Free Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

~~ U ·~—+————·——
Casg 3:03-cv-O100©CH Document 13 Filed 11/1 @03 Pé§@1II1>jT)1IIrpI’r1TI·q
. I T
I I
I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FII. E D
‘ I I
` I
IV I DISTRICT OF NN TI · I
II- I CO EC CUT zum mv ·b P I2- 3I I
I I
I PETER II»IIIIZI$T$’ I ug uIsIa‘ T CI"' 3 BIaTu¤;aII¤c.IT my
I I ° KJFWMV I
VS. : 3:03cvI 001 (JCH) T
J. MORA ES, ET AL., :
De endont : NOVEMBER 5, 2003
I I
REPORT OF PARTIES' PLANNING MEETING I
T I
T _ I
PuIsuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. l6(b), 26(f) and Local Civil

I Rule 38I a conference was held on OCTOBER , 2003. The I
I particidants were Norman A. Pattis for the plaintiff and Barbara I
I I T
Brazzel Massaro for the defendants.
I I
I I. CERTIFICATION I
Unjersigned counsel certify that, after consultation with I
I — I
-- t“·ir cqients, they have discussed the nature and basis of the I
` Is I
QI I ;iesI claims and defenses and any possibilities for achieving I
.`-I `I I I
_%! I ·q§p% settlement or other resolution of the case and, in I
—I I . ; A -—-_ I
{3 EI *:3 uikjtign with their clients, have developed the following I
I 5 T ~i I
~ §I I%% oeed age; management plan. Counsel further certify that they I
-I II-QQ "` I I
QE§wI IEE; §§IwI§§%d a copy of this report to their clients.
Q §_I E;@§RIISDICTION I
Q I • T '
U E. I I
gg A. SUBJECT MATTER JURIsDIcTIoN I
ga 2 `ag T I
§I§§_d{\ The basis for the court‘s subject matter jurisdiction 5
T3 ug I I
EEIIEKD 1atIthe suit raises claims arising under this Court’s federal I
§-E II §I.Y\ I
Ii III Q \·
§· O R E I
M A me I
I I I
-T Q; — -- ;; — -;; - ; .. _ .. Y .. i .-
*,? T ·;; · Y ·;; - ;; . ; I __ _ __ _ __ f