Case 3:01-cv-02269-AWT
Document 95
Filed 06/20/2007
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT -------------------------------x STEVE ATUAHENE : : v. : : CITY OF HARTFORD : -------------------------------x STEVE ATUAHENE : : v. : : CAPONETTO ENTERPRISES, LLC, : PRECISION FOREIGN CAR SERVICE, : and VALDIS VINKELS : -------------------------------x
CASE NO. 3:01CV2269 (AWT) (MASTER CASE)
CASE NO. 3:01CV2270 (AWT) (MEMBER CASE)
PARTIAL JUDGMENT This action came on for consideration of the defendants' motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment before the Honorable Alvin W. Thompson, United States District Judge. The court considered the full record of the case including applicable principles of law, and the court filed a ruling which denied without prejudice the motion to dismiss, and granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The defendants' motion for summary judgment was granted with respect to counts two, three, four, five and six, granted with respect to count one as to defendant Vinkels, and denied without prejudice with respect to count one as to defendants Caponetto LLC and Precision Foreign Car Service. The plaintiff was given
until July 3, 2007, to inform the court whether he wishes to have the allegations in count one construed to include a claim for conversion, trespass, or both. No extension of time will be
Case 3:01-cv-02269-AWT
Document 95
Filed 06/20/2007
Page 2 of 2
granted.
In the absence of a timely response, count one will be
construed as a claim for trespass only. Accordingly, it is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of the defendants City of Hartford, Caponetto Enterprises LLC, Precision Foreign Car Service, and Valdis Vinkels with respect to counts two, three, four, five and six, and granted with respect to count one as to defendant Valdis Vinkels, and denied without prejudice with respect to count one as to defendants Caponetto Enterprises LLC and Precision Foreign Car Service. The plaintiff shall file a notice by July 3, 2007, whether he wishes to have the allegations in count one construed to include a claim for conversion, trespass, or both. In the
absence of a timely response, count one will be construed as a claim for trespass only. Dated at Hartford, Connecticut, this 20th day of June, 2007. KEVIN F. ROWE, Clerk United States District Court
By
/s/ SLS Sandra Smith Deputy Clerk