Free Order on Motion to Amend/Correct - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

F ° K I I ?°“{
’ \ $/28/2005 Page 1 of 1
P I V 1111 I
q e/ \ J V: P It I 1 11 I 11 t:;%; . es1 t1 T C P e
»V»1V; C A \\ l I 1/ 1 1 *1 ll1*1***31?LllKI?,'1ll ’ , , F 0 L & D
VQ :.: I ·;:111 It .~11 111 1 1 ;: ·1t,,1 L ` I ._,..1.1.;`, 11\ “ 1 1 *
` ** ‘¥J1`iv'i' ` ,_`1 ·` 1 i v` i \ V ii;€?l;·11».1 . 1 i
I * L 1 I “ / \ 1 1’‘1 ,, C 3 ·
JULIE D·ILLQNi· ’V1 ~ e i lt dll l ll i l i i v lt ftitf? *»t1¥w:_,», , IL ACTION NO. O D lZ· 3*] 3
1‘1` `v‘ . 1 1 :03-CV-IIQQ6 QQ} t yy I
1 Plaintiffamtzi tonnmtmelaim pm {EQU F1 li A
Defendant, " ·
- agaiiistii`1111 »V1,_ i , — I
MERRILL LYNCH CREDIT CORPORATION,
, _ _ g 1 IICV _ December 30, 2004
Defendant and Counterclaimantf ·;._ *
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR .
TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER TO SECONDX *
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIMSW I
Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Lynch
Credit Corp. ("MLCC") hereby seeks leave of the Court to file an Amended Answer to Second I
Amended Complaint and Counterclaims in the above-captioned action. In support of this
motion, MLCC states: _ U
I 1 1. By virtue of the proposed A1nended Answer to Second Amended Complaint and I
Counterclaims, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1, MLCC seeks only to add an equitable \
subrogation counterclaim as its Third Claim for Relief against Plaintiff Julie Dillon Ripley Miller
("Miller"). The doctrine of equitable subrogation was first recognized in Cormecticut in Home
" `°"’11‘"‘”*·*·e P~=*·~·¤JL2L£¤—l23Conn. 2321(I ,has sgbgp g
February 25, 2005 ' *— ~
1 A ‘ 3:O3»CVO1016 (RNC) i
Re: Motion for leave to Ifile e(D¤¢,Qi# 112), . 1 I (___
Grant d 1;1q · I , [4. `W ""
e Ofdexgd . on e unde1·stend1ng that fu1:t1}e1:· discovery gjéiqui ed _ SO
tie as E'.!
{ 1 { L I 4 C C _ _, ,_ ,,,__, W gg g·—
1 .,.,_,,,, e tg- 2;* ]> ‘
eeeyl e I U. Si.-D I-e=a,:._.¤ .,,4 G
. *··* rw