Free Jury Verdict - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

.-.-_-2 ... .. ._--w.c-._.i..MM-_”..._—..c._—..——»—t-.—#—..-—h._*._—..——.m--
i ‘ Case 3:03-cv—O1001-JCH Document 49 Filed O4/26/2005 Page USB2/lOD‘§[ll`jlZ\{,'DLS,
i x 1 iii `thwi -M * gw &.:·)y‘.:.';f~_5_{<'i`.4r,,*FL . L
Y A r ··
i . .,a. 1.: *;. ..e< J`
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT y Y · /
{ DISTRICT oi= CONNECTICUT Y » ·
l PETER PAszl . Plaintiff, ; civit AcTlorv No.
: 3:03-cv—100‘l (JCH) _
V. I -
JOSEPH MORALES, Z APRIL 26, 2005 T
Defendant. :
vERoicT i=oRM
l
1. Has Mr. Paszko proven by a preponderance of the evidence that his .
constitutional right to be free from the use of excessive force has been violated
by Officer Morales?
Yes gf i No
If your answer is "no," please proceed to the end of this form. If your i
answer is "yes," proceed to Question 2. i
2. What is the amount of compensatory (or nominal) damages Mr. Paszko has ` i
proven by a preponderance ofthe evidence that he suffered as a proximate .
cause of Officer MoraIes's violation of Mr. Paszko's constitutional right?
l
$`* l
l
3. Has Mr. Paszko proven that Officer Morales acted willfully, maliciously, or with i
reckless disregard in connection with Officer MoraIes’s violation of Mr. Paszko's .
constitutional right?
Yes ( No E I
lf your answer is "no," please proceed to the end of this form. If your
answer is "yes," proceed to Question 4. A i
-r·· rr - wr —_

·=·- -- - __ Di

_ Case 3:03-cv-01001-JCH Document 49 Filed O4/26/2005 Page 2 of 2 I I
4. What, if any, do you determine in your discretion to award to Mr. Paszko as
punitive damages?
s O
Thank you. You have completed your deliberations. Please have your
foreperson sign and date this form. I
Z;G;2]$r _ , .- 2 I
Date Fgtzepegon ? E
I

n
u
I

-2-
I I
I