Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 94.9 kB
Pages: 4
Date: April 5, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 796 Words, 4,804 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22500/147.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 94.9 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG Document 147 Filed O4/05/2005 Page 1 of 4 I
F 5 lg. fg D 1
1 i
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT [mw APH-5 FDI2:2| 1
2 I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT U·$.i;i:{{N YA 2A¥U{T !
3. iii;} 'W ·I‘‘` ·' %
' " ' . .. . .J' i
4 F
WASLEY PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED AND Master Consolidated Case i
5 1
PRECISION MOLDING COMPANY Inc Civil No.3:03CV 383 (MRK) 1
6 Q
Plaintiffs, Formerly
7
v. No. 3:O3CV383 (DJS)
8
Barry Leonard Bulakites, James Albert I
9 E
Winslow et al. ;
10
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLACE CO NSEL I
11 p
12 1
Defendants Bulakites and Winslow request a brief extension of time up to and l
13
including April 11, 2005 be granted to obtain counsel to replace Attorney’s
14
Fitzmaurioe and Rydel. This letter is pursuant to conversation with Judge
15 1
Squatrito on March 9m pertaining to his order of March 3“*2005 granting
16
Fitzmaurice and Rydel’s motion to withdraw.
17
18
Mr. Bulakites phoned the Court and spoke to Judge Squatrito on the morning of
19
March 9m regarding the Courts order and to request an extension of time. 1
20 1
Defendants Bulakites and Winslow had not received the Court’s order until
21 f
March Tm therefore allowing only a few days to secure replacement counsel. i
22 _
Defendants Bulakites and Winslow are actively engaged in conversation with a !
23 .
new firm that they desire represent them in this matter who requested that we
24
I
phone the Court. Unfortunately, the Attorney that has been selected has been 1
25 1
, 1 R
__________“___________________*________________________u___________......,,.................F...~—.-—~

V
Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG Document 147 Filed O4/05/2005 Page 2 of 4
4
4
1 on trial and was unavailable to review case files and has not had the _
2 opportunity to speak with Attorney Fitzmaurice. i
3
4 Given these facts we were asked to call the court and request a brief i
5 extension of time to allow them to get files and file an appearance. Mr.
6 Bulakites called the Court and spoke to Judge Squatrito on the morning on
7 March 9m, 2005 and explained the predicament. Judge Squatrito indicated that
B he felt a brief extension should not be a problem and indicated he would é
9 inform his Clerk and have him call Mr. Bulakites later that day if there was i
10 a problem. Q
11 B
4
12 On March 10, 2005 we called the Clerk to verify if a letter needed to be :
13 submitted and were informed to file this motion. Defendants Bulakites and E
14 Winslow filed a motion for extension of time up to an including March 24“‘
15 2005 to have replacement counsel file an appearance. i
16
17 Subsequent to that motion defendants were notified that Judge Squatrito had `
18 transferred the consolidated case Judge Kravitz in New Haven. Defendants are E
19 therefore in discussion with firms in New Haven regarding these new
20 developments. The firm we have selected is in the process of obtaining files i
21 and prior records from the case. We expect that they will file their
22 appearance on or before April l, 2005 and therefore respectfully request the
23 extension. i
24 I
25 I
4

- Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG Document 147 Filed O4/05/2005 Page 3 of 4 Q
I
1 Defendants have also recently learned that Attorney Zakarian of Day, Berry & 9 _
2 Howard represents one of the p1aintiff's in this case. We believe that this x
3 represents a conflict in that Attorney Zakarian has represented Defendant
4 Bulakites as part of an employment matter in the past. Further Day, Berry &
5 Howard were consulted with regard to this case by defendants during which
6 discussions Day, Berry & Howard may have obtained confidential information I
7 that the defendants provided. We are researching this further and expect to 0 {
8 make further motions based on this fact. I
9
1 0 DEFENDENTS:
11 Barry Leonard Bulakites
12 And
13 James Albert Winslow
a
14
l5 BY; -9 B i Q I
16 - »· 'J —A M_"U ‘
9 l
17 Barry Leonard Bulakites i
18
19
20 I
e
21
22
za l
24 N
25
1
.. 3
l
`


l
Case 3:03-cv-00383-WIG Document 147 Filed O4/05/2005 Page 4 of 4 E
l
CERTIFICATION T
This is to certify that a copy ofthe foregoing was mailed, first class mail on March 24m l
to: l
Deborah S Freeman Esq. \
Bryan Short Esq.
Bingham McCutchen ~
One State Street l
Hartford, CT 06103 E _
Albert Zakarian, Esq. i
Vistoria Woodin Chavey, Esq. `
Eric Suusman Esq. i
Day, Berry & Howard
CityPlace 3
Hartford, CT 06103 T
Thomas G Moukawsher Esq
Ian O. Smith Esq. q
Moukawsher & Walsh l
21 Oak Street Suite 209
Hartford, CT 06106 q
Joseph V. Meaney, Jr. Esq. r
Cranmore, Fitzgerald & Meaney {
49 Wethersfield Ave.
Hartford, CT 06114 I
Dated :_‘___ , y"
Byr
.M' . ’~ so
!
l
l
l
l
T A
l
I