Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 57.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: May 11, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 471 Words, 2,886 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22883/29.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 57.7 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
I ‘’‘ ‘s—s‘——T“‘t“_—‘__‘“““—‘——r"*"‘""_+*—*""““f—_·¤
{ , Case 3:IO3-cv-OO9?5)TPS Document 29 Filed 05/10/2004, q· t,Pégta. >< Ii MM I-- I
I . I I
. I I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ·i I- - ’ ·
DISTRICT OF CONNECTIC%`E Q gm g
DIRECTV, : I I
I “"‘ttt%I*°tt“ ts
Plaintiff, : 303C 3 ( SIA 2
g 0.3. 0l__3;fI*EiC`I CQURT
vs. I Et·lI\l% I I G?-RD. C I`.
GEORGE MPIRTINEZ, RICHARD z
MATHER, E SHALLIS, DAVID :
BRAISE, and OROTHEA BIEHLER :
Defendants. MAY 6, 2004
DEFENDANT DOROTHEA BIEHLER’S
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
PursuaI1t to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and Local Rule 7(b), Defendant DOROTHEA BIEHLER,
by her attomeyis, SNOW, ATTICKS & HOLLO, LLC, hereby respectfully moves the Court for
an extension oI`time to respond to the Plaintiff" s motion for summary judgment until May 21,
i
2004. This 1n excusable negIect on the part of the Defenda;nt’s counsel in that he failed to calendar the response
I I
due date. Thi:I extension is also being requested to enable the Plaintiff and Defendant to discuss I
a settlement tlIat will obviate the need to tile a response. I
I 5
This islthe first request for an extension of this time period. The Plaintiffs counsel has I
indicated that e does not consent to the granting of this motion.
DEFEND · * gg
I DOROT » : 7 I"
. / \ I
. · /
By
I · ie S. I-Iollo (CT-] 38)
I ‘ ow, Atticks & Hollo, LLC
I 69 Wall Street, Madison, CT 06443
I Tel: (203) 245-4800/ Fax—(203) 245-4495
I Email: [email protected] I
I
gg g' gggr g- gggg- gg gg _ _ I g g '.'‘ "' ”‘ ’*g
....__ i no .... ;;-ee-2-—.e`;.-.;-.;
- __ - g, gg --..... . .
g. gggg. gg g_ gg g_ gggg_ ggg ___·_.. · ·· g·-· =·~:-e
.._____ _ { · of ,¤.;_,;i;;;f1%-—¥·—%—-¥——e-.--
· gg - __ - - __ ----.... _

I .m.. .,._ __ l ___
l . Case 3:03-cv-OO95§j_3i|' PS Document 29 Filed 05/1 O/2004 Page 2 of 2
I ; L)
I ‘l
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The unl ersigned hereby certifies that on May 6, 2004, a copy ofthe foregoing was served
via first class l`lI]3.l], postage prepaid, upon all counsel and pro se parties of record as follows:
I Stephen M. Tarmenbaum, Esq.
I Lonstein Law Office, P.C.
l Terrace Hill
\ Ellenville, NY 12428-0351
Q
Gregory J. Sachs, Esq.
420 East Main Street
i Bldg. 2, Suite 4
Branford, CT 06405
u
Mr. Richard Mather
I 54 Gale Avenue
E Meriden, CT 06450
N
i Mr. Ed Shallis
{ 1 Goffin Court
2 0 r ei., CT 06478
I x or /
I •,., l
i l
I ra s. Horro i
N