Free Answer to Amended Complaint - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 54.8 kB
Pages: 11
Date: November 18, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 2,106 Words, 13,140 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/15487/84.pdf

Download Answer to Amended Complaint - District Court of Connecticut ( 54.8 kB)


Preview Answer to Amended Complaint - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:01-cv-02298-SRU

Document 84

Filed 11/21/2005

Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JANE DOE, JR., et al. Plaintiffs, vs. CITY OF WATERBURY, et al. Defendants. SUSAN ROE, JR., et al. Plaintiffs, vs. CITY OF WATERBURY, et al. Defendants. : : : : : Master Consolidated (Lead Case) Civil 3:01CV2298 (SRU)

: : : : : :

NO.: 3:03CV00571(SRU) (Member Case)

NOVEMBER 18, 2005

ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE TO COMPLAINT DATED JULY 28, 2005 BY JANE DOE, SR., PPA JANE DOE, JR. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT: 1) The defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion

or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. PARTIES, JURISDICTION & VENUE: 2) 3) Admitted. The defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion

or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 4) The defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion
1

or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof.

NOBLE, SPECTOR, YOUNG & O'CONNOR, P.C. · ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CONGRESS STREET · HARTFORD CT 06114-1067 · JURIS NO. 409138 · TEL: (860) 525-9975 · FAX: (860) 525-9985

Case 3:01-cv-02298-SRU

Document 84

Filed 11/21/2005

Page 2 of 11

5)

The defendant admits so much of Paragraph 5 as states, "At all times mentioned herein

the defendant, Mayor Philip Giordano (hereinafter "Mayor Giordano")... was the mayor of the City of Waterbury, Connecticut who took an oath three times to uphold the Constitution of the State of Connecticut and of the United States." The remainder of Paragraph 5 is denied. 6) The defendant admits so much of Paragraph 6 as alleges, "At all times mentioned herein

the defendant, City of Waterbury (hereinafter "the City"), is and was a municipality located within the State of Connecticut with office buildings located at 235 and 236 Grand Street, governed by the effective Charter and Code of Ordinances then in effect," As to the remainder of Paragraph 6, the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 7) Paragraph 7 is admitted.

8-10) As to the allegations contained in Paragraphs 8, 9, and 10, the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof.

AMENDED COMPLAINT: 11) The defendant admits, "Under the Charter of the City of Waterbury (hereinafter "City

Charter"), Mayor Giordano was the Chief Executive Officer of the City, its highest ranking official". The remainder of Paragraph 11 is denied.
2

NOBLE, SPECTOR, YOUNG & O'CONNOR, P.C. · ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CONGRESS STREET · HARTFORD CT 06114-1067 · JURIS NO. 409138 · TEL: (860) 525-9975 · FAX: (860) 525-9985

Case 3:01-cv-02298-SRU

Document 84

Filed 11/21/2005

Page 3 of 11

12)

The defendant admits, "The City Charter establishes a "Strong Mayor" form of

government". The remainder of Paragraph 12 is denied. 13) 14-18) 19) 20-26) 27-28) 29-30) Paragraph 13 is denied. Paragraphs 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 are admitted. Paragraph 19 is denied. Paragraphs 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26 are admitted. Paragraphs 27 and 28 are denied. As to the allegations contained in Paragraphs 29 and 30, the defendant has insufficient

knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 31-32) 33) 34) Paragraphs 31 and 32 are admitted. Paragraph 33 is denied. The defendant admits, "As per Mayor Giordano's policy, cellular service bills were

paid by the City". As to the remainder of Paragraph 34, the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 35) As to the allegations contained in Paragraph 35 the defendant has insufficient

knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 36-37) Paragraphs 36 and 37 are denied.
3

NOBLE, SPECTOR, YOUNG & O'CONNOR, P.C. · ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CONGRESS STREET · HARTFORD CT 06114-1067 · JURIS NO. 409138 · TEL: (860) 525-9975 · FAX: (860) 525-9985

Case 3:01-cv-02298-SRU

Document 84

Filed 11/21/2005

Page 4 of 11

38)

As to the allegations contained in Paragraphs 38 the defendant has insufficient

knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 39-40) 41-49) Paragraphs 39 and 40 are admitted. As to the allegations contained in Paragraphs 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 and 49, the

defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 50) 51-59) Paragraph 50 is denied. As to the allegations contained in Paragraphs 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 and 59, the

defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 60-61) 62) Paragraphs 60 and 61 are denied. As to the allegations contained in Paragraph 62 the defendant has insufficient

knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 63-70) 71) Paragraphs 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 and 70 are denied. As to the allegations contained in Paragraph 71 the defendant has insufficient knowledge

or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof.

4

NOBLE, SPECTOR, YOUNG & O'CONNOR, P.C. · ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CONGRESS STREET · HARTFORD CT 06114-1067 · JURIS NO. 409138 · TEL: (860) 525-9975 · FAX: (860) 525-9985

Case 3:01-cv-02298-SRU

Document 84

Filed 11/21/2005

Page 5 of 11

COUNT ONE: 72) This Paragraph is responded to as in Paragraphs 11-71 of the answer, as if fully set forth herein. 73-76) Paragraphs 72, 73, 74, 75 and 76 are denied. 77) As to the allegations contained in Paragraph 77 the defendant has insufficient knowledge

or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 78-80) Paragraphs 78, 79 and 80 are denied. COUNT TWO: 81) This Paragraph is responded to as in Paragraphs 11-71 of the answer, as if fully set forth herein. 82-83) As to the allegations contained in Paragraphs 82 and 83, the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 84-89) Paragraphs 84, 85, 86, 87, 88 and 89 are denied. 90) As to the allegations contained in Paragraph 90 the defendant has insufficient knowledge

or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. COUNT THREE: 91) This Paragraph is responded to as in Paragraphs11-71 and Count Two as if fully set forth herein.
5

NOBLE, SPECTOR, YOUNG & O'CONNOR, P.C. · ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CONGRESS STREET · HARTFORD CT 06114-1067 · JURIS NO. 409138 · TEL: (860) 525-9975 · FAX: (860) 525-9985

Case 3:01-cv-02298-SRU

Document 84

Filed 11/21/2005

Page 6 of 11

92)

As to the allegations contained in Paragraph 92 the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof.

93)

Paragraph 93 denied.

94-95) As to the allegations contained in Paragraphs 94 and 95 the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. COUNT FOUR: 96) Paragraph 96 is responded to as in Paragraphs 11-71 of the answer as if fully set forth herein. 97) 98) Paragraph 97 is admitted. As to the allegations contained in Paragraph 98 the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 99-109) COUNT FIVE: 110) herein. 111) Paragraph 111 is denied.
6

Paragraphs 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108 and 109 are denied.

Paragraph 110 is responded to as in Paragraphs 11-71 of the answer as if fully set forth

NOBLE, SPECTOR, YOUNG & O'CONNOR, P.C. · ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CONGRESS STREET · HARTFORD CT 06114-1067 · JURIS NO. 409138 · TEL: (860) 525-9975 · FAX: (860) 525-9985

Case 3:01-cv-02298-SRU

Document 84

Filed 11/21/2005

Page 7 of 11

112-114) As to the allegations contained in Paragraphs 112, 113 and 114 the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. COUNT SIX: 115) Paragraph 115 is responded to as in Paragraph 11-71 of the answer as if fully set forth herein. 116-118) As to the allegations contained in Paragraphs 116, 117 and 118 the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. COUNT SEVEN: 119) Paragraph 119 is responded to as in Paragraphs 11-71 of the answer as if fully set forth herein. 120) Paragraph 120 is denied.

121-125) As to the allegations contained in Paragraphs 121, 122, 123, 124 and 125 the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. COUNT EIGHT: 126) herein.
7

Paragraph 126 is responded to as in Paragraphs 11-71 of the answer as if fully set forth

NOBLE, SPECTOR, YOUNG & O'CONNOR, P.C. · ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CONGRESS STREET · HARTFORD CT 06114-1067 · JURIS NO. 409138 · TEL: (860) 525-9975 · FAX: (860) 525-9985

Case 3:01-cv-02298-SRU

Document 84

Filed 11/21/2005

Page 8 of 11

127-130) As to the allegations contained in Paragraphs 127, 128, 129 and 130 the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. COUNT NINE: 131) herein. 132) Paragraph 132 is denied. Paragraph 131 is responded to as in Paragraphs 11-71 of the answer as if fully set forth

133-134) As to the allegations contained in Paragraphs 133 and 134 the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. COUNT TEN: 135) Paragraph 135 is responded to as in Paragraphs 11-71 of the answer as if fully set forth herein. 136) As to the allegations contained in Paragraph 136 the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 137) 138) Paragraph 137 is denied. As to the allegations contained in Paragraphs 138 the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof.
8

NOBLE, SPECTOR, YOUNG & O'CONNOR, P.C. · ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CONGRESS STREET · HARTFORD CT 06114-1067 · JURIS NO. 409138 · TEL: (860) 525-9975 · FAX: (860) 525-9985

Case 3:01-cv-02298-SRU

Document 84

Filed 11/21/2005

Page 9 of 11

COUNT ELEVEN: 139) Paragraph 139 is responded to as in Paragraphs 11-71 of the answer as if fully set forth herein. 140) As to the allegations contained in Paragraph 140 the defendant has insufficient knowledge or information with which to form an opinion or belief and leaves the plaintiffs to their proof. 141-142) Paragraphs 141-142 are denied. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Plaintiffs' claims are barred by the doctrine of governmental immunity.

DEFENDANT: City of Waterbury

BY: ______________________________ Elliot B. Spector Federal Bar #ct05278 Noble, Spector, Young & O'Connor One Congress Street Hartford, CT 06114 Phone: 860-525-9975 Fax: 860-525-9985 [email protected]

9

NOBLE, SPECTOR, YOUNG & O'CONNOR, P.C. · ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CONGRESS STREET · HARTFORD CT 06114-1067 · JURIS NO. 409138 · TEL: (860) 525-9975 · FAX: (860) 525-9985

Case 3:01-cv-02298-SRU

Document 84

Filed 11/21/2005

Page 10 of 11

CERTIFICATION This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed, postage prepaid, to the following counsel of record this 18th day of November, 2005.

For the Plaintiffs, Jane Doe, Sr. & Jane Doe, Jr., ppa Erskine D. McIntosh, Esquire Law Offices of Erskine D. McIntosh P.O. Box 185789 Hamden, CT 06518 Michael Stanton Hillis, Esquire Dombroski, Knapsack & Hillis 129 Whitney Avenue New Haven, CT 06510 For the Defendant, Philip Giordano Andrew B. Bowman, Esquire Law Offices of Andrew Bowman 1804 Post Road East Westport, CT 06880 Michael W. Mackniak, Esquire 87 Meadow Street Naugatuck, CT 06770 Gerald Lewis Harmon, Esquire 290 Pratt Street Meriden, CT 06450 Allison Louise Jacobs, Esquire 84 Sherman Avenue Hamden, CT 06518 Lynn Jenkins, Esquire 129 York Street, Apt. 8-L New Haven, CT 06511

________________________________ Elliot B. Spector

10

NOBLE, SPECTOR, YOUNG & O'CONNOR, P.C. · ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CONGRESS STREET · HARTFORD CT 06114-1067 · JURIS NO. 409138 · TEL: (860) 525-9975 · FAX: (860) 525-9985

Case 3:01-cv-02298-SRU

Document 84

Filed 11/21/2005

Page 11 of 11

Clerk's Office United States District Court 915 Lafayette Boulevard Bridgeport, CT 06604

NOBLE, SPECTOR, YOUNG & O'CONNOR, P.C. · ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CONGRESS STREET · HARTFORD CT 06114-1067 · JURIS NO. 409138 · TEL: (860) 525-9975 · FAX: (860) 525-9985