Case 3:01-cv-01913-DJS
Document 43
Filed 07/02/2004
Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT -------------------------------------------------------- : HOWARD JOHN GOMBERT, JR. : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : LARRY LYNCH and : WILLIAM KAMINSKI : : Defendants. : _____________________________________ : CASE NO. 3:01-1913(DJS)
JUNE 30, 2004
DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSES The Defendants Larry Lynch and William Kaminski (the "Defendants") by and through their attorneys, Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C., answer the Plaintiff's Complaint as follows: A. PARTIES: 1. The Defendants have insufficient knowledge or information upon which to form a
belief and therefore leave the Plaintiff to his proof. 2. The Defendants admit only that Larry Lynch is a member of the New Milford Police
Department. The Defendants do not have sufficient knowledge or information upon which to form a belief regarding the remainder of Paragraph Number 2 and therefore leave the Plaintiff to his proof. 3. The Defendants admit only that William Kaminski is a member of the New Milford
Police Department. The Defendants do not have sufficient knowledge or information upon which to
367394
Case 3:01-cv-01913-DJS
Document 43
Filed 07/02/2004
Page 2 of 4
form a belief regarding the remainder of Paragraph Number 3 and therefore leave the Plaintiff to his proof. B. 1-2. JURISDICTION: As the allegations contained in Paragraphs B. 1-2 contain the Plaintiff's statement of
jurisdiction, no response is required or made. C. NATURE OF THE CASE: As to the allegations contained in Section C., entitled "Nature of the Case", the Defendants admit only that the plaintiff was lawfully arrested. The Defendants do not have sufficient knowledge or information upon which to form a belief regarding the remainder of the allegations in this section of the Complaint and therefore leave the Plaintiff to his proof. D. CAUSE OF ACTION: As to the allegations contained in Section D., entitled "Cause of Action", the Defendants admit only that the plaintiff was lawfully arrested and that, in connection with his arrest and a subsequent investigation, certain evidence was lawfully seized. The Defendants deny that the plaintiff's rights were violated. The Defendants do not have sufficient knowledge or information upon which to form a belief regarding the remainder of the allegations in this section of the Complaint and therefore leave the Plaintiff to his proof. E. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS AND ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF: Not applicable. F. PREVIOUSLY DISMISSED ACTIONS OR APPEALS: Not applicable.
367394
2
Case 3:01-cv-01913-DJS
Document 43
Filed 07/02/2004
Page 3 of 4
G. 1-3.
REQUEST FOR RELIEF: The Defendants deny the plaintiff's request for relief. BY WAY OF AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The Plaintiff has failed to state claims upon which relief may be granted. SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The actions and conduct of the Defendants, to the extent that they occurred as alleged, were objectively reasonable under the circumstances of which they were aware, and they enjoy qualified immunity from all liability therefor. THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The actions and conduct of the Defendants did not violate any clearly established constitutional or federal statutory right of which they reasonably should have been aware, and they are entitled to qualified immunity. Respectfully submitted, DEFENDANTS LARRY LYNCH and WILLIAM KAMINSKI By:______________________________ JAMES N. TALLBERG, ESQ. Federal Bar Number ct17849 Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. One State Street Hartford, CT 06123-1277 Tel. (860) 548-2600
367394
3
Case 3:01-cv-01913-DJS
Document 43
Filed 07/02/2004
Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE THIS IS TO CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, this ___ day of June, 2004 to the following pro se party and counsel of record: Howard John Gombert, Jr. 1153 East Street South Suffield, CT 06080 INMATE NO. 108050 By:______________________________ JAMES N. TALLBERG, ESQ. Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. ยท
367394
4