Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 21.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: September 10, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 382 Words, 2,347 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/15273/73.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 21.2 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:01-cv-01918-SRU

Document 73

Filed 09/13/2004

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SANDRA SONDERLAND PLAINTIFF VS. JANICE MERRIGAN, ET AL. DEFENDANTS : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION

CASE NO. 3:01CV1918 (SRU)

SEPTEMBER 10, 2004

DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THEIR REPLY BRIEF The defendants, Janice Merrigan, James Mroczka and the City of Meriden hereby respectfully move for an additional 10 days from September 10, 2004, until September 20, 2004 to file their reply brief to the plaintiff's objection to the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. In accordance with L.Civ.R. 9(b), and in support of this motion, the defendants represent as follows: 1. The plaintiff's Objection for Summary Judgment, dated August 26, 2004 was received in this office on August 31, 2004. 2. The plaintiff's brief, statement of the facts and supporting documents are voluminous and have raised numerous complex issues that require further in depth research to adequately reply to the plaintiff's objection to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. 3. The undersigned left a message at the office of the plaintiff's counsel with notice of this request. Past requests for extensions of time from either party in this matter have never been objected to.

1

Case 3:01-cv-01918-SRU

Document 73

Filed 09/13/2004

Page 2 of 3

4.

This is the first such motion for extension of time with respect to the Defendants' Reply to the Plaintiff's Objection to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

WHEREFORE, the defendants respectfully request that this Motion for Extension of Time to file their Reply to the Plaintiff's Objection to the Motion for Summary Judgment be granted until September 20, 2004.

THE DEFENDANTS JANICE MERRIGAN JAMES MROCZKA CITY OF MERIDEN

By:______ /s/____________________ Deborah L. Moore Their Attorney City of Meriden Legal Department City Hall 142 East Main Street Meriden, CT 06450 (203)630-4045 (203)630-7907 [email protected] Juris No. ct17792

2

Case 3:01-cv-01918-SRU

Document 73

Filed 09/13/2004

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATION This is to certify that on the 10th day of September, 2004, a copy of the foregoing was mailed, postage prepaid, to the following: BRUCE CHAPLIN, ESQ., 208 Main Street, Durham, CT 06422.

______ /s/____________________ Deborah L. Moore

3