Free Order on Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

i I OJUV/0’//777L/VJ/<
E _ / L.
gx 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
§ DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
NICHOLAS CAGGIANIELLO, NEIL CASE NO. 303CV10l 1(AWT)
=. V . HOWARD and THOMAS FALCO, on j :
· behalf of themselves and all other similarly :
§ situated employees of FSG PrivatAir, Inc. :
E PLAINTIFFS, E
§ vs, ; j A_,_
• (.....-
§ . . · iw % m
. FSG PRIVATAIR, INC. and in their : k j ·_l ;`,:, % _____
individual and official capacities DAVID C. : · `s.jVi_¤_?f> TQ W-·’
HURLEY, HUGH F. REGAN, THOMAS H. : 'j qnum
. MILLER and THOMAS L. CONNELLY : A €i?*·~2?¤
_ cts .»·l `V ©
g DEFENDANTS. : APRIL 26, 2004 L
TP an
V, .»—··§ ‘
DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS
I Defendants FSG PrivatAir, Inc. ("PrivatAir"), David Hurley, Hugh F. Regan, Thomas H.
Miller and Thomas L; Connelly, by theirliattorney, submit their Renewed Motion to Dismiss the
% above-entitled action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (‘i‘F.R.C.P.")vel2 (b)( 1) on the
g ground that thecourt does not have subject matter jurisdiction over the Fair Labor Standards Act
l ig ("FLSA5 asserted by the Plaintiffs. Your Honor denied Defendants’ original Motion to
@ t {Dismisaat oral?~~arig)·u1nent on October 9, 2004, but subsequently ordered the parties to conduct
{ V w idiscover‘y?on snbientmatter jurisdiction in contemplation of the filing of this Renewed Motion to
g E ‘Dismiss.i;I’ursuant io Your Honor’s Order dated December 24, 2003, the Defendants file this
5 § V Motion onJApril 26, 2004., `
Q! . Q RAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
J » I 1 —