Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

1 iT‘;°`“—”“T_““_*"+—"‘*·—“·—·“r··—·——Mr—~···~·~rm·r——-*~—————~————-l*———~—~—
i ‘ · Case 3:03-cv—OO991—DJS Document 17 Filed 10/O3/2005 Page 1 of 1
i · ‘ ' ME n. c0mi.°%vIdqe*R>*1“
z » * _ 03-cv-99I
l Squatrito, J .
United States Court of Appeals
Fon ma
SECOND CIRCUIT I
l At a stated Tenn ofthe United States Court of Appeals fgthe Second
i Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Cou1thou$_§%i,’;atF·ce1Jey Sliare,
I in the City of New York, on the iaith day of Jury two§®uszItid HF - )
ig "’ rn
Present: La.; 'U @
CD
Hon. Chester J . Straub, %—€§§rE;?—5.,_
I Hon. Robert D. Sack] eT\· g;t"»_,t~g>;_; @0,0
` · Circuit Judges. . 6%- ·
:;:5] JUL 'l 4 ZUU5 °’° I
4;.
@$60 ‘t·. i‘\<§h
Jeremiah Young Flynn 5* ty?
Plaintiff—Appellant, l _
S v. A 04-1676-cv l
Mastuck Pequot Tribe, et al., ‘ `
` l
Defendants—Appe1lees.
Appellant, iy se, moves for appointment of counsel. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED
that the motion is denied, and the appeal is dismissed, as the appeal lacks an arguable basis in
9 law or fact. g Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).
I It
_ :
FOR THE COURT:
Roseann B MacKechnie, lerk 2
A TRUE COPY I EE}
Roseann B . ME·1CK€Ch!’1Zi.6; CLERK in
. 1 N
DEPU Y CLERK I . . E
t
Jut 14 2005 0 tg I
. ,. . . . . . . . "U ,
The Honorable Mark D. Kravitz, United States Distrnct Judge for the District of $3 1
Connecticut, sitting by designation, has recused himself from this matter. The remaining two ~ l
. judges have decided the matter pursuant to Second Circuit Local Rule 0.l4(b). ·~ i
I I l
- gg _g_g