Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

{_ U Case 3:03-cv-01014-JBA Document 107 Filed 05/18/2005 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT g

H. JONATHAN FRANK, MORGAN FRANK, *
AND FRANK FAMILY 1996 TRUST 1* DOCKET NO.
Plaintiffs * 3:03 CV 1014 (JBA)
vs. * _
#5 E
ARTHUR LOVETERE, CECIL URSPRUNG, *
LOUIS J. BACCEI, WORTH LOOMIS, * I
THEODORE PATLOVICH, STEPHEN J. RAFFAY, * ¥
WILLIAM P. ROWLAND, PETER EIO (individually "‘
and in their capacity as members of the Board of *
Directors Of Reflexite Corporation) and * Y
REF LEXITE CORPORATION * `
Defendants * May 17, 2005 j
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Pursuant to Rule 6(b) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 7(b) of the
Local Rules of Civil Procedure, defendant Cecil Ursprung ("Mr. Ursprung") hereby ;
moves for an extension of time of thirty (30) days, to and including June 20, 2005, in
which to respond and/or object to the plaintiffs’ discovery requests served on counsel for
Mr. Ursprung on April 20, 2005. Mr. Ursprung’s responses are currently due on or
before May 20, 2005. This is Mr. Ursprung’s first request for an extension of time to ,
respond to these discovery requests. i
Mr. Ursprung requires additional time to respond to these discovery requests
because: (I) on May I0, 2005, a settlement conference was conducted before Magistrate 1
i24is.00i.es7ii2.i 3

Case 3:03-cv-01014-JBA Document 107 Filed 05/18/2005 Page 2 of 3
Judge Margolis in this matter, and, in an effort to minimize costs in advance of what he
hoped would be a productive discussion, l\/lr. Ursprun g did not expend substantial time
and expense in preparing responses to the discovery prior to the conference; and (2) J
counsel requires additional time to adequately respond to the requests, which include
forty-four (44) requests for production, many of which have "sub—parts,” and a number of
interrogatories.
Undersigned counsel has contacted p1aintiffs’ attorney, Jeffrey Simes, who
objects to this request. Mr. Simes has indicated that he would consent, on certain
grounds, to a limited extension to June 10, 2005.
DEFENDANT
CECIL URSPRUNG
By · ·`ii*’ Z/we 1
Edward F. ne11a (
Fed. Ct. No. ct25l63 ‘
J Reid and Riege, P.C. »
One Financial Plaza
Hartford, CT 06103
Tel. 860-278-1150
Fax: 860-240-1002
12418.001/381365.1 J

Case 3:03-cv-01014-JBA Document 107 Filed 05/18/2005 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that on the 17th day of May, 2005 a copy of the foregoing Motion
for Extension of Time was sent by Hrst class mail, postage prepaid, to: i
Jonathan B. T ropp, Esq. Craig A. Raabe, Esq.
Patricia M. Canavan, Esq. Jason J. Kuselias, Esq. ;
Day, Berry & Howard LLP Robinson & Cole LLP g
One Canterbury Green 280 Trumbull Street
Stamford, CT 06901 Hartford, CT 06103-3597
Tel. # (203) 977-7300 Tel. # (860) 275-8200
Attorneys for P/czintlffg Attorneys for Defendant i
RefZexite Corporation A
Richard M. Strassberg, Esq.
Jeffrey Alan Simes, Esq. James T. Cowdery, Esquire
Goodwin Procter LLP Cowdery, Ecker & Murphy, LLC
599 Lexington Avenue 750 Main Street
New York, NY 10022 Hartford, CT 06103-2703
Tel. # (212) 813-8800 Tel. # (860) 278-5555 i
Attorneys for Plain/wwf? Attorneys for Defendants j
Lovetere, Baccei, Loomis,
Pot/ovic/1, Rczjjfczy, and Eio
James T. Shearin, Esq.
Pullman & Comley, LLC
850 Main Street
P. O. Box 7006 .
Bridgeport, CT 06601
Tel. # (203) 330-2240
Attorneys for Defendant 5
VWllicun P. Rowland
Edwar . Spinella
/ é
2 2
12418.001/381365.1