Free Motion to Quash - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 47.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: July 27, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 425 Words, 2,450 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22916/123-1.pdf

Download Motion to Quash - District Court of Connecticut ( 47.7 kB)


Preview Motion to Quash - District Court of Connecticut
__ _._____.._...._.._,.._.,,__mr.....;.......€..r.,,,.rr,ue,..r..- --..... ...............---...Lrr.,r
. Case 3:03-cv-00986-JCH Document 123 Filed 07/25/2005 Page 1 of 3 I
Q i
fr 10,
UNITED STATES orsrmcr couizr it 1 il
msrmcr or CONNECTICUT 2005 JUL 25 A Q: Ob
SUSAN wooo, ) civir ACTION No,-;_ W ,.,, W I
) s;0S-cv-9S6 (Jon) ‘ ~0·-» ,1 ¤T‘ rr 1
Piamrirrg ) " I
. > g
—agamst— ) I
SEMEEA ENERGY TRADING coma ‘ I , I
Defendant. g I
) July zs, zoos I
l 1
1 1
1
MoT1oN TO ouAsn SuE1>oENA Eucss TECUM os cUSTomAN or
mrcouns or PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKEB, LLP g

Paul, Hastings, J anofksy & Walker respectfully moves to quash the I
1
A subpoena duces tecum served on it by Plaintiffs on July 22, 2005, commanding its
Custodian of Records to produce numerous documents at U.S. District Court in `
Bridgeport on July 25, 2005 at 9 a.m. The Court should quash the subpoena because (l) I
it was not served in a timely manner, as Plaintiff did not serve it until one business day I
1
before trial begins; (2) it seeks documents that constitute privileged attorney work
product revealing legal theories, opinions and/or strategies; (3) it is unduly burdensome
as it would require Movant, Defendant’s attorney, to halt trial preparation and spend I
precious time complying with the document production request the day before trial I
begins; and (4) seeks irrelevant infomation and is more burdensome than probative. I
1
1
1
1




l
` Case 3:03-cv-00986-JCH Document 123 Filed 07/25/2005 Page 2 of 3
‘ l
Dated: July @j2005 Respectfully Submitted,
Mary Dollarhide I
Raymond Bertrand g
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
1055 Washington Blvd., 10th Floor
Stamford, Connecticut 06902 {
Counsel for Defendant Sempra Energy
Trading Corp.
i
i
l
l
l
l
l
i E
§
r
I
I

l
l
l
l
1
l
2 I
r
l

` Case 3:03-cv-00986-JCH Document 123 · Filed 07/25/2005 Page 3 of 3
I
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I
I
This is to certify that true and correct copies of the foregoing Motion to I
Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum of Custodian of Records of Sempra Energy Trading Corp. I
was served on the following parties this 25th day of July, 2005 by U.S. mail upon:
Brendan J. O’Rourke
O’Rourke & Associates, LLC I
27 Pine Street
New Canaan, CT 06840 I
I
I , I
Raym d Bertrand
I
I
S'[`Mf3U043S. I I
07/24/05
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3
I
I