Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I*—%—_—;—__m—*_m_—”“_—"_———*“—%"__`__"_`—_`——""L—
I s I; Case 3303-ov-01016(\%WE Document 49 Filed 12/2€€OO3 VILTJIQ, MWF
.. ___ `—’
I l W `
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Ij I _ ’;‘
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT " ‘” I " ‘‘’‘‘‘` I ` "
h---”_------—--__------“——-_—-----inH--'"-_----—--—__----——-—------—-_X ·` r- if IM, F _)
I Ig E JULIE DILLON RIPLEY MILLER, ; tan. lz =w- Z5
is is . . * Ca °-‘l?,i‘?YiIRQIWNQDIIQFMI
E sr El Plamufi = If IM ·I;-L .I.I*II·
Fi N , 1 ’· »§?iE,,2 =__Z
Uma . " ,
I § I; `Q — against- : December I 1, 2003
r·| .0 >‘1 2
I gl E S MERRILL LYNCH CREDIT CORPORATION, : I
I CD
O U} [
B E Defendant. : I
it it ···································································· X I
g TI CD l
_ ,,2 Q JOINT MOTION REGARDING PRE-TRIAL ISSUES I
U] ¤·l
G} Ul ¤-I
5 fj I; Q In furtherance of the efficient administration of this proceeding, the parties to this action I
CI GJ DG
4-J "U 01* E1]
E E U gtogether bring this Joint Motion Regarding Pre-Trial Issues the "Joint Motion" . The arties
case P I
EVE} 2* grespectfully request that the Court grant the following relief: (i) that the schedule for expert
N AJ
CU I>—• I-I ·
jj § ggdisclosure be revised; and (ii) that the discovery cut—off date be extended. I
O G) N
GI U n-I r
E Q E Fi This is the third motion to amend the dates in the pre-trial schedule, but the first motion I
FU JJ Z>1
C5 Q
E EE EE hg to extend the discovery cut-off. The first and second motions sought only to extend the
.‘>—. ><: is Q
gg g @ Ines for expert discovery. As ofthe date of this motion, the parties have diligently pursued and
U LI-I <|' O
g jg S it Inged discovery, including the following: (i) both parties have propounded, and responded to,
5 r-I ..Q
o· ts F
§ %) EI Qui intent requests and interrogatories; (ii) depositions ofthe parties and various non—party witnesses
¤ cn M
TE }{Jb'W:l been commenced and/or completed; (iii) both parties have produced "non-1·ebuttal" expert
··-I Er B14 5 _ D I
~. E -·-I, f -.
IE L,
,’> \ CU O ··-I R,. _
§ 3 fl QL §he pagies that, for the following reasons, there is good cause to grant this motion.
·.a I ,j:ja1.,>
U mi sl I I} ro D- Im,. R`?
Q .-Q U) Q-. _ *` O <_\J
E gg N 2 N
,, ~§ 3 E, 3 5 %;»;L<
ua ct -·—1 Li ` L"-} a.i».` I-:
E—< O U') ·I-I 'fi _. [I I
Z D4 O D gg E;_I_·.‘· —
§ 2 gif? N :1ir§ I
ED DUO ke
__ L_ L_ -- __ v_ __ _ . 7