Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

l · L)mTc=;0l blcmlcis l)l$Tri;T
l com
l l l l. Fl
l DIBTFICT Ol? C0mrwc.C,ll?.uT _
l _ a ZUH5 FEB 2L: I3 L1; gu
' JC) l/YIGB F`f`l@l4lf’lV1(>¤ mg ,
l l l l-lg;l‘; s >ll¤‘r. ms;}
{ V· lF<¤c) (Wm) l
1 Vvcvrmc; C©l€TTe, ETFIL l?‘°·l’l""*l`§( @‘¤—=QOO$` l
{ jD€p€l`1C>lC3lYW—l.g I md l•\/ UQ-l C (qpqC`{T,‘TCS i
l lTl€l`YlO]`Oll’§CjUYYj ln __®PQC>$lTl’O¤ To llllc?
DG. @0 cml`5 MOTIOW TO Ohgmlgg Tm; Qmcncled
C O mp I0} ml
-
léljléllmllpp jgmgg fY]<|<" l .d l.
l WOT l_l¤_G COUFT will n€vé?mLi3>2.TgEmOl§l$& gl/rl`Clg1&£]n2C;l Thi @\ll FOR }J@Cl€l` RWE ig is €> l`€CQL2lPmcj cz Tl"l Q1 . Qlczcilse $@6;;. l:*lrw©lc;r~5c>n V. Llbccflij
l. Okbljg 2 IHC 0 Ll`l7.. OMS, QYIQ ,1LlC1, IOQ QT {1505 ,QSlC>{·@t|
L .5 l ,.32032 QICMZL,).
Ll- I Jomcp YYl_n @lcll‘¤~Wl°lf` gagcsc r€—g,p¤—;¤TPUllj» l
l`@q>uT T0 l¤ Cll`Cl$ @5 Om QTTGPHGW, l
Res l cqTl—Lll
Plc; Kmvp V l
lB KQMGTB Vlfllilflhflcrw pwcsc
l
1 l lll. lll-

_ M b Case 3:03-cv—OO9 i|ed O2/24/200%— Page20f2_ -—_Im—
I
I
I I pw I . I
[ POI"€.%OIY}Cj vocab Im<>I ¤IcacI To Unc QI<:F`c;rmIc;m`I"s
I —— I I
I I ` I — ~ M I
J IQ 0r*¤c% op I`€C0r<,I pCbrUqI*xé._QI,2OO$
I I;> »—I I » I
€I`c¤<;Ic;Ir1I$ IVICIIVICIUCII C·C|pC1C_I—I—L6'j
\/O V1 ` ,
EOVWIQWQG g cirkpl S¤I¤wII¤I<
QQ Mn Idcanbnculf}
.U Ci "US Cm; _
III ICI Ilcnqvqr, I>°II*(jI
"IIWI T°“g,LIOI` ¤j§wMm¤I;,.w_§>

mi`—T"_*“ wr 5 I(' ,.
I<¤I?~l¤¢¤ II I<¤¤T¤¤ ·~?I`¤V£CBwI§Y£II‘€`£‘??C£°I$€i2,
IIO, SIIGPWICM 3`[‘vcw;III` 5U@Dp]“Ci`IOI CT{OQO
I·~IGII`Tp0v`cI C0Inncx`I]CuI`I- 5:0
@@05
I
I