Free Response - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 29.5 kB
Pages: 5
Date: November 30, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,208 Words, 7,171 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/15314/26.pdf

Download Response - District Court of Connecticut ( 29.5 kB)


Preview Response - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:01-cv-01959-SRU

Document 26

Filed 12/01/2004

Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

WEBSTER BANK, Plaintiff v. DEBBIE M. KERPEN, A/K/A DEBBIE C. KERPEN A/K/A DEBBIE KERPEN A/K/A DEBORAH KERPEN, BANKBOSTON, N.A. N/K/A FLEET BANK, ROBERT KERPEN, HATMAN CONSTRUCTION, LLC, AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.

: : : : : Civil No. 3:01CV01959(SRU) : : : : : : : : : November 30, 2004

DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER RE: STATUS AND REQUEST TO CLOSE CASE Defendant the United States of America (the "United States") hereby responds to the Court's November 22, 2004, "Order re: Status" by stating that all appropriate relief in the above case has been granted, that each party has either acknowledged receiving appropriate relief or has withdrawn its claim, and that the time has come to close the case. As grounds for this statement and request, the United States says: 1. Plaintiff Webster Bank initiated the above civil foreclosure action to collect its mortgage on certain real property located at 131-135 Warner Road, in East Haven, Connecticut. The United States had previously commenced both civil and criminal

forfeiture proceedings against the same property based on allegations, among others, that the listed owner, Debbie M. Kerpen, had used the property to facilitate a prostitution business in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1952(a)(3) (interstate acts in aid of racketeering), and that she had also purchased the property with proceeds of that same prostitution business.

Case 3:01-cv-01959-SRU

Document 26

Filed 12/01/2004

Page 2 of 5

2. On May 27, 2003, the Court issued an Order proposed by the United States, which stated, among other things: (1) that the proceeds of the foreclosure sale of 131-135 Warner Road would be used to satisfy all adequately proven claims of three creditors, consisting of plaintiff Webster Bank, defendant BankBoston, N.A. N/K/A Fleet Bank ("Fleet Bank"), and defendant Hatman Construction, LLC ("Hatman"); and (2) "that, after any such disbursements pursuant to the Court's partial supplemental judgment, the funds remaining shall be deposited in the United States Marshals Seized Asset Deposit Account, pending the disposition of the related forfeiture actions, Civil No. 3:01CV829[(SRU)] and Criminal No. 3:02CR230(SRU)." The United States's intent in proposing that Order was to

effectuate the prompt satisfaction of the claims of the three creditors Webster Bank, Fleet Bank, and Hatman, while leaving the claims of the United States and of Robert Kerpen and Debbie M. Kerpen to be addressed later, after the criminal case against Debbie M. Kerpen was resolved. 3. The claims of all three creditors Webster Bank, Fleet Bank, and Hatman have been resolved, and counsel for all three such creditors have advised undersigned government counsel that they do not object to this case being closed. This fact was previously reported to the Court in the United State's Motion for Technical Correction of Escrow Order ("Motion for Correction"), filed on March 1, 2004. See Motion for Correction, ΒΆΒΆ 3-4 (listing disbursements paid to all three creditors, and reporting that all three creditors' counsels' had no objection to the case being closed).1

In that same Motion for Correction, the United States reported that the foreclosure Committee counsel, Fred Anthony, Esq., had advised that as soon as the Committee could disburse the remaining funds to the United States, as Ordered by the Court, then the Committee would have no objection to the case's being closed. Since -2-

1

Case 3:01-cv-01959-SRU

Document 26

Filed 12/01/2004

Page 3 of 5

4. Debbie M. Kerpen's status in this litigation has been resolved by her agreeing to forfeit 131-135 Warner Road as part of a plea of guilty in the related criminal case. Specifically, on February 25, 2004, Debbie M. Kerpen entered a guilty plea in Criminal Case No. 3:02CR230(SRU). As part of that guilty plea, Debbie M. Kerpen agreed to the forfeiture of all real properties listed in Count 45 of the Indictment in the criminal case, which list included the 131-135 Warner Road property that is the subject of the abovecaptioned litigation. Accordingly, on March 9, 2004, in Criminal Case No.

3:02CR230(SRU), this Court issued a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, which extinguished Debbie M. Kerpen's claim to the 131-135 Warner Road property. 2 5. Robert Kerpen's status in this litigation has been resolved by his having

withdrawn his claim to the property. Specifically, in a deposition of Robert Kerpen conducted on November 4, 2004, in the related civil forfeiture case of U.S. v. 37.5 Baja Sport Cruiser, et al, No. 3:01 CV 2090(PCD), Robert Kerpen withdrew his claim on the record as part of an agreed-upon settlement of, among other assets, the proceeds of the sale of 131-135 Warner Road. On November 8, 2004, in the criminal case against Debbie M. Kerpen, No. 3:02CR230(SRU), this Court issued a Final Order of Forfeiture with respect to, among other assets, 131 and 135 Warner Road. This Order extinguished the claims of all third-parties to the properties, including the claim of Robert Kerpen.

that time, the Committee has disbursed the remaining funds to the United States.

2

On November 5, 2004, Debbie M. Kerpen was sentenced in the criminal -3-

case.

Case 3:01-cv-01959-SRU

Document 26

Filed 12/01/2004

Page 4 of 5

6. The United States has no further relief to be sought in the above-captioned civil case, and requests that it be closed out. 7. Based on the foregoing, it is clear that in the matter of Webster Bank v. Debbie M. Kerpen, et al., Civil No. 3:01CV01959(SRU), all six parties have either obtained appropriate relief or withdrawn their claims, and there remain no issues left to litigate or resolve. WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully submits, based on the record of this case and of the other, related cases discussed above, that the time has come to close out the case of Webster Bank v. Debbie M. Kerpen, et al., Civil No. 3:01CV01959(SRU). Respectfully submitted KEVIN J. O'CONNOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By:

HENRY K. KOPEL ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Fed. Bar No. ct24829 157 Church Street, 23d Floor New Haven, CT 06510 (203) 821-3769

-4-

Case 3:01-cv-01959-SRU

Document 26

Filed 12/01/2004

Page 5 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY certify that I caused a copy of the foregoing to be sent by first-class mail, this 30th day of November, 2004, to counsel for each represented party, and directly to the pro se party Robert Kerpen, as follows: FORECLOSURE COMMITTEE Fred Anthony, Esq. 90 Huntington St. Shelton, CT 06484 WEBSTER BANK Tom Welch, Esq. Winnick, Vine, Welch & Todosio 375 Bridgeport Ave. Shelton, CT 06484 FLEET BANK Michael Auger, Esq. Cohen, Auger, Burns & Hard 39 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06106 HATMAN CONSTRUCTION CO. Joshua Winnick, Esq. Winnick, Ruben, Chambers, Evans and Hoffnung, LLC 110 Whitney Ave. New Haven, CT 06510 DEBBIE M. KERPEN William M. Bloss, Esq. Jacobs, Grundberg, Belt & Dow, P.C. 350 Orange Street New Haven, CT 06511 ROBERT KERPEN, PRO SE P.O. Box 263 North Haven, CT

Assistant U.S. Attorney -5-