Free Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 53.3 kB
Pages: 1
Date: July 22, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 350 Words, 2,229 Characters
Page Size: 591.6 x 784.08 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/19666/93.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut ( 53.3 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Connecticut

§\ J [Fee 3:02-cv-0172Qt/C Document 93 Filed 07/ZQO4 Page 1 of 1
¤ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT L? Q lm E H if
G, ° FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICU A
4: cv
4;% ‘ lllllll .llll.\b‘F’ 3=\b
o u
) .
T, "gg EAsco HAND roors, mc., ) .0.5. Ulgxlfiégg CSTURT 1
vg #5 » ARMSTRONG roors mc., ) 1Wi · ’ ‘ ,
lj jg KINGSLEY TOOLS INC., LEA WAY ) Civil Action No. 3:02 CV 1723 (AVC) ¤
g 4; HAND TOOL CORPORATION, AND ) Consolidated with Civil Action No. 3:02
S (D MATCO TOOLS CORPORATION, ) CV 1747 (AVC)
ui .c: · )
§ ;’ , Piamurrs, )
cv ·H¤ L vi ) -
g rg , 5 VS. g
GS ... 5..- i
. m ° HU6HOU?FEI§/kia BOBBY HU, _ )
•• *,,.....
Q ·¤' gw · ) July 16, 2004 “ »
E § ; V Q Q_ 5 Defendant. g 1
M Fc L -_ V
‘° ,0.- ( . N 1.5;;; »
.“.?. ° L [E Q
4-* rg ZITION FOR ENTRY OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
e: 0. cu @5
0 -·—n i $.4 $3 W. »
iq ~ E On Tuesday, July 13, 2004, the Court held the "Markman" Claim Construction Hearing
¤ c: o A .
5 8 "Hearing") in this matter and construed the disputed terms of the ‘387 patent at issue. Plaintiffs
fg 4:
8 2 Easco Hand Tools, Inc., Armstrong Tools, Inc., Kingsley Tools, Inc., Lea Way Hand Tool . A
JJ
In .
,§ ,5 Corporation, and Matco Tools Corporation ("Easco") proffered the following constructions: (1)
U § "ratcheting tool" - a tool having a mechanism that consists of a bar or wheel having inclined
s.» .0 I
*3 E teeth with which a pawl interacts so that motion can be imparted to the wheel or bar; (2) "drive_¤
. c zu
E *3 member’_’ — a shaft or shaft-like structure extended beynd the compartment; (3) "motmted — held
o cv
E 'Q in position for use"; and (4) "bearing — touching sufficient to create a reactive force. At the close
2 Q
B I; of the Hearing the Court provided its construction of the disputed terms as shown in the table
• fj • '·
g 2 _below. I
O ·•·| (I) •
cw s.» ¤
4.» cu ca
~ cu .¤ ns
v-I [IJ
N an cw cn
E D5 >
>~·-·—• cv O
»-• ru Ul (
:3 .-1 cu O , r
ID o om (
. · ` it
,. _ . 1