Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:01-cv-02158-WWE

Document 101

Filed 08/03/2005

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DONALD WAINRIGHT, JANET WAINRIGHT and DEBORAH A. RUSSO-WILLIAMS v. OSM COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ISRAEL H. POLANSKY, ROBERT E. POLANSKY, and ANNE POLANSKY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CIV. NO. 3:01CV2158 (WWE)

CLARIFICATION OF APRIL SCHEDULING ORDER A telephone conference was held on June 29, 2005 to clarify the current scheduling order for the filing of motions for summary judgment. During the conference, all of the parties indicated that they intended to file motions for summary judgment. Accordingly, all motions for summary judgment will be filed thirty (30) days after the close of discovery. Plaintiff's

counsel indicated that he will receive defendants' compliance with discovery by fax transmission today, June 29. In accordance

with the April scheduling order in place, "[d]iscovery will close within ten (10) days of the receipt of defendants' outstanding discovery. Plaintiffs' failure to respond within ten (10) days Summary judgment will be

will effectively close discovery."

filed within thirty (30) days after the close of discovery. 1

Case 3:01-cv-02158-WWE

Document 101

Filed 08/03/2005

Page 2 of 2

This is not a recommended ruling.

This is a discovery

ruling and order which is reviewable pursuant to the "clearly erroneous" statutory standard of review. 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), 6(e) and 72(a); and Rule 2 of the Local Rules for United States Magistrate Judges. As such, it

is an order of the Court unless reversed or modified by the district judge upon motion timely made.

SO ORDERED at Bridgeport this 3rd day of August 2005.

____/s/__________________ HOLLY B. FITZSIMMONS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2