Free Answer to Complaint - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 44.7 kB
Pages: 5
Date: September 27, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 691 Words, 4,235 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/15772/22.pdf

Download Answer to Complaint - District Court of Connecticut ( 44.7 kB)


Preview Answer to Complaint - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:01-cv-02163-RNC

Document 22

Filed 09/30/2004

Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

MARY ANN JAGGER v. MOHAWK MOUNTAIN SKI AREA, INC. AND JAMES COURTOT

: : : : : :

NO.: 3:01CV2163 (RNC)

SEPTEMBER 28, 2004

ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

Jurisdiction: 1. As to paragraph 1, the defendants do not have sufficient knowledge or

information upon which to base a belief or opinion about the truth of the matters contained therein and, therefore, leave the plaintiff to her burden of proof. 2. 3. 4. Paragraph 2 is admitted. Paragraph 3 is denied. As to paragraph 4, the defendants do not have sufficient knowledge or

information upon which to base a belief or opinion about the truth of the matters contained therein and, therefore, leave the plaintiff to her burden of proof. 5. conclusion. 6. conclusion. The defendants do not answer paragraph 6 as it states a legal The defendants do not answer paragraph 5 as it states a legal

Case 3:01-cv-02163-RNC

Document 22

Filed 09/30/2004

Page 2 of 5

FIRST COUNT: 1. 2. 3. 4. Paragraph 1 is admitted. Paragraph 2 is denied. Paragraph 3 is denied. That portion of paragraph 4 that alleges that Mr. Courtot "was

participating in a ski instructor's pre-season clinic" is admitted. The remainder of paragraph 4 is denied. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Paragraph 5 is denied. Paragraph 6 is denied. Paragraph 7 is denied. Paragraph 8 is denied. Paragraph 9 is denied.

SECOND COUNT: 1.-4. The answers to paragraphs 1 through 4 of the First Count are hereby

incorporated and made the answers to paragraphs 1 through 4 of the Second Count as if fully set forth herein. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Paragraph 5 is denied. Paragraph 6 is denied. Paragraph 7 is denied. Paragraph 8 is denied. Paragraph 9 is denied.

2

Case 3:01-cv-02163-RNC

Document 22

Filed 09/30/2004

Page 3 of 5

BY WAY OF AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES First Affirmative Defense: The plaintiff assumed the risk of her injuries in accordance with Conn. Gen. Stat. § 29-212. Second Affirmative Defense: By purchasing a Mohawk Mountain lift ticket, the plaintiff expressly assumed the risk and legal responsibility for any injury arising out of the hazards inherent in the sport of skiing, and agreed not to sue Mohawk Mountain if injured while skiing. Third Affirmative Defense: If the plaintiff sustained the injuries, losses and damages alleged, they were caused by her own negligence and carelessness in one or more of the following ways: a. She did not know the range of her own ability to negotiate the trail or

slope upon which she was skiing in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 29-214(1); b. She did not ski within the limits of her own ability in violation of Conn.

Gen. Stat. § 29-214(2); c. She did not maintain reasonable control of her speed and course at all

times while skiing in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 29-214(3); d. 29-214(4); e. She failed to comply with the Skier's Responsibility Code; She did not heed all posted warnings in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. §

3

Case 3:01-cv-02163-RNC

Document 22

Filed 09/30/2004

Page 4 of 5

f. g. h. condition; i. j.

She failed to keep a proper lookout for other skiers on the trail; She failed to keep herself under reasonable and proper control; She failed to maintain her skis and bindings in proper and safe operating

She used ski equipment that was inappropriate to her level of ability; She was otherwise negligent or careless under the circumstances then

and there existing.

DEFENDANTS, MOHAWK MOUNTAIN SKI AREA, INC. AND JAMES COURTOT

By_______________________________ Philip T. Newbury, Jr. Howd & Ludorf 65 Wethersfield Avenue Hartford, CT 06114 (860) 249-1361 (860) 249-7665 (FAX) ct05283

4

Case 3:01-cv-02163-RNC

Document 22

Filed 09/30/2004

Page 5 of 5

CERTIFICATION This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been sent, handling charges prepaid, via U.S. Mail to the following counsel of record this 28th day of September, 2004. Jack D. Miller, Esquire Andrew W. Bray, Esquire Regnier, Taylor, Curran & Eddy CityPlace I, 28 Floor Hartford, CT 06103

_________________________________ Philip T. Newbury, Jr. Howd & Ludorf 65 Wethersfield Avenue Hartford, CT 06114 (860) 249-1361 (860) 249-7665 (FAX) ct05283

5