Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

A , Case 3:03-cv-01027-JBA Document 17 Filed O2/24/200403(E&1£y3%l;1)¤ldy.+m-6
I \Q\ UNITED STATES DISTIIICT COIIKIII I""-;
I I Ig!} __e(_ _ I, QW.
I DISTRICT OF CONNIECTICUT
. ., - . I
I ZIIIIII III;I3 I `I ID 2- IIIJ I
I AGNES KOLE, : LI rl { E I Q . I . . .
I Plaintiff, : CIVIL IIO. 3:03ICI/1027(WWE)(HB`FJ§Y\CJ
v. : I
I
WARDEN KUMA DEBOO, :
`
KI ‘ Defendant. : FebruaI·y 17, 2004 I
I, 5.;, . I
It I
, 3 GOVERNMENT’S THIRD OTION FOR
ZL `tft ff II? ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RES OND TO COMPLAINT
This Court has issued two previous extensions Iuf time, up to February 17, 2004, to I
permit theIICIovernment to respond to the plaintiff’s co1I1plaint. The Government’s has
· I
df completed its Notice of Substitution, Motion to DismisI and 33 page supporting memorandum, I
`é with exhibits. The Government’s memorandum includI=:s a lack of subject matter jurisdiction
O
s) . I
Q.- argument based on 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a), discretionary Ifunction exception ("DFE"). This I
I
g I I portion of the Govermnent’s memorandum is currently under review by the Department of I
S
Justice, awaiting its approval. The Department’s appr val for raising a DFE argument is I
`¤` I
{ `gwequired before undersigned counsel may file the Gove nment’s motion and supporting
g \~
E Iidocuments. Undersigned counsel anticipates that the epartment’s approval will be
·=°\
_; _- gforthcoming over the next few days, and accordingly r quests a four (4) day extension, up to
ri , I
E . § and including February 20, 2004. I
E gg Government counsel is unable to ascertain plainIiff’s position with respect to this I
¢= -0 l· .
% _ II Ig request due to her incarceration. I
; Irs I I I
tI .
I
I i I
i Is I I
V.-I-,7.Â¥,,,_l___ I I I I I I I I I I -I _ Ii- Iv II- In
- i - - f - . V _ ___------------
J ‘_· ·_-_-_-_. ..
IIIIIII`` I I
é- 7 -- . _ __----------