Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:01-cv-02024-MRK

Document 23

Filed 04/22/2004

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. : : : : : : : : : :

NO.

3:01cv2024 (MRK)

ARTHUR L. OGONOSKI, Defendant.

NOTICE

Having received Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and accompanying materials [docs. #18-21] and Defendant's Response (styled "Motion to Set Aside Motion for Summary Judgement") [doc. #22], the Court directs Plaintiff to reply to the claims made by Defendant in his Response. Plaintiff's reply should be filed by May 5, 2004. The parties are also directed to tell the Court, by May 5, 2004, whether they would like a referral to a Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference to resolve the claims in this case. .

IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Mark R. Kravitz U.S.D.J.

Dated at New Haven, Connecticut: April 21, 2004 1