Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 29.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 15, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 299 Words, 1,874 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/15767/77.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Connecticut ( 29.2 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:01-cv-02158-WWE

Document 77

Filed 12/15/2004

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DONALD WAINRIGHT, JANET WAINRIGHT and DEBORAH A. RUSSO-WILLIAMS v. OSM COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ISRAEL H. POLANSKY, ROBERT E. POLANSKY, and ANNE POLANSKY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CIV. NO. 3:01CV2158 (WWE)

SCHEDULING ORDER On December 13, 2005, the Court received a copy of Robert Polansky's Notice of Production of Documents and Objections to document requests 6, 7, 8, 9, 17, 24, and 27-29. It is hereby

ordered that, before Monday, December 20, 2004, the parties meet and confer on the outstanding objections to the document requests. For any objections not resolved, on or before Tuesday,

December 21, 2004, the parties will file simultaneous briefs with the Court, identifying each unresolved the document request with a brief written argument supporting their position on whether the motion to compel should be granted or denied. then decide the objections on the papers. The Court will

In the meantime,

defendant will produce the documents for the time frame as to which there is no objections. The parties will contact the Court immediately if there are

Case 3:01-cv-02158-WWE

Document 77

Filed 12/15/2004

Page 2 of 2

any problems complying with this order, so that timely orders may enter. This is not a recommended ruling. This is a discovery

ruling and order which is reviewable pursuant to the "clearly erroneous" statutory standard of review. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636

(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), 6(e) and 72(a); and Rule 2 of the Local Rules for United States Magistrate Judges. As such, it

is an order of the Court unless reversed or modified by the district judge upon motion timely made.

SO ORDERED at Bridgeport this 13th day of December 2004.

________/s/___________ HOLLY B. FITZSIMMONS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE