Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:01-cv-02166-JCH

Document 92

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PRISONER CIVIL NO. 3:01CV2166 (JCH)(HBF)

DUANE ZIEMBA v. JOHN ARMSTRONG, ET AL.

: : :

JULY 28, 2004

DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the defendants move for summary judgment on the following grounds: A. B. C. The plaintiff cannot demonstrate the requisite personal involvement of the defendants in the alleged constitutional violation(s); The plaintiff cannot demonstrate that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs or that they used excessive force; The defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.

In support thereof, the defendants submit the following: A. B. Memorandum of Law with attachments; Defendants' Local Rule 56(a)(2) Statement. DEFENDANTS, John Armstrong, Kevin DeGray, Larry Myers, and Reginald McAllister RICHARD BLUMENTHAL ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: ____/s/________________________________ Matthew B. Beizer Assistant Attorney General 110 Sherman Street Hartford, CT 06105 Federal Bar #ct16304 E-Mail: [email protected] Tel: (860) 808-5450 Fax: (860) 808-5591

Case 3:01-cv-02166-JCH

Document 92

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed to the following this 28th day of July, 2004: Duane Ziemba #128963 Northern Correctional Institution P.O. Box 665 Somers, CT 06071

_____/s/_____________________________ Matthew B. Beizer Assistant Attorney General

2