Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 30.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 10, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 443 Words, 2,762 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22907/72.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 30.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00977-CFD

Document 72

Filed 03/13/2006

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT WENDELL HARP and ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL COLLABORATIVE INTERNATIONAL, P.C., Plaintiffs, v. JOHN DeSTEFANO, CITY OF NEW HAVEN and NEW HAVEN BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

CASE NO: 3:03CV977(CFD)

MARCH 10, 2006

MOTION ON CONSENT FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a) and Local Rule 7(b), Defendants, John DeStefano, Jr., City of New Haven and the New Haven Board of Education ("Defendants"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby request extensions of time until April 14, 2006 to file their Reply Brief to Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment and to file a memoranda in opposition to Plaintiffs' request to strike certain paragraphs of Defendants' Local Rule 56 Statement. Defendants' Reply Brief is currently due on March 22, 2006, and its opposition to Plaintiffs' requests to strike certain portions of Defendants' Local Rule 56 Statement, if such requests are considered to constitute a motion to strike under Local Rule 7(a), is currently due on March 28, 2006. Defendants seek these extensions, because the undersigned counsel has been on vacation until yesterday and needs additional time to file these responsive pleadings. This is the first request by Defendants for an extension of time to file a Reply Brief and to file an opposition memorandum to Plaintiffs' requests to strike certain

Case 3:03-cv-00977-CFD

Document 72

Filed 03/13/2006

Page 2 of 3

portions of Defendants' Local Rule 56 Statement. Plaintiffs' counsel consents to the granting of this motion. WHEREFORE, Defendants move that the deadline for filing a Reply Brief and a Memorandum in Opposition to requests to strike certain portions of Defendants' Local Rule 56 Statement be extended until April 14, 2006. DEFENDANTS, JOHN DESTEFANO, CITY OF NEW HAVEN and NEW HAVEN BOARD OF EDUCATION By: s/Carolyn W. Kone Carolyn W. Kone (ct06207) Rowena A. Moffett (ct19811) BRENNER, SALTZMAN & WALLMAN LLP Their Attorneys 271 Whitney Avenue New Haven, CT 06511 Tel. (203) 772-2600 Fax (203) 772-4008 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]

9i0629.doc

2

Case 3:03-cv-00977-CFD

Document 72

Filed 03/13/2006

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the original of the foregoing was served this 10th day of March, 2006, by U.S. first class mail, postage prepaid, upon:

John R. Williams Katrena Engstrom Law Offices of John Williams & Associates 51 Elm St., Ste. 409 New Haven, CT 06510 Jennifer C. Vickery Assistant Corporation Counsel City of New Haven 165 Church Street New Haven, CT 06510 ______s/Carolyn W. Kone_______ Carolyn W. Kone

9i0629.doc

3