Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 27.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: July 20, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 356 Words, 2,315 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/6524/192.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims ( 27.9 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:91-cv-01362-CFL

Document 192

Filed 07/20/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS THE BOEING COMPANY, SUCCESSOR- ) IN-INTEREST TO ROCKWELL ) INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. )

No. 91-1362 C (Judge Lettow)

DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pursuant to Rule 6.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), defendant respectfully submits this unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment And Memorandum In Support Thereof, served May 25, 2006. Defendant requests an extension of 6 days, to and including July 27, 2006, to file its response. Plaintiff does not oppose this request. This is defendant's third request for an enlargement regarding this motion. As grounds for defendant's request for an extension, defendant states as follows: 1. Plaintiff served its motion on May 25, 2006. By prior unopposed motions,

defendant requested enlargements through July 21, 2006. 2. The undersigned counsel of record completed a draft of the response by July 17,

2006, and submitted it for review within the Department of Justice. That review process is currently ongoing. Accordingly, defendant seeks this extension of 6 days to allow for completion of the review process, any necessary revision, and compilation of the final version of its 1

Case 1:91-cv-01362-CFL

Document 192

Filed 07/20/2006

Page 2 of 2

response. 6. On July 19, 2006, the undersigned was advised by Richard J. Ney, Esq., lead

counsel for Plaintiff, that Plaintiff does not object to the requested enlargement of 6 days. WHEREFORE, defendant respectfully requests that the Court extend the time for defendant to file its response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment by 6 days, to and including July 27, 2006. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director DONALD E. KINNER Assistant Director s/ John A. Kolar JOHN A. KOLAR DONALD WILLIAMSON Trial Attorneys Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice P.O. Box 261 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Tele: (202) 305-9301 Attorneys for Defendant

Dated: July 20, 2006