Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

ITTQQiX.Y.`i¥I"`"i` ```` "_—T"`;`—“""“i"“““““J”iTPTT"`T“”`"l""‘J"""‘i"l"“i”""lT“““‘““IT“’m“_*l
{T ase 3:03-cv-00386-AWT Document 16 Filed 1 1/05/2003 Page 1 of 1 l
/ . . -·*f L ;· ¤ *"`i'? i
[7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTE 2; - E·:1 \
\ DISTRICT or | 4 I
l I . r ~ 1--» l
=l¢¤|==l=*>I<=l<*>l=¤I<¤l¢**>I<>l=>l==I==l¢¤l¢¤l<>l==I==l¢=|==I¤l¢=l=¤I¢=I¢=l==I=¤!¢=i¤1¢¤k=!¢=I¢5l= ‘_.`l
EUNICE SMITH * H I %/
Plaintiff * CIVIL NO. 3:0BCi/00386 (AWT) W
•i· I ' i
~ l
vs. * I r
* i i l
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, *
STATE OF CONNECTICUT * _ I
Defendant * OCTOBER 224 2003
=I=¤l¢=l¤=!¢¤I<=l¢>l=*=I<***>I¤=I¢*****¤l¢***¤i¢****$$*##¤I¤***
. I 1

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION EOR ENLARGQMENT
Pursuant to L. Civ R. 9 (b), the plaintiff, Eunice Smith hbreby respectfully
2 I I
requests an enlargement of time of thirty (30) days in which td rezipond and/or object to l
the defendant’s interrogatories dated October 14, 2003. The instairt motion is
submitted on the following grounds: * i
l. This is the first request by the plaintiff for an extehsiclm of time with N
respect to the approved pretrial deadlines andJ0r discovery. ?
I
2. The undersigned is currently on trial for the next weellc in the matter
g EB Q5 Fill l
of John Sobczak v. Meriden Board 0fEducaii0n, Docket No. CV-l98—04l954'7. §* Q 5 y
2 We t yl
3. Thereafter, commencing on the 4* of November, the lundersigned is 8 r ` %.
scheduled to commence trial in the matter of Higgins v. Hamrnonii. Civil No; K7 i
I I I .3
3:02C\/1863 (RNC). C g _A q I--i __ \ l
4. Plaintiff s undersigned counselor’s office has tblephonically ri; ·
communicated with defendant’s counselor, on the above-refeiiended date and E 4 A =
. E _ I 5
I I l 2 .
` I i 2 4;. l
ij y L
I § tl .1
I 2 y .5 i
- -. `._' ’ " ‘ - - *
.p.,. g L is iiii I
_·.e,i e—-, O .0 I _P I. .0. 00.00--5-LTITTTF-¤¤i -. ¥.%€-?¥.Y { {C {-i ¥;¥