Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 54.5 kB
Pages: 1
Date: April 12, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 331 Words, 2,103 Characters
Page Size: 598.8 x 810.72 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22933/48.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 54.5 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
J ase 3:03-cv-O1OQ·W7I' Document 48 Filed 04/1·)05 Page 1 of 1 I .
J ifi? 1 “’°'
_ 3 ; . m I
E ‘ ZUUS Will 3 I li? U4 -5 J 1
‘H
X UNITED STATES T ` r` f
::1 I DISTRICT OF C. A , _ (5 T
2 . 1.2/*-*. t x T ,
'•'| . I ` wi
5 VALENTINE BUCKNOR, : ` II I . —
ig _ Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION J
I : NO. 3:03-CV-01003 (AWT)
Fl v. :
E C&S WHOLESALE GROCERS, INC., : ` ` ’
0 , .
Q Defendant. :` MARCH 31, 2005
5
M MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
·¤-I . \
(l'-5 The defendant, C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. ("C&S") moves for an extension of time
·•-I
`
8 of six weeks, u to and including May 10, 2005, for the parties to complete discovery. C&S
g P
ig also requests an extension of time of six weeks, up to and including July 1 1, 2005, in which to
BY · file any dispositive motions, and an extension of time of six weeks, up to and including July
. ‘..•·• l
g 1.1, 2%% to file the joint trial memorandum. This is C&S’s third request for an extension of
"*i :3 c:> L5
si VW . °·’<:¤ . . . ....
>_ ` ”f§“,% Otime discovery deadlines, and its fourth request for an extension of time with respect to
ii ‘ ‘·*‘ »·- L4, I .
B` await # e diil 'ii-sitive motion and joint trial memorandum deadlines. V ”
E »·w·= . mi zlil`3 jgf;1 i
§_ 1‘“1 requires the additional time to conduct discovery related to several discrete
2 issues, including items learned during the continued deposition of Mr. Bucknor on March 28,
r—| .
r·|
jr.: Q I 2005. ,
ag . .
g .6 ’ 6 Kenneth Friedman, counsel for Mr. Bucknor, has no objection to an extension of the
° 0 ci ‘ _ .
E Z ”€ discovery deadline as set forth above. Mr. Friedman also has no objection to a corres onding
S 3 g J extension of the dispositive motion and joint trial memorandum deadlines. ‘ q jj
g °§ gg A I _» Is·1 I
is li A I `
5 S. Ia
ggjvggq O$CUlOO3eN_;,q.7 5 q I