Free Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 61.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: November 29, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,088 Words, 4,326 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/15767/149-2.pdf

Download Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 61.8 kB)


Preview Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:01-cv-02158-WWE

Document 149-2

Filed 11/29/2005

Page 1 of 2

T B EO E H B T T P A N IF ' A L F X IIS O L I TF S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. 105 A. Bios ­ undated, unauthenticated and without foundation as to source, purpose or accuracy and making no reference to Anne Polansky. B. SEC Release ­ purported recital of allegations by the SEC containing no admissions of a wrong doing and not directed in any respect to Israel Polansky or Anne Polansky. C. Unauthenticated, undated corporate data regarding OSM and unsigned copy of an application for an employer identification number. D. A page from a contract between two unidentified parties without authentication or foundation. E. What appears to be a loan commitment from Ameristar Capital Corporation to OSM. F. What appears to be a memorandum from Robert Polansky to Donald Wainwright regarding employment terms. G. Acp o D nl Wa w i t e p y etot cwtO M. oy f oa d i r h s m l m n cn at i S n g' o r h H. These documents are not part of the electronic file and have not been provided to these df dn ahuh eust r o hs en ae f ln f ' e nat l og r eth e r a be m d o p i iscounsel. e st q ef a tf I. These documents are not part of the electronic file and have not been provided to these df dn ahuh eust r o hs en ae f ln f 'one e nat l og r eth e r a be m d o p i iscusl e st q ef a tf . J. These documents are not part of the electronic file and have not been provided to these df dn ahuh eust r o hs en ae f ln f 'one e nat l og r eth e r a be m d o p i iscusl e st q ef a tf . K. These documents are not part of the electronic file and have not been provided to these df dn ahuh eust r o hs en ae f ln f 'one e nat l og r eth e r a be m d o p i iscusl e st q ef a tf . L. These documents are not part of the electronic file and have not been provided to these df dn ahuh eust r o hs en ae f ln f 'one e nat l og r eth e r a be m d o p i iscusl e st q ef a tf . M. A ecpf mar sr t f oe P l sy dpsi w e iMrP l sys n n xetr o t nc p o R br o nk' eoio hr n . o nk iuable a i t a s tn e a to identify a signature card from a bank.

1

Case 3:01-cv-02158-WWE

Document 149-2

Filed 11/29/2005

Page 2 of 2

T B EO E H B T T P A N IF ' A L F X IIS O L I TF S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DOC. 105 ( n'. c t ) o d

N. What appear to be copies from an identified bank account for which no foundation was made. O. What appear to be copies from an identified bank account for which no foundation was made. P. Excerpts from the transcript of the deposition of Robert Polansky wherein Mr. Polansky t ti t t e cai ay a pr nlxessrm O M'cek g con w i e ie h h ocs nl pi e oaepne f sf s a o l d s o S s hci acut h h n c expenses werehn ou et b O M'acut t T ihs o e vneo s e t dcm n d y S s con n h a n r eac tI al e e a. s l r Polansky to Anne Polansky. Q. A copy of a 2000 K-1 from OSM to Robert Polansky showing a $14,547.00 loss having no relevance to Israel Polansky or Anne Polansky. R. An unsigned copy f oe ad ne o nk'19 t r un hwn a aj t gos o R br n A n P l sys 96 a e r so i n d s d rs t a x t g ue i o e f 1, 5 0ai cp o t P l sy 19 i o ea r un hwn a n m o $1 9. , fe oy fh o nk' 97 n m t e r so i n c 8 1 l e a s c x t g aj t gosno e f 3 8. ad ui s i o e f 2, 0 0t P l sys 99 d s d rs i m o $, 8 0 n bs esn m o $5 0. ;h o nk'19 ue c 2 0 n c 0 0 e a income tax return showing business income of $16,936.38 and an adjusted gross income loss of $1,810.18, none of which support any claim against Israel N. Polansky or Anne Polansky. S. An excerpt of what plaintiffs purport to be a transcript of the deposition of Israel Polansky w i stfr nt n i os t t i w aapa i MrP l sys fdv i spot h h e ot o i n nie wt htper n . o nk'a i i n upr c s h h g c sn h s a fa t of his motion for summary judgment. T. An excerpt of what plaintiffs purport to be a transcript of the deposition of Israel Polansky wherein Mr. Polansky relates among other things that he had sent OSM $3,000.00 or $, 0 0 h hs os t t i MrP l sy cn i t n t l af s th t e l 4 0. w i icnie wt . o nk' otb i so e le at i a 0 0 c sn h a s r uo g e em l df dn w rr r et b t sm cusl rsefr it s df dn ' e nat e e e n d yh a e oneo a stot n h e e nat e s e ps e e h e e s Memorandum. U. What appears to be a table of organization of an unidentified company at an unidentified date and with no foundation.

2