the Unit 2 steam generators, the fuel storage space needed for steam generator replacement, the timing issues associated with steam generator replacement, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 16. Richard Grigg 4140 Far-O-Way Lane Richfield, OH 44286 Mr. Grigg is expected to testify regarding WEPCO's completion of its final delivery schedules, the TN-32 cask project, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 1 hour 1 hour 1 hour 1-2 hours

7

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 8 of 16

17.

William Hennessy Nuclear Management Company, LLC Mr. Hennessy is expected to testify regarding issues relating to the Point Beach spent fuel

pool, including the impact on WEPCO of any modifications to the pool, full core reserve, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 18. 1-2 hours

Michael Holzmann Nuclear Management Company, LLC Mr. Holzmann is expected to testify regarding the VSC-24 cask system, loading activities

and costs, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 19. Gary Krieser We Power Mr. Krieser is expected to testify regarding WEPCO's projections of storage needs during the time of its ISFSI application to the PSCW, the amount of WEPCO's damage claim, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 20. Robert Link 7703 Bonilla Drive Pasco, WA 99301 Mr. Link is expected to testify regarding the timetable for PFS availability, the spent fuel storage alternatives considered by WEPCO, WEPCO's completion of its delivery commitment schedules, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 2 hours 1-2 hours 1 hour

8

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 9 of 16

21.

Roger Newton 3623 Nagawicka Shores Drive Hartland, WI 53029 Mr. Newton is expected to testify about WEPCO's spent fuel storage needs subsequent to

its second re-racking, the Newton project, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 22. Steven Parker 1331 Wood Creek Drive Oconomowoc, WI 53066 Mr. Parker is expected to testify regarding the process used by WEPCO for obtaining PSCW approval for capital projects, the WEPCO dry storage project, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 23. Dave Porter 6530 N. Pine Shore Drive Milwaukee, WI 53209 Mr. Porter is expected to testify regarding the process used by WEPCO for obtaining PSCW approval for capital projects, the WEPCO dry storage project, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 24. Howard Shimon 3132 West Joliet Court Mequon, WI 53092 Mr. Shimon is expected to testify regarding contract formation issues, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 1-2 hours 1-2 hours 1 hour 1 hour

9

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 10 of 16

25.

Ione Straub 9480 N. Broadmoor Road Bayside, WI 53217 Ms. Straub is expected to testify about WEPCO's preparation of its damages claim, and

other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 26. 1-2 hours

David Weaver Wisconsin Electric Power Company Mr. Weaver is expected to testify regarding the decision to use the NUHOMS cask

system, the TN-32 cask project, decommissioning cost estimates, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 1 hour

Third Party Witnesses 27. Loring E. Mills 132 Eareckson Lane Stevensville, MD 21666 Mr. Mills, formerly with the Edison Electric Institute, a utility trade association, from 1976 to 1993, may testify concerning the development of the Standard Contract, the utilities' alleged understanding regarding the rate and schedule of spent nuclear fuel acceptance by DOE, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 1 hour

10

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 11 of 16

28.

Jon Kapitz Xcel Energy 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401 Mr. Kapitz is expected to testify regarding whether NSP would purchase WEPCO's TN-

32 casks, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 30 minutes

GOVERNMENT'S EXPERT WITNESSES 29. Warren Brewer ABZ, Inc. 4451 Brookfield Corporate Drive Suite 107 Chantilly, VA 20151 Mr. Brewer is expected to testify concerning technical issues and matters relevant to plaintiff's damages claim, as well as activities that would have occurred at Point Beach regardless of DOE's partial breach of the Standard Contract. Mr. Brewer's opinions and the bases for those opinions are set out in his expert witness report. The information specified in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("FRCP") 26(a)(2)(B) is attached to Mr. Brewer's expert witness report. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 30. Stephen Kiraly Navigant Consulting, Inc. Suite 500 1801 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Mr. Kiraly is expected to testify concerning the calculation of plaintiff's claimed damages, adjustments to plaintiff's damages because certain claimed costs were non-incremental 2 hours

11

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 12 of 16

to the partial breach, and the monetization of expert opinions offered by Mr. Brewer and Mr. Hamal. Mr. Kiraly's opinions and the bases for those opinions are set out in his expert witness report. The information specified in FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is attached to Mr. Kiraly's expert witness report. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 31. Cliff W. Hamal LECG, LLC Suite 800 1725 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Mr. Hamal is expected to testify concerning an economic analysis of plaintiff's damages claim, as well as activities that would have occurred at Point Beach regardless of DOE's partial breach of the Standard Contract. Mr. Hamal's opinions and the bases for those opinions are set out in his expert witness report. The information specified in FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is attached to Mr. Hamal's expert witness report. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 2 hours 3 hours

12

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 13 of 16

FACT WITNESSES THAT DEFENDANT WILL CALL FOR AUTHENTICATION Plaintiff's Employees (Present and Former) 32. Carlyle Fay 1685 Horns Corners Road Cedarburg, WI 53012 Mr. Fay, a retired WEPCO employee, will be called to authenticate WEPCO documents that the Government has placed upon its exhibit list. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 33. Thomas L. Hayslett 910 Red Fox Lane Hixson, Tennessee 37343 Mr. Hayslett, a retired employee of Tennessee Valley Authority ("TVA"), will be called to authenticate TVA documents that the Government has placed upon its exhibit list. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 15 minutes 34. John Buchheit Senior Engineer, Nuclear Fuels Duke Engineering and Services 400 Donald Lynch Boulevard Marlboro, MA 01752 Mr. Buchheit, a former employee of Yankee Atomic Electric Company ("Yankee Atomic"), will be called to authenticate Yankee Atomic documents that the Government has placed upon its exhibit list. Estimate Time For Direct: 15 minutes 15 minutes

13

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 14 of 16

FACT WITNESSES THAT DEFENDANT MAY CALL IF THE NEED ARISES Plaintiff's Employees (Present and Former) 35. David Ackerman Wisconsin Electric Power Company Mr. Ackerman is expected to testify regarding WEPCO's claim for recovery of prejudgment interest, financing of claimed costs, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 36. 1 hour

James Schubilske Wisconsin Electric Power Company Mr. Schubilske is expected to testify regarding WEPCO's claim for recovery of

prejudgment interest, financing of claimed costs, and other relevant matters. Estimated Time For Direct Examination: 1 hour

14

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 15 of 16

Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director OF COUNSEL: JANE K. TAYLOR Office of the General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20585 s/ Harold D. Lester, Jr. HAROLD D. LESTER, JR. Assistant Director

MARIAN E. SULLIVAN RUSSELL A. SHULTIS SONIA M. ORFIELD Trial Attorneys Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice

s/ Kevin B. Crawford KEVIN B. CRAWFORD Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 305-9640 Fax: (202) 307-2503 Attorneys for Defendant

January 24, 2007

15

Case 1:00-cv-00697-JFM

Document 268

Filed 01/24/2007

Page 16 of 16

CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND SERVICE I hereby certify that on January 24, 2007, a copy of foregoing "DEFENDANT'S APPENDIX A, PARAGRAPH 15(a) WITNESS LIST" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

s/ Kevin B. Crawford