Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 52.2 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 503 Words, 3,100 Characters
Page Size: 611 x 790 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22500/180.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 52.2 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv—00.383·-WIG Document 180 Filed 07/ 1 5/2005 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
WASLEY PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL., MASTER CONSOLIDATED CASE
CIVIL NO. 3:03 CV 383 (MRK) A
Plaintiffs,
THIS PERTAINS TO:
CIVIL NO. 3:03 CV 1790 (MRK)
V. · (Prentiss et al. v. Wasley Products, Inc. et al.)
BARRY BULAKITES, ET AL., `
Defendants. JULY 14, 2005 0
WASLEY DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION .
e FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
` TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SETS OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS
· Pursuant to Rules 26, 33, and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 7(b) of
the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants Wasley Products, Inc., Alan Wasley, Andrew
Brady, Sandi Dumas-Laferriere and Barry Connell (the "Wasley Defendants") hereby move for
an extension of time of thirty (30)_days, up to and including August 25, 2005, to respond, by
either answer or objection, to plaintiffs’ first sets of interrogatories and requests for production of
I documents issued to each ofthe Wasley Defendants. In support of this motion, the undersigned
represents that the discovery requests seeks information dating back over a period of more than
ten years. Additional time is needed to locate and review information and prepare appropriate
responses, particularly given that many of the defendants will be out of town at various times
during the course of the next few weeks.
This is the Wasley Defendants’ first motion seeking an extension of time to respond to
plaintiffs’ discovery requests. The undersigned contacted plaintiffs’ counsel, Thomas

Case 3:03-cv—003831W|G Document 180 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 2 of 3
Moukawsher, who does not obj ect to the requested extension. This matter has not yet been
assigned for trial.
DEPENDANTS
WASLEY PRODUCTS, INC., ALAN A.
WASLEY, ANDREW BRADY, SANDI DUMAS-
LAFERRIERE, AND BARRY CONNELL
) ,
By:
0 heodore I. Tucci (ct05249)
= [email protected]
Jean E. Tomasco (ct09635)
jto1nasco@1‘c.com -
· Robinson & Cole LLP
280 Trumbull Street
. ‘ Hartford, CT 06103-3597
- Tel. No.: (860) 275-8200
‘ . Fax: (860) 275-8299

Case 3:03-cv—00383qW|G Document 180 Filed 07/15/2005 Page 3 of 3
- CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed, first class postage prepaid, on
the 14th day of July, 2005 to the following:
Thomas G. Moukawsher,`Esq.
Ian O. Smith, Esq. _
Moukawsher & Walsh
21 Oak Street, Suite 209
Hartford, CT 06106
- Steven J. Errante, Esq.
° Eric P. Smith, Esq.
Lynch, Traub, Keefe and Errante, P.C.
` 52 Trumbull Street
P. O. Box 1612
` New Haven, CT 06506
q Sara R. Simeonidis, Esq. _
Deborah S. Freeman, Esq. _ ‘ ·
· · Bryan D. Short, Esq. ·
Bingham McCutchen
One State Street - _
Hartford, CT 06103-3178
Albert Zakarian, Esq.
Victoria Woodin Chavey, Esq.
Eric. L. Sussman, Esq.
Day, Berry & Howard
CityPlace
Hartford, CT 06103-3499
Joseph V. Meaney, Jr., Esq.
Cranmore, Fitzgerald & Meaney
49 Wethersfield Ave.
Hartford, CT 06114-1102 p
4 /*1-"
U; ` . ’_M1L:r ;
». n E. Tomasco