Free Order on Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

-_-___ _--·` mh Wm I . · 0 6 " v ¤ ·
- Case :03-cv-01 01 -J BA I:'•cument 48 Filed 12/05/20 3 age ..1 of 1 i

`*··. :7 C-
Q, l UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Ia I i 21
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT L. ii ..j, .. .. , _ __ _ _ T
H it VI lift`. fr °,, ;
`§ Q H. JO ATHAN FRANK, MORGAN FRANK, * L ,
l AND RANK FAMILY 1996 TRUST * DO KET NO. / ` I
3 Plaintiffs * 3:0 `CV 1014 (IBA)
Q:} \ *
vs. * T
as *
ART IUR LOVETERE, CECIL URSPRUNG, * ’
6% LOU S J. BACCEI, WORTH LOOMIS, *
THE DORE PATLOVICH, STEPHEN J. RAFFAY, *
WIL IAM P. ROWLAND, PETER EIO (individually *
{_ A I \ and i their capacity as members of the Board of * ,
ig; * Direc ors Of Reflexite Corporation) and * l
gg; i _ EXITE CORPORATION *
__i Defendants * De mber l, 2003
*f= li ... ..1+ *
is I .;.
TS :5 Qi r, -? .
_` ‘_ DEFENDANT CECIL URSPRUNG'S MOTION F 1 R I I
gg {Z'. _ 33* an PERMISSION TO FILE TARDY MOTION TO DIS I ISS
·z."Q
13 ai;} ae
I Defendant Cecil Ursprung ("Ursprung") moves for permission t tile his Motion
as ii is .
gg to Dr miss late.
.¢:4 .--1 •'(¥·• " L
The deadline for tiling Defendant Ursprung's Motion to Dismis was November
26, 2 l03. The undersigned was on vacation November 25 and 26, 200 - and his firm was
close 1 on November 27 and 28, 2003. The undersigned inadvertently llowed the
deadline to pass. Also, Defendant Ursprung did not receive Defendant I' etlexite's
Moti n to Dismiss and accompanying Memorandum of Law until Dec mber 1, 2003.
Defe iidant Ursprung intended to join Defendant Reflexite's Motion to ismiss, assuming i
l
the Yotion appropriately addressed his concerns about the Plaintiffs' A ended K
izm.ioui466ov.i
Q . l