Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 88.8 kB
Pages: 4
Date: September 27, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 547 Words, 3,539 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22500/223.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 88.8 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-OO3 3—W IG Document 223 Filed O9L2.3/2005 Page 1 of 4 I
‘ IL.
FILED ,
‘ ][]l}5 SEP 23 P F Sq 3,
0.5. Qi$?`·Ql¥$ll?3} ICQQRT r
ptfyn rt ’ 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT {
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
WASLEY PRODUCTS, INC. ET AL., MASTER CONSOLIDATED CASE
‘ CIVIL NO.: 3:03 CV 383 (MRK) .
Plaintiffs,
THIS PLEADING PERTAINS TO l
CIVIL NO.: 3:03 CV 1790 (MRK) N
v.
BARRY BULAKITES, JAMES September 22, 2005 l
WINSLOW, & JOSHUA ADAMS l
CORPORATION.
Defendants. J
WASLEY PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO l
RESPOND TO THE SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND ~
REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF THE BULAKITES DEFENDANTS
I Pursuant to Local Rule 7, Plaintiff WASLEY PRODUCTS, INC AND
PRECISION MOLDING COMPANY, collectively known as the "Wasley Plaintit`fs" l
requests an extension of time of 30 days, until November 5th, 2005 to respond to the
second set of interrogatories and requests for production of BARRY BULAKITES,
JAMES WINSLOW, & THE JOSHUA ADAMS CORPORATION, collectively
known as the “Bulal documents and Interrogatory answers from their first set of Interrogatories and I
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED q
TESTIMONY Nor REQUIRED . J
CRANMORE, FITZGERALD 8: MEANEY • ATTORNEYS AT LAW l
49 WETHERSFIELD AVENUE • HARTFORD, CONNECTlCUT 061144102 • (860) 522-910D
,___r _ _ A- -- rr .. A .. A __ ,_ __ r_ __ W _‘
eaes22$,,,r.-t I, _ n O -O-O`l`O T i`P‘i‘e To **'· **`- `++i
;,I,g.,,5§(s_,,,,___; g I llnlnl _ I .` T . `i‘i‘i‘ OT;-· -**i '¥*Y S4`.

Case 3:03-cv-OOSE3-YVIG Document 223 Filed O9/2362005 Page 2 of 4 l
-
I
Requests for Product while simultaneously sending a supplementary Second set of
Interrogatories. The Plaintiffs respectfully request an extension of 30 days in order to
!
fully comply. i
1
I
PLAINTIFFS 1
WASLEY PRODUCTS, ET AL.
BY;
JO V. MEANEY . `
Cranmore, FitzGerald eaney
49 Wethersfield Avenue T
Hartford, CT 06114
Fed Bar No: 04315 U T
A 1
1
i
1
H
cnmumonn,mzeenm.¤a.mEAmEv · Armmvevs AT mw
49 WETHEHSFIEED AVENUE • HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06114-1102 • (860) 522-9100 -
1

Case 3:03-cv-OO3§3-\{V|G Document 223 Filed O9/2362005 Page 3 of 4 I
1
1
1
1
CERTIFICATION 1
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed, via First 1
Class mail,-this 22nd day of September, 2005 to all counsel and pro se parties 1
of record: 1
Sara Simeonidis, Esq.
Bingham McCutchen, LLP y
1 State Street 1
Hartford, CT 06103-3178 . i
1
Douglas W. Bartinik, Esq.
Eric Sussman, Esq. ‘
Day, Berry & Howard, LLP
City Place I 1
Hartford, CT 06103-3499 1
Nancy A. Fitzpatrick, Esq. . 1
Steven Errante, Esq. ‘
Lynch, Traub, Keefe, and Errante, LLP i
52 Trumbull Street 1
P.O. Box 1612 ‘ 1
New Haven, CT 06506-1612
1
Thomas Moukawsher, Esq. . 1
Moulcawsher & Walsh, LLC
1
1
cnmmone.r=1TzeenAL¤&MeAmev . Arromvevs Anaw
49 weraeeseneto Avenue · HARTFORD, cowmecncur 06114-1102 . mem 522-emu 1 i

{
Case 3:03-cv-OO3§34\(VIG Document 223 Filed O9{23»j2005 Page 4 of 4
` 1
21 Oak Street, Suite 209 1
Hartford, CT 06106
Theodore Tucci, Esq _
J eau Tomasco, Esq. I
Robinson & Cole, LLP _
280 Trumbull Street I
Hartford, CT 06103-3597 C
BY; E
J V. Mea , Jr.
I 1
I
I l
1
. CRANMORE. FITZGERALD & MEANEY • ATTORNEYS AT LAW
49 WETHERSFIELD AVENUE • HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 0611+1102 • (860) 522-9100
I