Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

- --——— Document 34 Filed 06/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
7 l 4;- l s :.¢ . it .-1..1 ._e. i 53;C°";60 (
E ul [ i I; t §=* = . I`- __ _.»;.... _cv;
T,. l “ Kravitz, J.
Zllllb J!_‘€`·l -5 {3 iJ@`l'lt€d States COUIT of Appeals E
ron ras ,
C , __ ..- _,_ SECOND CIRCUIT -
U.Qi.NE-.' , ` .-!£stT
At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second ’
Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, at Foley Square, ·
in the City of New York, on the 24th Day of June, Two thousand and five.
Present:
i Hon. Ralph K. Winter, _ p . _
Hon. Rosemary S. Pooler, Q%1!>$€;*FL¤
Hon. Sonia Sotomayor, __.§° <.‘%._
Circuit Judges. :‘ JUN Z 4 ZUGS °‘°
U 4;;% B·Mn · \
Thomas J. Jeffreys, SOUND Clad`)
U Plaintiff-Appellant,
‘ v. 04-6395-cv
Teamsters Union Local 1150,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appellant, pro se, has tiled papers in response to this Cou1t’s order, entered February 22,
2005, directing the appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as lacking an
, arguable basis in law or fact. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that the appeal is
DISMISSED as lacking an arguable basis in law or fact. See 28 U.S.C. § 19I5(e); Pillay v. INS,
45 F.3d 14, 16-17 (2d Cir. 1995) @curiarn) (holding that this Court has inherent authority to
dismiss an appeal as frivolous when the appeal presents no arguably meritorious issue).
. FOR THE COURT:
R rm MacKechnie, C rk
‘ .2 5, ·
l . QQYW 1.ei*:r§w¤"W`-nm "
` SAO CAD
I
l Bf!/M .4; /’i61~’·@»;·f.·2. ‘ iq.?-af * r
1